| 查看: 650 | 回复: 1 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者gjzhcc将赠送您 2 个金币 | |||
[求助]
一篇中药治疗方面的meta分析，审稿人的意见都是关于格式的，看不懂 已有1人参与
|
|||
|
Questions: 5. Titles of tables and figures should stay together or at least re-named in its own table and figures. Questions: 6. Some sentences are problematic. For example, "a methodological quality evaluation from was prepared to perform blind scoring for all the documents included." Under the subsection of "Summarization of quality and risk of bias of the included tirals". Is it "a methodological quality evaluation" or "a methodological quality evaluation form"? Questions: 7. The authors need to reorganize some sentences as well. For example, "2 studies reported the result of occurrence rate of MODS. These two studies included 136 patients, including 70 in the experimental group and 66 in the control group". In addition, " the treatment method is suitable for other people do not know at present" in the last paragraph of Results section. 大家谁能给翻译说明一下，审稿人具体是啥意思，我应该怎么做呢，谢谢大家了。 [ Last edited by gjzhcc on 2017-12-16 at 21:04 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
面上没中，邀请各位路过的虫友分析一下分数
已经有9人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8O.55.1.O.54,科目全,可伽急
已经有9人回复
-
广西大学-广州大学招聘博士后 欢迎广大优秀人才！！！
已经有6人回复
-
两块石头
已经有5人回复
-
哈尔滨工业大学韩晓军教授课题组招收2027年硕士推免生及博士研究生
已经有3人回复
-
找导师
已经有8人回复
-
国社科又开始会评了，不知道这次命运如何
已经有14人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
peterflyer 
木虫之王 (文学泰斗)
peterflyer
- 应助: 20282 (院士)
- 金币: 146728
- 红花: 1374
- 帖子: 93091
- 在线: 7695小时
- 虫号: 1482829
- 注册: 2011-11-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 功能陶瓷
2楼2017-12-17 11:19:20