24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 10481  |  回复: 14
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者wangbing108222将赠送您 40 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

wangbing108222

至尊木虫 (正式写手)

[求助] APL找不到审稿人,被拒稿,能不能申诉? 已有4人参与

编辑找了五个审稿人,都拒绝审稿,最后编辑将文章拒了,还能不能申诉?
投稿状态如下:
Stage        Start Date
Decision Sent to Author        02-Nov-2017 10:59:46
Decision Letter Being Prepared        02-Nov-2017 08:36:00
Associate Editor Decision Completed        02-Nov-2017 08:36:00
Reviewer Assignment Started        01-Nov-2017 18:37:22
Potential Reviewer Declined to Review        01-Nov-2017 18:37:22
Potential Reviewer Invitation(s) Sent        01-Nov-2017 15:27:41
Potential Reviewer Declined to Review        31-Oct-2017 18:00:32
Potential Reviewer Invitation(s) Sent        31-Oct-2017 14:18:35
Potential Reviewer Declined to Review        30-Oct-2017 20:32:57
Potential Reviewer Invitation(s) Sent        30-Oct-2017 16:17:52
Potential Reviewer No Response to Invitation        30-Oct-2017 16:17:41
Potential Reviewer Invitation(s) Sent        23-Oct-2017 12:21:39
Potential Reviewer Declined to Review        23-Oct-2017 12:15:09
Potential Reviewer Invitation(s) Sent        23-Oct-2017 11:59:34
Potential Reviewers Selected        23-Oct-2017 11:59:28
Reviewer Assignment Started        21-Oct-2017 19:53:19
Securing Associate Editor        20-Oct-2017 13:46:03
Securing Editor        20-Oct-2017 13:46:02
Submission Check by Editorial Office Completed        20-Oct-2017 13:46:02
Submission Check by Editorial Office Started        20-Oct-2017 04:19:04
Securing Editor        20-Oct-2017 04:19:04
Manuscript Submitted to Editorial Office        20-Oct-2017 04:19:03
Preliminary Manuscript Data Submitted        19-Oct-2017 22:29:42

副主编的拒稿信:
Despite this number of reviewers, we have been unable to secure sufficient, substantive reviews to make an informed editorial decision. We typically require two reviews to make a decision but can make a decision with a single, comprehensive review. Neither of these requirements was met in this case.

When an exceptionally large number of qualified reviewers within the field of a paper decline the review assignment, this is generally seen as an indication of a lack of interest in the topic of the paper for the readers of our Journal. In such cases, we find that continuing to look for qualified reviewers who will accept the assignment leads to further delay. I am, therefore, returning the paper to you, so you can seek publication elsewhere where other qualified reviewers may be found. If one review was obtained, the reviewer's comments are given below for reference.

Please accept my apologies for the delay this has caused in the publication of your manuscript.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
wangbing108222: 金币+5, 有帮助, 多谢 2017-11-03 09:34:25
找不到审稿人说明你的研究比较冷门,还是投到比较对口的期刊为好。
6楼2017-11-03 09:30:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 15 个回答
2楼2017-11-03 09:12:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

xiaogao0859

新虫 (正式写手)

五个都拒,基本没戏,改投别刊省时省事

发自小木虫IOS客户端
3楼2017-11-03 09:13:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

peterflyer

木虫之王 (文学泰斗)

peterflyer


【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
wangbing108222: 金币+5, 有帮助, 多谢,APL效率挺高的,13天找了5个审稿人。对我来说倒是不着急。 2017-11-03 09:18:18
感觉申诉的意义不大,还是赶快找其他合适的期刊改投吧,时间不等人。
4楼2017-11-03 09:15:45
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见