| ²é¿´: 802 | »Ø¸´: 3 | ||||
ºé_Ñ×îñгæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
Çë½ÌһϸÅÂÊÂÛËÆÈ»º¯ÊýµÄÎÊÌâ
|
|
Õâ¸öÌâËÆÈ»º¯Êý¸ø³ö£¬ÎªÉ¶²»ÄÜÇ󵼵óöËÆÈ»º¯ÊýÔÚsei taÔÚ£¨-¡Þ£¬1£©µ¥µ÷µÝÔö£¬Ôٵóö´ð°¸£¬Õâ¸ö´ð°¸ËµÕâÊǵäÐÍ´íÎ󣬵«ÔÒòû¿´¶®£¬15ÄêÕæÌâ ·¢×ÔСľ³æIOS¿Í»§¶Ë |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
²ÄÁÏ¿¼Ñе÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
346Çóµ÷¼Á[0856]
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
281Çóµ÷¼Á£¨0805£©
ÒѾÓÐ18È˻ظ´
294Çóµ÷¼Á²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤×¨Ë¶
ÒѾÓÐ9È˻ظ´
288Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
328Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ó¢ÓïÁù¼¶551£¬ÓпÆÑоÀú
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Î÷°²½»Í¨´óѧ²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìרҵ 282·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
085601²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìר˶Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
321Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öк£Ñó²ÄÁϹ¤³Ìר˶330·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ7È˻ظ´
zaq123321
ר¼Ò¹ËÎÊ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +342 - ÊýѧEPI: 6
- Ó¦Öú: 298 (´óѧÉú)
- ¹ó±ö: 0.247
- ½ð±Ò: 11336.3
- ºì»¨: 29
- Ìû×Ó: 1221
- ÔÚÏß: 538.8Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 405284
- ×¢²á: 2007-06-17
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
- רҵ: ÉúÎï´ó·Ö×ӽṹÓ빦ÄÜ
- ¹ÜϽ: Êýѧ
¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
|
This question seems very interesting. If we do like the normal way and take derivative with respect to theta, the derivative will not depend on X1,...,xn explicitly. But when you notice the condition between theta and x, you will see there's a constraint of theta, this you have to find the best theta under the condition that maximizes the likelihood function. This question is of course challenging for most testees. Just remember this case. [ ·¢×ÔÊÖ»ú°æ http://muchong.com/3g ] |

2Â¥2017-12-11 20:33:10
ÑÅÓÎ2014
гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 37.5
- Ìû×Ó: 7
- ÔÚÏß: 9.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3559666
- ×¢²á: 2014-11-25
- רҵ: ÊýÀíͳ¼Æ
3Â¥2017-12-13 13:31:02
ºé_Ñ×îñ
гæ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 154.2
- Ìû×Ó: 53
- ÔÚÏß: 11.3Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 7162117
- ×¢²á: 2017-09-09
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: ÀíÂۺͼÆË㻯ѧ
|
µ«ÊÇÎÊÌâµÄ¹Ø¼üÊÇseitaȡֵ-¡Þµ½min{x1,x2...}£¬ÔÚÕâÖ®¼äseitaÊÇÁ¬ÐøµÄ£¬È¡ÈÎÒâÖµ¾ù¿É£¬£¨±ÈÈçmin{x1,x2...}=1£¬seita¿ÉÒÔÈ¡0.1¡¢0.2µÈµÈµÄÁ¬ÐøÖµ£¬Ã¿Ò»¸öȡֵ¶¼¶ÔÓ¦Ò»¸öËÆÈ»º¯ÊýÖµ£¬ÒªÏëËÆÈ»º¯Êý×î´ó£¬seitaÈ¡min{x1,x2...}£¬¼´seita=1¡££©¡£ ¶ømin{x1,x2...}Ö»ÊÇÌṩÁËÒ»¸öseitaÉÏÏÞ¡£²»ÖªÎÒÀí½âÊÇ·ñÓÐÎÊÌâ ·¢×ÔСľ³æIOS¿Í»§¶Ë |
4Â¥2017-12-15 09:28:19













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥