| 查看: 13548 | 回复: 35 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
大家交流Journal of Cleaner Production编辑意见
|
|||
|
前天submitted,昨天rejected 主编希望修改后重投,可是责任编辑的一些问题有点难以捉摸,提供原件与大家交流下 Ms. Ref. No.: JCLEPRO-D-17-06182 Title: XXX Journal of Cleaner Production Dear Professor XXX, Thank you for considering Journal of Cleaner Production. Although you have an interesting and valuable paper, the paper needs to be substantial improved before it can be considered for Journal of Cleaner Production. Below please find editor's comments for your guidance. We hope you can consider improving the manuscript accordingly and resubmitting it as a new article. Meanwhile, we hope that the articles we have published in the Journal of Cleaner Production will continue to be useful for you and your colleagues in research and teaching. Yours sincerely, XXX Co-Editor-in-Chief Journal of Cleaner Production Reviewers' comments: Thank you for your interest in JCLP as a target outlet to submit a result of your fine research work. However, this manuscript failed to clearly show contribution to the body of knowledge JCLP has been developing. I also suggest you to re-read the instruction for authors and the journal's scope.(是说稿件与期刊主旨不符吗?) As it is, the paper seems more a technical report, please use the literature background to broaden the manuscript foundation.(所谓的use the literature background to broaden the manuscript foundation是指在introduction充分利用相关文献部分拓展、提升论文基调吗?) Please develop a much better title. This one does not state what is important to catch the prospective reader's attention. Underscore the scientific value added of your paper in your abstract. Please look at articles we have published for models. Your abstract should clearly state the essence of the problem you are addressing, what you did and what you found and recommend. That will help a prospective reader of the abstract to decide if they wish to read the entire article. Please make sure your conclusions' section underscore the scientific value added of your paper, and/or the applicability of your findings/results. Highlight the novelty of your study. Clearly discuss what the previous studies that you are referring to are. (这句话表达的意思是什么?)What are the Research Gaps/Contributions. The paper is very experimental, and discussion and conclusions clearly do not establish a strong correlation with cleaner production/sustainability/environmental concerns (结果与讨论需要往这三个方面靠拢吗?). In your discussion section please link your empirical results with a broader and deeper literature review(文献支撑自己的主要结论?). In your conclusions, please discuss the implications of your research. Grammar and syntax must be improved. Revision with the help of a native English speaker is highly recommended. I hope that the feedback I provided should be useful for authors and I recommend to take more time and care if submitting a revised version of the manuscript. |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
» 猜你喜欢
2025冷门绝学什么时候出结果
已经有3人回复
天津工业大学郑柳春团队欢迎化学化工、高分子化学或有机合成方向的博士生和硕士生加入
已经有4人回复
康复大学泰山学者周祺惠团队招收博士研究生
已经有6人回复
AI论文写作工具:是科研加速器还是学术作弊器?
已经有3人回复
孩子确诊有中度注意力缺陷
已经有6人回复
2026博士申请-功能高分子,水凝胶方向
已经有6人回复
论文投稿,期刊推荐
已经有4人回复
硕士和导师闹得不愉快
已经有13人回复
请问2026国家基金面上项目会启动申2停1吗
已经有5人回复
同一篇文章,用不同账号投稿对编辑决定是否送审有没有影响?
已经有3人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
湘潭大学化学学院理论与计算化学课题组裴勇教授招生博士生2名
+2/94
湘潭大学化学学院陈华杰教授课题组招收有机/高分子方向的博士研究生
+1/82
华中科技大学2026级申请考核制博士生1名-新型共轭MOF/COF合成及其超电应用方向
+1/79
国家青年人才叶立群教授课题组招收2026级博士研究生
+1/37
中国科学院深圳先进技术研究院余敏课题组招聘研究助理
+5/30
宁波大学张天宇教授课题组招聘副教授/讲师
+1/29
中山大学院士团队王来源教授课题组招聘博士后
+2/20
南京大学能源与资源学院蔡亮课题组诚招博士后、助理研究员(AEM、PEM电解水制氢方向)
+1/15
现代材料与先进制造团队硕士生、博士生以及博士毕业生招收公告
+1/9
湘潭大学2026年招收 力学 博士研究生2名(“申请-考核制”、硕博连读)
+1/7
东莞理工学院-大连化物所联合招聘光催化方向博士后2名(年薪48W)
+1/7
诚招博士后及研究人员
+1/6
海南大学生物医学工程学院光免疫诊疗团队诚招神经生物学、光学、分子生物学博士
+1/5
长江大学武汉校区诚招工程热物理、油气、电气等新能源博士-2025
+1/5
南开大学齐迹课题组诚聘博士后
+1/4
三峡集团科研院海上风电研究项目实习生招聘公告
+1/4
有没有一款可以听文献的APP
+1/4
沙特法赫德国王石油与矿产大学(KFUPM)膜分离课题组招生
+1/3
液相方法和氨基酸分析仪有什么不一样?
+1/3
上海交通大学 魏小东课题组招收2026年申请考核博士生1 名
+1/1
★ ★ ★
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
paperhunter: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2017-09-08 00:36:05
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
paperhunter: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2017-09-08 00:36:05
|
其他的理解基本到位 Please make sure your conclusions' sectionunderscore the scientific value added of your paper, and/or the applicability of your findings/results. Highlight the novelty of your study. Clearly discuss what the previous studies that you are referring to are. (这句话表达的意思是什么?) 意思是让你在结论中对你文中的核心数据进行阐述。并突出你研究的亮点~对比分析本研究内容与前人相关研究内容的差异 |
13楼2017-09-06 20:13:35
14楼2017-09-06 22:47:53
简单回复
zyren1232楼
2017-09-06 09:25
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
顶 发自小木虫Android客户端
慢性子先生3楼
2017-09-06 09:30
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。。。 发自小木虫Android客户端
嘉平岚6楼
2017-09-06 09:58
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫IOS客户端
dsctg7楼
2017-09-06 11:21
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
好 发自小木虫Android客户端
xqyqwy8楼
2017-09-06 11:25
回复
超级老快9楼
2017-09-06 11:29
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端













回复此楼
sangzhi32