| 查看: 13606 | 回复: 35 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
大家交流Journal of Cleaner Production编辑意见
|
|||
|
前天submitted，昨天rejected 主编希望修改后重投，可是责任编辑的一些问题有点难以捉摸，提供原件与大家交流下 Ms. Ref. No.: JCLEPRO-D-17-06182 Title: XXX Journal of Cleaner Production Dear Professor XXX, Thank you for considering Journal of Cleaner Production. Although you have an interesting and valuable paper, the paper needs to be substantial improved before it can be considered for Journal of Cleaner Production. Below please find editor's comments for your guidance. We hope you can consider improving the manuscript accordingly and resubmitting it as a new article. Meanwhile, we hope that the articles we have published in the Journal of Cleaner Production will continue to be useful for you and your colleagues in research and teaching. Yours sincerely, XXX Co-Editor-in-Chief Journal of Cleaner Production Reviewers' comments: Thank you for your interest in JCLP as a target outlet to submit a result of your fine research work. However, this manuscript failed to clearly show contribution to the body of knowledge JCLP has been developing. I also suggest you to re-read the instruction for authors and the journal's scope.（是说稿件与期刊主旨不符吗？） As it is, the paper seems more a technical report, please use the literature background to broaden the manuscript foundation.（所谓的use the literature background to broaden the manuscript foundation是指在introduction充分利用相关文献部分拓展、提升论文基调吗？） Please develop a much better title. This one does not state what is important to catch the prospective reader's attention. Underscore the scientific value added of your paper in your abstract. Please look at articles we have published for models. Your abstract should clearly state the essence of the problem you are addressing, what you did and what you found and recommend. That will help a prospective reader of the abstract to decide if they wish to read the entire article. Please make sure your conclusions' section underscore the scientific value added of your paper, and/or the applicability of your findings/results. Highlight the novelty of your study. Clearly discuss what the previous studies that you are referring to are. （这句话表达的意思是什么？）What are the Research Gaps/Contributions. The paper is very experimental, and discussion and conclusions clearly do not establish a strong correlation with cleaner production/sustainability/environmental concerns （结果与讨论需要往这三个方面靠拢吗？）. In your discussion section please link your empirical results with a broader and deeper literature review（文献支撑自己的主要结论？）. In your conclusions, please discuss the implications of your research. Grammar and syntax must be improved. Revision with the help of a native English speaker is highly recommended. I hope that the feedback I provided should be useful for authors and I recommend to take more time and care if submitting a revised version of the manuscript. |
回复此楼» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）
sangzhi32» 猜你喜欢
不自信的我
已经有5人回复
-
磺酰氟产物，毕不了业了！
已经有4人回复
-
论文终于录用啦！满足毕业条件了
已经有16人回复
-
投稿Elsevier的杂志（返修），总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
中国科学院大学纳米科学与工程学院唐智勇（院长）-张银团队招聘启事
+1/172
-
上海大学昝鹏教授、军事医学研究院伯晓晨研究员/倪铭副研究员 课题组招聘博士生
+1/95
-
限广州，征女友
+2/94
-
科瑞赛生物内皮细胞培养基试用装限时大放送，助力你的实验高效进阶！
+1/87
-
澳门大学智慧城市物联网国重“结构智能感知、健康监测与无损检测”研究方向博士后招聘
+1/79
-
成都理工大学全国重点实验室公开诚聘绿色有机合成方向联培生及科研助理
+1/78
-
上海大学管理学院阳发军教授课题组全职博士/博士后招聘启事
+1/77
-
希望你在这里
+1/64
-
考核制博士自荐
+1/43
-
新年快乐！祝各位诸事顺遂！
+1/40
-
厦门大学航空航天学院智能制造课题组招2026年申请审核制博士生1-2名
+1/39
-
征女友 @长安
+1/24
-
【博士后/科研助理招聘-北京理工大学-集成电路与电子学院-国家杰青团队】
+1/6
-
上海交通大学诚聘联培博士后
+3/6
-
土木、交通工程专业博士后站有吗？（无博士毕业3年要求+可接受兼职博后）
+1/5
-
西南交通大学李义兵课题组博士及博士后招聘
+1/4
-
中科院理化技术研究所周敏教授招生
+1/3
-
中国矿业大学黄赳课题组联合中国科学院南京土壤研究所朱晓芳研究员诚聘博士后
+1/2
-
上海理工大学 生物医学工程专业 招收2026年全日制博士生一名
+1/1
-
👉划重点！硼替佐米药物研发质控必备
+1/1
35楼2022-04-18 16:42:23
★ ★ ★
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
paperhunter: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2017-09-08 00:36:05
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
paperhunter: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2017-09-08 00:36:05
|
其他的理解基本到位 Please make sure your conclusions' sectionunderscore the scientific value added of your paper, and/or the applicability of your findings/results. Highlight the novelty of your study. Clearly discuss what the previous studies that you are referring to are. （这句话表达的意思是什么？） 意思是让你在结论中对你文中的核心数据进行阐述。并突出你研究的亮点~对比分析本研究内容与前人相关研究内容的差异 |
» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）
13楼2017-09-06 20:13:35
14楼2017-09-06 22:47:53
简单回复
zyren1232楼
2017-09-06 09:25
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
顶 发自小木虫Android客户端
慢性子先生3楼
2017-09-06 09:30
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。。。 发自小木虫Android客户端
嘉平岚6楼
2017-09-06 09:58
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫IOS客户端
dsctg7楼
2017-09-06 11:21
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
好 发自小木虫Android客户端
xqyqwy8楼
2017-09-06 11:25
回复
超级老快9楼
2017-09-06 11:29
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端