| 查看: 13587 | 回复: 35 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
大家交流Journal of Cleaner Production编辑意见
|
|||
|
前天submitted,昨天rejected 主编希望修改后重投,可是责任编辑的一些问题有点难以捉摸,提供原件与大家交流下 Ms. Ref. No.: JCLEPRO-D-17-06182 Title: XXX Journal of Cleaner Production Dear Professor XXX, Thank you for considering Journal of Cleaner Production. Although you have an interesting and valuable paper, the paper needs to be substantial improved before it can be considered for Journal of Cleaner Production. Below please find editor's comments for your guidance. We hope you can consider improving the manuscript accordingly and resubmitting it as a new article. Meanwhile, we hope that the articles we have published in the Journal of Cleaner Production will continue to be useful for you and your colleagues in research and teaching. Yours sincerely, XXX Co-Editor-in-Chief Journal of Cleaner Production Reviewers' comments: Thank you for your interest in JCLP as a target outlet to submit a result of your fine research work. However, this manuscript failed to clearly show contribution to the body of knowledge JCLP has been developing. I also suggest you to re-read the instruction for authors and the journal's scope.(是说稿件与期刊主旨不符吗?) As it is, the paper seems more a technical report, please use the literature background to broaden the manuscript foundation.(所谓的use the literature background to broaden the manuscript foundation是指在introduction充分利用相关文献部分拓展、提升论文基调吗?) Please develop a much better title. This one does not state what is important to catch the prospective reader's attention. Underscore the scientific value added of your paper in your abstract. Please look at articles we have published for models. Your abstract should clearly state the essence of the problem you are addressing, what you did and what you found and recommend. That will help a prospective reader of the abstract to decide if they wish to read the entire article. Please make sure your conclusions' section underscore the scientific value added of your paper, and/or the applicability of your findings/results. Highlight the novelty of your study. Clearly discuss what the previous studies that you are referring to are. (这句话表达的意思是什么?)What are the Research Gaps/Contributions. The paper is very experimental, and discussion and conclusions clearly do not establish a strong correlation with cleaner production/sustainability/environmental concerns (结果与讨论需要往这三个方面靠拢吗?). In your discussion section please link your empirical results with a broader and deeper literature review(文献支撑自己的主要结论?). In your conclusions, please discuss the implications of your research. Grammar and syntax must be improved. Revision with the help of a native English speaker is highly recommended. I hope that the feedback I provided should be useful for authors and I recommend to take more time and care if submitting a revised version of the manuscript. |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
» 猜你喜欢
自荐读博
已经有9人回复
投稿Elsevier的杂志(返修),总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
自然科学基金委宣布启动申请书“瘦身提质”行动
已经有4人回复
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
福建师范大学柔性电子学院招收2026年博士(储能材料与柔性电子器件)
+1/86
澳门大学智慧城市物联网国重“结构智能感知、健康监测与无损检测”研究方向博士后招聘
+1/86
成都理工大学全国重点实验室公开诚聘绿色有机合成方向联培生及科研助理
+1/79
上海大学管理学院阳发军教授课题组全职博士/博士后招聘启事
+1/78
昆明理工大学冶能院离子液体冶金课题组招收博士
+1/65
87 年东北小哥定居苏州(沪杭亦可),诚寻携手余生的你
+1/60
中国科学院深海所 招收2026秋入学博士生1名 申请-考核制
+1/44
2026博士申请——有机化学\计算化学\药物化学方向
+1/44
华中科技大学龚江研究员课题组诚招博士研究生、科研助理和博士后
+2/40
福建师范大学柔性电子学院招收2026年博士(储能材料与柔性电子器件)
+2/40
北京林业大学木质素高值化利用创新团队招收2026年入学博士生
+1/32
暨南大学理工学院 光子技术研究院段宣明团队申请制读博招生
+1/27
【AI、水文方向】香港科技大学(广州)研究助理招聘
+1/26
中科院深圳理工大学网络课题组招聘博后/RA/实习生
+1/13
吉林大学材料物理本科生求问调剂信息
+1/11
中科院动物所招收2026年博士生(优先少干专项计划、化学或生命科学背景)
+1/10
从业之感悟
+2/8
中国科学院苏州纳米所院士团队博士后岗位招聘
+1/7
上海大学昝鹏教授、军事医学研究院伯晓晨研究员/倪铭副研究员 课题组招聘博士生
+2/6
福州大学梁宇航副教授招收2026年申核制博士研究生/硕士研究生(理论计算方向)
+1/3
★ ★ ★
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
paperhunter: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2017-09-08 00:36:05
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
paperhunter: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2017-09-08 00:36:05
|
其他的理解基本到位 Please make sure your conclusions' sectionunderscore the scientific value added of your paper, and/or the applicability of your findings/results. Highlight the novelty of your study. Clearly discuss what the previous studies that you are referring to are. (这句话表达的意思是什么?) 意思是让你在结论中对你文中的核心数据进行阐述。并突出你研究的亮点~对比分析本研究内容与前人相关研究内容的差异 |
13楼2017-09-06 20:13:35
14楼2017-09-06 22:47:53
简单回复
zyren1232楼
2017-09-06 09:25
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
顶 发自小木虫Android客户端
慢性子先生3楼
2017-09-06 09:30
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。。。 发自小木虫Android客户端
嘉平岚6楼
2017-09-06 09:58
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫IOS客户端
dsctg7楼
2017-09-06 11:21
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
好 发自小木虫Android客户端
xqyqwy8楼
2017-09-06 11:25
回复
超级老快9楼
2017-09-06 11:29
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端







回复此楼
sangzhi32