| 查看: 599 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者gjzhcc将赠送您 2 个金币 | ||
[求助]
一篇中药治疗方面的meta分析，审稿人的意见都是关于格式的，看不懂 已有1人参与
|
||
|
Questions: 5. Titles of tables and figures should stay together or at least re-named in its own table and figures. Questions: 6. Some sentences are problematic. For example, "a methodological quality evaluation from was prepared to perform blind scoring for all the documents included." Under the subsection of "Summarization of quality and risk of bias of the included tirals". Is it "a methodological quality evaluation" or "a methodological quality evaluation form"? Questions: 7. The authors need to reorganize some sentences as well. For example, "2 studies reported the result of occurrence rate of MODS. These two studies included 136 patients, including 70 in the experimental group and 66 in the control group". In addition, " the treatment method is suitable for other people do not know at present" in the last paragraph of Results section. 大家谁能给翻译说明一下，审稿人具体是啥意思，我应该怎么做呢，谢谢大家了。 [ Last edited by gjzhcc on 2017-12-16 at 21:04 ] |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
270求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
347求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
280求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
药学305求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
材料考研调剂
已经有18人回复
-
085501机械专硕 302分 不挑专业求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
085404 293求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
327求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
312求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
262求调剂
已经有14人回复
peterflyer 
木虫之王 (文学泰斗)
peterflyer
- 应助: 20282 (院士)
- 金币: 146244
- 红花: 1374
- 帖子: 93091
- 在线: 7694.3小时
- 虫号: 1482829
- 注册: 2011-11-08
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 功能陶瓷
2楼2017-12-17 11:19:20
