| 查看: 4365 | 回复: 24 | |||
[交流]
拒稿，重投？
|
|||
|
大修后拒稿，一审，一正一负 系统上显示reject，  但是编辑信里这么写的： Dear Mr. XXX XXX, Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject it. For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below. You can improve the work based on the reviewers' reports and submit your improved work as a new submission. The comments made by the reviewers should be better taken of. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Yours sincerely, XXXXXXX Reviewer #3: The manuscript performs an experimental study on XXXXXXXXXXXX. The authors developed a XXXXXX model and tried to explain the oscillations showed in XXXXXXX. Besides those comments raised by other reviewers, I think, the authors need to clarify the major issues listed below: (1) The biggest problem for this work may be the organization of the paper. Clearly, there are both experimental results and theoretical analysis in the presents. That is, two approaches are used. But just when we look at the titles of the sections for the parts of results and discussion, it is difficult to tell the results from experiments or from the stratified model. The authors are encouraged to rework and reorganized the part of results and discussion to make it clear. (2) There is a feeling that the experimental measurements of the mean bed porosity lose some "connection" with the results predicted by the theoretical stratified model. This can be seen from the comparison of XX and XX. As clearly shown in XXX, the XXXXX fluctuates in a small amplitude when D/d>2.5. But in Fig. 7(a), the authors only provide the predicted smooth values of mean porosity (by the theoretical stratified model) in small range of XXXX, although one may find fluctuating results for other variables of XXX at XXXXX. What about the predicted XXXXXXXX (by the theoretical XXXXX model) at higher XXXXXXX? So I would suggest the authors perform a direct comparison of the measured and predicted XXXXXXXX, to demonstrate if the measurements and predictions could really fluctuate in a similar pace or a pattern showing a correlation. (3) It seems there are data repeatedly presenting for the parameter XXXXX in Fig. 7(b), 8(b) and 9, although they are shown in different range of D/d. (4) Two same symbols of 'D' in Table 2. Which one is for cylinder column diameter and which one for particle diameter？ There may be some typos here. Based on the above comments, I can NOT recommend the acceptance of the present paper for publication in this journal. 这样的意见算不算reject&resubmit？重投需要注意哪些问题呢？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
有多少人是今天查系统知道结果的？
已经有17人回复
-
国自然面上复盘~欢迎讨论
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI一区文章，我:8.O.551.O.5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
基金不中，共勉
已经有5人回复
-
看板上这么多中的，有点像50人群里49个人都是骗子的那种感觉……
已经有3人回复
-
我不理解！
已经有23人回复
-
2026年的国家社科基金项目通讯评审的新规则与新动向、新挑战
已经有10人回复
-
系统查不到
已经有10人回复
-
怎么查啊
已经有5人回复
★ ★
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
郭梓歌(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-08-10 08:12:10
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
郭梓歌(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-08-10 08:12:10
|
按照reviewer的意见认真修改之后再投就可以了 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
6楼2017-08-09 21:12:45
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
大概意思就是论文写得有点乱，人家审稿人觉得调理不清晰吧？感觉审稿人没有否定你的模型和你的工作，你按他说的好好改改再重新投这个期刊呗？ 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
24楼2018-10-09 00:15:13
2楼2017-08-09 21:07:49
5楼2017-08-09 21:11:14
7楼2017-08-09 21:14:10
8楼2017-08-09 21:15:38
9楼2017-08-09 21:17:01
12楼2017-08-09 21:20:03
16楼2017-08-09 21:25:50
20楼2017-08-09 22:59:04
21楼2017-08-09 23:06:07
22楼2017-08-09 23:06:23
25楼2018-12-05 15:11:43
简单回复
2017-08-09 21:09
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
看不尽的风景4楼
2017-08-09 21:09
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
南男10楼
2017-08-09 21:17
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
无痕但11楼
2017-08-09 21:19
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
j 发自小木虫Android客户端
nono200913楼
2017-08-09 21:21
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
wyq17614楼
2017-08-09 21:23
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
嗯 发自小木虫Android客户端
wangli520815楼
2017-08-09 21:24
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
yaoyao14517楼
2017-08-09 21:26
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
y 发自小木虫IOS客户端
sz_kebaoyuan18楼
2017-08-09 22:55
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
逝水无痕199019楼
2017-08-09 22:57
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
baggiotalent23楼
2017-08-10 12:57
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
