应《网络安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未进行实名认证将不得使用互联网跟帖服务。为保障您的帐号能够正常使用，请尽快对帐号进行手机号验证，感谢您的理解与支持！

24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
小木虫论坛-学术科研互动平台 » 学术交流区 » 论文投稿 » 投稿求助 » carbohydrate polymer投稿后未外审但意见是大修，请问各位有没有遇到这种情况
51/1返回列表
查看: 3336  |  回复: 19
只看楼主@他人 存档 新回复提醒 (忽略) 收藏    在APP中查看
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

hgnsky

新虫 (小有名气)

[交流] carbohydrate polymer投稿后未外审但意见是大修，请问各位有没有遇到这种情况

请教各位，最近在carbohydrate polymer上投稿，编辑给出意见有点没看明白，应该没外审但是大修，这种情况下被拒的几率大么，意见如下，也想请问下各位有没有遇到过这种情况，谢谢！！！
Dear Professor Hu,

Thank you for submitting the above manuscript to Carbohydrate Polymers.  We have now received the reviewers' reports, and regrettably I must inform you that the manuscript is not acceptable for publication in its present form, and requires major revision before it can be reconsidered for publication.
For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below.  I believe that the comments/suggestions made by the reviewers are self-explanatory.
If you decide to revise the work, please submit an itemized list of changes which have been made in response to the reviewer's comments/suggestions or a rebuttal of why a particular comment/suggestion was not acted upon. Changes to the manuscript should be made in RED so they are distinct from the original text.In order to expedite publication of the manuscript, I would appreciate receiving the revised manuscript by Dec 15 2017 12:00AM. If the revised manuscript is not received by Dec 15 2017 12:00AM, it will be considered withdrawn.

Reviewers' comments:
Dear Dr. Hu: thank you for submitting your manuscript to Carbohydrate Polymers. I find that it could possibly be of interest to our readers, but that ther are aspects in need of improvement before I would consider sending it to reviewers. I find no statement of hypothesis as required by the journal (see guide for authors for guidance). Characterization of your natural polysaccharide does not fully meet journal standards (see guide for authors, in which alginate in fact is used as an example). Significance and novelty of your work are unclear as written. I look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:

查看全部散金贴
1楼2017-11-16 22:42:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

elsa2005

木虫 (著名写手)
有一点值得肯定的是，编辑觉得你的文章是能够引起读者兴趣的，应该是文章的某方面很吸引人。

发自小木虫Android客户端
赞一下 回复此楼
6楼2017-11-16 23:02:15
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 20 个回答

elsa2005

木虫 (著名写手)
★
hgnsky(金币+1): 谢谢参与
这个是编辑的意见，你稿件的状态是大修吗？

发自小木虫Android客户端
赞一下(1人) 回复此楼
2楼2017-11-16 22:56:50
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hgnsky

新虫 (小有名气)
状态是修改，编辑给的信里是大修

发自小木虫Android客户端
赞一下 回复此楼
3楼2017-11-16 22:58:53
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

elsa2005

木虫 (著名写手)
但没有直接拒掉还是有希望的，意思是你的结构解析不全面，重点和新颖性不突出。你需要挖掘一下，你的结构解析做了哪些？做甲基化了吗？

发自小木虫Android客户端
赞一下 回复此楼
4楼2017-11-16 22:58:59
 已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
简单回复
逝水无痕19908楼
2017-11-16 23:04   回复  
hgnsky(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
翻译与润色13楼
2017-11-16 23:10   回复  
hgnsky(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
查看全部 20 个回答
普通表情 龙 兔 虎 猫 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
关闭
请填处理意见
关闭