| 查看: 4104 | 回复: 24 | |||
[交流]
拒稿,重投?
|
|||
|
大修后拒稿,一审,一正一负 系统上显示reject, ![]() ![]() ![]() 但是编辑信里这么写的: Dear Mr. XXX XXX, Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject it. For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below. You can improve the work based on the reviewers' reports and submit your improved work as a new submission. The comments made by the reviewers should be better taken of. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Yours sincerely, XXXXXXX Reviewer #3: The manuscript performs an experimental study on XXXXXXXXXXXX. The authors developed a XXXXXX model and tried to explain the oscillations showed in XXXXXXX. Besides those comments raised by other reviewers, I think, the authors need to clarify the major issues listed below: (1) The biggest problem for this work may be the organization of the paper. Clearly, there are both experimental results and theoretical analysis in the presents. That is, two approaches are used. But just when we look at the titles of the sections for the parts of results and discussion, it is difficult to tell the results from experiments or from the stratified model. The authors are encouraged to rework and reorganized the part of results and discussion to make it clear. (2) There is a feeling that the experimental measurements of the mean bed porosity lose some "connection" with the results predicted by the theoretical stratified model. This can be seen from the comparison of XX and XX. As clearly shown in XXX, the XXXXX fluctuates in a small amplitude when D/d>2.5. But in Fig. 7(a), the authors only provide the predicted smooth values of mean porosity (by the theoretical stratified model) in small range of XXXX, although one may find fluctuating results for other variables of XXX at XXXXX. What about the predicted XXXXXXXX (by the theoretical XXXXX model) at higher XXXXXXX? So I would suggest the authors perform a direct comparison of the measured and predicted XXXXXXXX, to demonstrate if the measurements and predictions could really fluctuate in a similar pace or a pattern showing a correlation. (3) It seems there are data repeatedly presenting for the parameter XXXXX in Fig. 7(b), 8(b) and 9, although they are shown in different range of D/d. (4) Two same symbols of 'D' in Table 2. Which one is for cylinder column diameter and which one for particle diameter? There may be some typos here. Based on the above comments, I can NOT recommend the acceptance of the present paper for publication in this journal. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 这样的意见算不算reject&resubmit?重投需要注意哪些问题呢? |
» 猜你喜欢
不自信的我
已经有5人回复
磺酰氟产物,毕不了业了!
已经有4人回复
论文终于录用啦!满足毕业条件了
已经有16人回复
投稿Elsevier的杂志(返修),总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
求一个访问学者邀请函,非常非常感谢
+1/696
限广州,征女友
+2/94
上海大学昝鹏教授、军事医学研究院伯晓晨研究员/倪铭副研究员 课题组招聘博士生
+1/94
DNA甲基化位点定量试剂盒(qPCR版)-适合特定基因位点5mC定量检测
+1/91
江苏科技大学能源材料化学课题组张俊豪教授招收博士研究生1-2名
+1/71
2026博士申请——有机化学\计算化学\药物化学方向
+1/44
急招碳材料相关特任研究人员/博士后/科研助理/26级博士和硕士
+1/43
考核制博士自荐
+1/43
新年快乐!祝各位诸事顺遂!
+1/40
华中科技大学龚江研究员课题组诚招博士研究生、科研助理和博士后
+2/34
可以用同一个研究内容申请青C和博士后面上吗
+1/27
南京工业大学招收2026年全日制学术博士(供热、供燃气通风与空调)
+1/14
中科院深圳理工大学网络课题组招聘博后/RA/实习生
+1/12
吉林大学材料物理本科生求问调剂信息
+1/11
废旧塑料热解油采购
+1/4
海南大学化学院—功能分子器件团队2026博士/研究助理招生
+1/4
英国博导招CSC博士生
+1/2
求博导收留
+1/1
抗体制剂「隐形杀手」:如何用 QCM-D 实时捕捉亚可见颗粒的形成?
+1/1
抗体制剂「隐形杀手」:如何用 QCM-D 实时捕捉亚可见颗粒的形成?
+1/1
★ ★
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
郭梓歌(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-08-10 08:12:10
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
郭梓歌(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-08-10 08:12:10
|
按照reviewer的意见认真修改之后再投就可以了 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
6楼2017-08-09 21:12:45
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
|
大概意思就是论文写得有点乱,人家审稿人觉得调理不清晰吧?感觉审稿人没有否定你的模型和你的工作,你按他说的好好改改再重新投这个期刊呗? 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
24楼2018-10-09 00:15:13
2楼2017-08-09 21:07:49
5楼2017-08-09 21:11:14
7楼2017-08-09 21:14:10
8楼2017-08-09 21:15:38
9楼2017-08-09 21:17:01
12楼2017-08-09 21:20:03
16楼2017-08-09 21:25:50
20楼2017-08-09 22:59:04
21楼2017-08-09 23:06:07
22楼2017-08-09 23:06:23
25楼2018-12-05 15:11:43
简单回复
2017-08-09 21:09
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
看不尽的风景4楼
2017-08-09 21:09
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
南男10楼
2017-08-09 21:17
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
无痕但11楼
2017-08-09 21:19
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
j 发自小木虫Android客户端
nono200913楼
2017-08-09 21:21
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
wyq17614楼
2017-08-09 21:23
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
嗯 发自小木虫Android客户端
wangli520815楼
2017-08-09 21:24
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
yaoyao14517楼
2017-08-09 21:26
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
y 发自小木虫IOS客户端
sz_kebaoyuan18楼
2017-08-09 22:55
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
逝水无痕199019楼
2017-08-09 22:57
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
baggiotalent23楼
2017-08-10 12:57
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与








回复此楼