| 查看: 603 | 回复: 1 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者gjzhcc将赠送您 2 个金币 | |||
[求助]
一篇中药治疗方面的meta分析，审稿人的意见都是关于格式的，看不懂 已有1人参与
|
|||
|
Questions: 5. Titles of tables and figures should stay together or at least re-named in its own table and figures. Questions: 6. Some sentences are problematic. For example, "a methodological quality evaluation from was prepared to perform blind scoring for all the documents included." Under the subsection of "Summarization of quality and risk of bias of the included tirals". Is it "a methodological quality evaluation" or "a methodological quality evaluation form"? Questions: 7. The authors need to reorganize some sentences as well. For example, "2 studies reported the result of occurrence rate of MODS. These two studies included 136 patients, including 70 in the experimental group and 66 in the control group". In addition, " the treatment method is suitable for other people do not know at present" in the last paragraph of Results section. 大家谁能给翻译说明一下，审稿人具体是啥意思，我应该怎么做呢，谢谢大家了。 [ Last edited by gjzhcc on 2017-12-16 at 21:04 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
0854求调剂
已经有27人回复
-
材料相关专业344求调剂双非工科学校或课题组
已经有27人回复
-
300求调剂
已经有12人回复
-
291求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
一志愿沪9，326求生物学调剂
已经有12人回复
-
生物学调剂
已经有10人回复
-
320求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
接受任何调剂
已经有7人回复
-
化学070300 求调剂
已经有29人回复
peterflyer 
木虫之王 (文学泰斗)
peterflyer
- 应助: 20282 (院士)
- 金币: 146269
- 红花: 1374
- 帖子: 93091
- 在线: 7694.3小时
- 虫号: 1482829
- 注册: 2011-11-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 功能陶瓷
2楼2017-12-17 11:19:20
