| 查看: 3350 | 回复: 9 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者风过无影2012将赠送您 15 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
Macromolecules被拒，申诉有意义吗？ 已有1人参与
|
||
|
如题，6.11投稿，7.19被拒，两个审稿人，一个小修，一个拒稿（没有明确理由），具体如下： Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Reconsider after major revisions. Comments: This manuscript reports new epoxy (EP)-based molecular composites with sulfonated aromatic polyamides,poly(p-sulfophenylene terephthalamide) (sPPTA) and poly(benzidine-2,2'-disulfonic acid terephthamide) (PBDT), as the reinforcement, which disperse uniformly in epoxy, but do not show liquid crystalline structure. It is very interesting and the paper is well designed. The mechanical properties is significantly enhanced. However, before acceptance, minor revisions are needed. 1. Fig. 1. the legend is lost. 2. NMR is suggested to prove the reaction in the scheme 1, 3. The mechanical performances decreased when the sPPTA and the PBDT were more than 6%. Please explain the reason. 4. As the properties were decreasd when the the sPPTA and the PBDT were more than 6%, please give the SEM figure to explain this phenomenon. 5. The following paper can be referred to support your study;1) Composites Part B: Engineering, 2017, 114: 111-120. Additional Questions: Do these findings represent a significant advance in the polymer field?: Yes Please rate the overall quality and clarity of the manuscript: Good Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes Is the Supporting Information, if included, technically sound and sufficient to support the findings of the manuscript?: Yes Would you like to bring this manuscript to the attention of the Editor as a particularly newsworthy or noteworthy manuscript?: Yes Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Do not publish. This manuscript is incremental in the field, and offers little if any value to the Macromolecules community Comments: Please consider another journal for your manuscript Additional Questions: Do these findings represent a significant advance in the polymer field?: No Please rate the overall quality and clarity of the manuscript: Fair Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: In part Is the Supporting Information, if included, technically sound and sufficient to support the findings of the manuscript?: No Would you like to bring this manuscript to the attention of the Editor as a particularly newsworthy or noteworthy manuscript?: No 考虑是申诉还是转投，希望有经验的朋友能给予一些意见，谢谢啦，临近申请季时间也比较紧，挺焦虑的。 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有11人回复
-
为什么中国大学工科教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊，但还是做不出宇树机器人？
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有6人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8 O5 51O 54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
 本帖仅楼主可见 |
5楼2018-07-22 21:08:20
yifeng11
至尊木虫 (知名作家)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 11843.6
- 散金: 1052
- 红花: 19
- 帖子: 5424
- 在线: 724.8小时
- 虫号: 2988303
- 注册: 2014-02-23
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 理论和计算化学
2楼2018-07-22 20:54:30
|
本帖仅楼主可见 |
3楼2018-07-22 21:03:03
4楼2018-07-22 21:08:03
