| 查看: 13589 | 回复: 35 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
大家交流Journal of Cleaner Production编辑意见
|
|||
|
前天submitted,昨天rejected 主编希望修改后重投,可是责任编辑的一些问题有点难以捉摸,提供原件与大家交流下 Ms. Ref. No.: JCLEPRO-D-17-06182 Title: XXX Journal of Cleaner Production Dear Professor XXX, Thank you for considering Journal of Cleaner Production. Although you have an interesting and valuable paper, the paper needs to be substantial improved before it can be considered for Journal of Cleaner Production. Below please find editor's comments for your guidance. We hope you can consider improving the manuscript accordingly and resubmitting it as a new article. Meanwhile, we hope that the articles we have published in the Journal of Cleaner Production will continue to be useful for you and your colleagues in research and teaching. Yours sincerely, XXX Co-Editor-in-Chief Journal of Cleaner Production Reviewers' comments: Thank you for your interest in JCLP as a target outlet to submit a result of your fine research work. However, this manuscript failed to clearly show contribution to the body of knowledge JCLP has been developing. I also suggest you to re-read the instruction for authors and the journal's scope.(是说稿件与期刊主旨不符吗?) As it is, the paper seems more a technical report, please use the literature background to broaden the manuscript foundation.(所谓的use the literature background to broaden the manuscript foundation是指在introduction充分利用相关文献部分拓展、提升论文基调吗?) Please develop a much better title. This one does not state what is important to catch the prospective reader's attention. Underscore the scientific value added of your paper in your abstract. Please look at articles we have published for models. Your abstract should clearly state the essence of the problem you are addressing, what you did and what you found and recommend. That will help a prospective reader of the abstract to decide if they wish to read the entire article. Please make sure your conclusions' section underscore the scientific value added of your paper, and/or the applicability of your findings/results. Highlight the novelty of your study. Clearly discuss what the previous studies that you are referring to are. (这句话表达的意思是什么?)What are the Research Gaps/Contributions. The paper is very experimental, and discussion and conclusions clearly do not establish a strong correlation with cleaner production/sustainability/environmental concerns (结果与讨论需要往这三个方面靠拢吗?). In your discussion section please link your empirical results with a broader and deeper literature review(文献支撑自己的主要结论?). In your conclusions, please discuss the implications of your research. Grammar and syntax must be improved. Revision with the help of a native English speaker is highly recommended. I hope that the feedback I provided should be useful for authors and I recommend to take more time and care if submitting a revised version of the manuscript. |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
» 猜你喜欢
自荐读博
已经有9人回复
投稿Elsevier的杂志(返修),总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
自然科学基金委宣布启动申请书“瘦身提质”行动
已经有4人回复
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
澳门大学智慧城市物联网国重“结构智能感知、健康监测与无损检测”研究方向博士后招聘
+1/86
成都理工大学全国重点实验室公开诚聘绿色有机合成方向联培生及科研助理
+1/79
江苏科技大学能源材料化学课题组张俊豪教授招收博士研究生1-2名
+1/71
希望你在这里
+1/71
昆明理工大学冶能院离子液体冶金课题组招收博士
+1/65
87 年东北小哥定居苏州(沪杭亦可),诚寻携手余生的你
+1/60
香港理工大学-应用生物与化学科技学系 招收2025年博士研究生
+2/56
华中科技大学龚江研究员课题组诚招博士研究生、科研助理和博士后
+3/45
衡水学院招收食品与营养方向联合培养研究生
+1/30
西南交通大学前沿院碳中和与物质循环利用课题组招收博士生
+1/29
征女友 @长安
+1/29
长江学者团队招聘药学/生物信息学等方向高校教师7名(地点杭州、有事业编)+博后5名
+1/18
国家级人才课题组招收生物学相关专业2026年入学博士生
+1/12
求问欧洲陶瓷JECS审稿周期
+1/11
重庆大学前沿院,黄小洋教授课题组,招收2026年非均相催化方向学术博士2名
+1/9
代算!材料学理论计算
+1/6
上海大学昝鹏教授、军事医学研究院伯晓晨研究员/倪铭副研究员 课题组招聘博士生
+2/6
求博导收留
+1/5
上海理工大学“新能源材料”专业-赵斌教授招收申请考核制博士生【能源催化方向】
+1/3
上海交通大学浦江国际学院 2026年度“科研见习项目”报名通知
+1/3
31楼2020-01-05 00:40:06
★ ★ ★
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
paperhunter: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2017-09-08 00:36:05
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
paperhunter: 金币+2, 鼓励交流 2017-09-08 00:36:05
|
其他的理解基本到位 Please make sure your conclusions' sectionunderscore the scientific value added of your paper, and/or the applicability of your findings/results. Highlight the novelty of your study. Clearly discuss what the previous studies that you are referring to are. (这句话表达的意思是什么?) 意思是让你在结论中对你文中的核心数据进行阐述。并突出你研究的亮点~对比分析本研究内容与前人相关研究内容的差异 |
» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)
13楼2017-09-06 20:13:35
14楼2017-09-06 22:47:53
简单回复
zyren1232楼
2017-09-06 09:25
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
顶 发自小木虫Android客户端
慢性子先生3楼
2017-09-06 09:30
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。。。 发自小木虫Android客户端
嘉平岚6楼
2017-09-06 09:58
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫IOS客户端
dsctg7楼
2017-09-06 11:21
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
好 发自小木虫Android客户端
xqyqwy8楼
2017-09-06 11:25
回复
超级老快9楼
2017-09-06 11:29
回复
273180219(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端







回复此楼
sangzhi32