| 查看: 4128 | 回复: 24 | |||
[交流]
拒稿,重投?
|
|||
|
大修后拒稿,一审,一正一负 系统上显示reject, ![]() ![]() ![]() 但是编辑信里这么写的: Dear Mr. XXX XXX, Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject it. For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below. You can improve the work based on the reviewers' reports and submit your improved work as a new submission. The comments made by the reviewers should be better taken of. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Yours sincerely, XXXXXXX Reviewer #3: The manuscript performs an experimental study on XXXXXXXXXXXX. The authors developed a XXXXXX model and tried to explain the oscillations showed in XXXXXXX. Besides those comments raised by other reviewers, I think, the authors need to clarify the major issues listed below: (1) The biggest problem for this work may be the organization of the paper. Clearly, there are both experimental results and theoretical analysis in the presents. That is, two approaches are used. But just when we look at the titles of the sections for the parts of results and discussion, it is difficult to tell the results from experiments or from the stratified model. The authors are encouraged to rework and reorganized the part of results and discussion to make it clear. (2) There is a feeling that the experimental measurements of the mean bed porosity lose some "connection" with the results predicted by the theoretical stratified model. This can be seen from the comparison of XX and XX. As clearly shown in XXX, the XXXXX fluctuates in a small amplitude when D/d>2.5. But in Fig. 7(a), the authors only provide the predicted smooth values of mean porosity (by the theoretical stratified model) in small range of XXXX, although one may find fluctuating results for other variables of XXX at XXXXX. What about the predicted XXXXXXXX (by the theoretical XXXXX model) at higher XXXXXXX? So I would suggest the authors perform a direct comparison of the measured and predicted XXXXXXXX, to demonstrate if the measurements and predictions could really fluctuate in a similar pace or a pattern showing a correlation. (3) It seems there are data repeatedly presenting for the parameter XXXXX in Fig. 7(b), 8(b) and 9, although they are shown in different range of D/d. (4) Two same symbols of 'D' in Table 2. Which one is for cylinder column diameter and which one for particle diameter? There may be some typos here. Based on the above comments, I can NOT recommend the acceptance of the present paper for publication in this journal. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 这样的意见算不算reject&resubmit?重投需要注意哪些问题呢? |
» 猜你喜欢
0854控制工程 359求调剂 可跨专业
已经有9人回复
梁成伟老师课题组欢迎你的加入
已经有9人回复
化学调剂0703
已经有8人回复
环境工程调剂
已经有6人回复
326求调剂
已经有7人回复
一志愿985,本科211,0817化学工程与技术319求调剂
已经有5人回复
今年的国基金是打分制吗?
已经有3人回复
304求调剂
已经有5人回复
一志愿苏州大学材料工程(085601)专硕有科研经历三项国奖两个实用型专利一项省级立项
已经有5人回复
304求调剂
已经有4人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
南京医科大学生殖医学与子代健康国重实验室-董飞宏课题组-学术硕士招生
+1/105
物理学 调剂
+1/84
福建师范大学招收2026年化学、材料硕士3-4名
+1/82
哈工大本部-电化学新能源方向博士捡漏名额
+1/77
Call for paper: Frontiers in Plant Science 中科院2区
+2/56
华南师范大学(211)博士招生- 电子、自动化、机械、生物学、物理相关专业
+2/42
中科院生态环境研究中心国重实验室招聘客座研究生1-2名
+1/31
2026年工科硕士调剂-上海大学全国重点实验室团队-材料数据挖掘方向-研究生3-5人
+1/31
澳大利亚西澳大学(UWA)张金强课题组招收全奖博士生(化工新能源方向)
+1/27
华南师范大学(211)博士招生- 电子、自动化、机械、生物学、物理相关专业
+1/25
南京林业大学-国家级青年人才团队 招2026级申请考核制博士(合成化学、植物化学方向)
+1/19
医学327分专硕调剂
+1/16
福建师范大学化学与材料学院杜克钊团队博士/硕士招生
+1/14
【实战型】【生物医药】2026青岛大学招博士生 含少数民族骨干计划2名!!!
+1/11
中国民航飞行学院先进连接团队招收航空宇航、航空机械专业硕士研究生(学硕专硕均可)
+1/7
南方科技大学生命科学学院基础免疫与微生物学系招收博士后
+1/5
求推荐性价比好用的球磨罐
+1/3
西交利物浦大学(苏州)/刘雯老师课题组/招博士研究生
+1/3
药学专硕一志愿苏大本科苏大寻求B区高校调剂名额
+1/2
澳洲维多利亚大学计算机类全额奖学金博士招生 (邮箱+微信可联系)
+1/1
★ ★
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
郭梓歌(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-08-10 08:12:10
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
郭梓歌(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-08-10 08:12:10
|
按照reviewer的意见认真修改之后再投就可以了 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
6楼2017-08-09 21:12:45
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
|
大概意思就是论文写得有点乱,人家审稿人觉得调理不清晰吧?感觉审稿人没有否定你的模型和你的工作,你按他说的好好改改再重新投这个期刊呗? 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
24楼2018-10-09 00:15:13
2楼2017-08-09 21:07:49
5楼2017-08-09 21:11:14
7楼2017-08-09 21:14:10
8楼2017-08-09 21:15:38
9楼2017-08-09 21:17:01
12楼2017-08-09 21:20:03
16楼2017-08-09 21:25:50
20楼2017-08-09 22:59:04
21楼2017-08-09 23:06:07
22楼2017-08-09 23:06:23
25楼2018-12-05 15:11:43
简单回复
2017-08-09 21:09
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
看不尽的风景4楼
2017-08-09 21:09
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
南男10楼
2017-08-09 21:17
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
无痕但11楼
2017-08-09 21:19
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
j 发自小木虫Android客户端
nono200913楼
2017-08-09 21:21
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
wyq17614楼
2017-08-09 21:23
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
嗯 发自小木虫Android客户端
wangli520815楼
2017-08-09 21:24
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
yaoyao14517楼
2017-08-09 21:26
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
y 发自小木虫IOS客户端
sz_kebaoyuan18楼
2017-08-09 22:55
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
逝水无痕199019楼
2017-08-09 22:57
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
baggiotalent23楼
2017-08-10 12:57
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与














回复此楼