| ²é¿´: 3380 | »Ø¸´: 9 | |||
| ¡¾ÐüÉͽð±Ò¡¿»Ø´ð±¾ÌûÎÊÌ⣬×÷Õß·ç¹ýÎÞÓ°2012½«ÔùËÍÄú 15 ¸ö½ð±Ò | |||
·ç¹ýÎÞÓ°2012½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[ÇóÖú]
Macromolecules±»¾Ü£¬ÉêËßÓÐÒâÒåÂ𣿠ÒÑÓÐ1È˲ÎÓë
|
||
|
ÈçÌ⣬6.11Ͷ¸å£¬7.19±»¾Ü£¬Á½¸öÉó¸åÈË£¬Ò»¸öСÐÞ£¬Ò»¸ö¾Ü¸å£¨Ã»ÓÐÃ÷È·ÀíÓÉ£©£¬¾ßÌåÈçÏ£º Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Reconsider after major revisions. Comments: This manuscript reports new epoxy (EP)-based molecular composites with sulfonated aromatic polyamides,poly(p-sulfophenylene terephthalamide) (sPPTA) and poly(benzidine-2,2'-disulfonic acid terephthamide) (PBDT), as the reinforcement, which disperse uniformly in epoxy, but do not show liquid crystalline structure. It is very interesting and the paper is well designed. The mechanical properties is significantly enhanced. However, before acceptance, minor revisions are needed. 1. Fig. 1. the legend is lost. 2. NMR is suggested to prove the reaction in the scheme 1, 3. The mechanical performances decreased when the sPPTA and the PBDT were more than 6%. Please explain the reason. 4. As the properties were decreasd when the the sPPTA and the PBDT were more than 6%, please give the SEM figure to explain this phenomenon. 5. The following paper can be referred to support your study;1) Composites Part B: Engineering, 2017, 114: 111-120. Additional Questions: Do these findings represent a significant advance in the polymer field?: Yes Please rate the overall quality and clarity of the manuscript: Good Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes Is the Supporting Information, if included, technically sound and sufficient to support the findings of the manuscript?: Yes Would you like to bring this manuscript to the attention of the Editor as a particularly newsworthy or noteworthy manuscript?: Yes Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: Do not publish. This manuscript is incremental in the field, and offers little if any value to the Macromolecules community Comments: Please consider another journal for your manuscript Additional Questions: Do these findings represent a significant advance in the polymer field?: No Please rate the overall quality and clarity of the manuscript: Fair Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: In part Is the Supporting Information, if included, technically sound and sufficient to support the findings of the manuscript?: No Would you like to bring this manuscript to the attention of the Editor as a particularly newsworthy or noteworthy manuscript?: No ¿¼ÂÇÊÇÉêËß»¹ÊÇתͶ£¬Ï£ÍûÓоÑéµÄÅóÓÑÄܸøÓèһЩÒâ¼û£¬Ð»Ð»À²£¬ÁÙ½üÉêÇ뼾ʱ¼äÒ²±È½Ï½ô£¬Í¦½¹Âǵġ£ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©2£¬²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤308Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
²ÄÁϵ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Ö£ÖÝ´óѧ²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤085600£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ24È˻ظ´
283Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
290Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
266·Ö£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸µçÆø¹¤³Ì£¬±¾¿Æ²ÄÁÏ£¬Çó²ÄÁÏרҵµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ8È˻ظ´
288»·¾³×¨Ë¶,Çóµ÷²ÄÁÏ·½Ïò
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
¿¼Ñе÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
298·Ö 070300Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
yifeng11
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖªÃû×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 11843.6
- É¢½ð: 1052
- ºì»¨: 19
- Ìû×Ó: 5424
- ÔÚÏß: 724.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2988303
- ×¢²á: 2014-02-23
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÀíÂۺͼÆË㻯ѧ
2Â¥2018-07-22 20:54:30
3Â¥2018-07-22 21:03:03
4Â¥2018-07-22 21:08:03
5Â¥2018-07-22 21:08:20
nono2009
³¬¼¶°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
No gains, no pains.
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- Ó¦Öú: 28684 (Ժʿ)
- ¹ó±ö: 513.911
- ½ð±Ò: 2555230
- É¢½ð: 27828
- ºì»¨: 2148
- ɳ·¢: 66666
- Ìû×Ó: 1602255
- ÔÚÏß: 65200.9Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 827383
- ×¢²á: 2009-08-13
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ¹¤³ÌÈÈÎïÀíÓëÄÜÔ´ÀûÓÃ
- ¹ÜϽ: ¿ÆÑмҳﱸίԱ»á
6Â¥2018-07-22 21:25:46
Ì«ÐÐËÉÁÖ
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- Ó¦Öú: 3 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 7121.4
- É¢½ð: 1392
- ºì»¨: 5
- Ìû×Ó: 3239
- ÔÚÏß: 1354.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 663985
- ×¢²á: 2008-11-28
- רҵ: ½ðÊô½á¹¹²ÄÁÏ
7Â¥2018-07-22 22:09:21
|
×£¸£ ·¢×ÔСľ³æIOS¿Í»§¶Ë |
8Â¥2018-07-22 22:52:21
dog432
Òø³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 38 (СѧÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 12411.2
- É¢½ð: 670
- ºì»¨: 13
- Ìû×Ó: 1865
- ÔÚÏß: 304.5Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2227447
- ×¢²á: 2013-01-07
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Åäλ»¯Ñ§

9Â¥2018-07-22 23:35:59
mi_dilee
ÖÁ×ðľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 13903.2
- É¢½ð: 185
- ºì»¨: 6
- Ìû×Ó: 2575
- ÔÚÏß: 275Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 902050
- ×¢²á: 2009-11-13
- רҵ: ¸ß·Ö×Ó¿ÆÑ§
10Â¥2018-08-17 13:43:37














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥
