| 查看: 4476 | 回复: 24 | |||
[交流]
拒稿,重投?
|
|||
|
大修后拒稿,一审,一正一负 系统上显示reject, ![]() ![]() ![]() 但是编辑信里这么写的: Dear Mr. XXX XXX, Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject it. For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below. You can improve the work based on the reviewers' reports and submit your improved work as a new submission. The comments made by the reviewers should be better taken of. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Yours sincerely, XXXXXXX Reviewer #3: The manuscript performs an experimental study on XXXXXXXXXXXX. The authors developed a XXXXXX model and tried to explain the oscillations showed in XXXXXXX. Besides those comments raised by other reviewers, I think, the authors need to clarify the major issues listed below: (1) The biggest problem for this work may be the organization of the paper. Clearly, there are both experimental results and theoretical analysis in the presents. That is, two approaches are used. But just when we look at the titles of the sections for the parts of results and discussion, it is difficult to tell the results from experiments or from the stratified model. The authors are encouraged to rework and reorganized the part of results and discussion to make it clear. (2) There is a feeling that the experimental measurements of the mean bed porosity lose some "connection" with the results predicted by the theoretical stratified model. This can be seen from the comparison of XX and XX. As clearly shown in XXX, the XXXXX fluctuates in a small amplitude when D/d>2.5. But in Fig. 7(a), the authors only provide the predicted smooth values of mean porosity (by the theoretical stratified model) in small range of XXXX, although one may find fluctuating results for other variables of XXX at XXXXX. What about the predicted XXXXXXXX (by the theoretical XXXXX model) at higher XXXXXXX? So I would suggest the authors perform a direct comparison of the measured and predicted XXXXXXXX, to demonstrate if the measurements and predictions could really fluctuate in a similar pace or a pattern showing a correlation. (3) It seems there are data repeatedly presenting for the parameter XXXXX in Fig. 7(b), 8(b) and 9, although they are shown in different range of D/d. (4) Two same symbols of 'D' in Table 2. Which one is for cylinder column diameter and which one for particle diameter? There may be some typos here. Based on the above comments, I can NOT recommend the acceptance of the present paper for publication in this journal. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 这样的意见算不算reject&resubmit?重投需要注意哪些问题呢? |
» 猜你喜欢
论文的挂名怎么评判贡献?基金申请中,排名第一的挂名文章
已经有3人回复
越来越担心硕士毕业后没有竞争力了
已经有13人回复
申博自荐 2篇一区TOP+1篇EI+2公开发明专利 2027博士申请
已经有3人回复
闲聊
已经有6人回复
申博求助
已经有4人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
论文祝福
+2/660
坐标苏州,诚聘女友
+1/287
大连理工大学机械工程学院招收微纳及原子制造方向博士生
+1/197
中国地质大学杨明教授组招收2027年博士能源化学、催化材料方向(每月5K+)
+4/108
中国地质大学杨明教授组招收2027年博士能源化学、催化材料方向(每月5K+)
+4/108
溶质液晶释放必须用PBS吗?
+1/97
海南大学徐月山招收2027年第一批博士研究生1个
+1/87
南开大学环境科学与工程学院 环境与人体健康方向 招博士研究生、硕士研究生各1名
+1/69
大连理工大学化学学院招收2027级理论计算化学方向博士生
+1/36
浙大许军课题组招聘
+1/19
南京农业大学2027年申请考核制博士招生
+1/10
深圳技术大学招聘天体化学、物理化学领域博士后
+1/8
【招聘】荷兰格罗宁根大学CSC公派博士生,材料/高分子/化学相关背景
+1/7
深圳技术大学招聘天体化学、物理化学领域博士后
+1/6
【2027博士招生】福州大学姚建年院士课题组招收博士研究生2名
+1/5
您身边的科研非标定制专家--赛思睿
+1/4
海南大学化学化工学院|2027级博士招生|生物质材料、光热蒸发、盐差能发电方向
+1/4
二审Required Reviews Complete了
+1/3
中性粒细胞分泌因子:从颗粒蛋白到细胞因子的功能谱系
+1/3
全球扩展虚拟生物学计划:18亿美元资源投向何处?
+1/2
★ ★
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
郭梓歌(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-08-10 08:12:10
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
郭梓歌(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-08-10 08:12:10
|
按照reviewer的意见认真修改之后再投就可以了 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
6楼2017-08-09 21:12:45
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
|
大概意思就是论文写得有点乱,人家审稿人觉得调理不清晰吧?感觉审稿人没有否定你的模型和你的工作,你按他说的好好改改再重新投这个期刊呗? 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
24楼2018-10-09 00:15:13
2楼2017-08-09 21:07:49
5楼2017-08-09 21:11:14
7楼2017-08-09 21:14:10
8楼2017-08-09 21:15:38
9楼2017-08-09 21:17:01
12楼2017-08-09 21:20:03
16楼2017-08-09 21:25:50
20楼2017-08-09 22:59:04
21楼2017-08-09 23:06:07
22楼2017-08-09 23:06:23
25楼2018-12-05 15:11:43
简单回复
2017-08-09 21:09
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
看不尽的风景4楼
2017-08-09 21:09
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
南男10楼
2017-08-09 21:17
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
无痕但11楼
2017-08-09 21:19
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
j 发自小木虫Android客户端
nono200913楼
2017-08-09 21:21
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
wyq17614楼
2017-08-09 21:23
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
嗯 发自小木虫Android客户端
wangli520815楼
2017-08-09 21:24
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
yaoyao14517楼
2017-08-09 21:26
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
y 发自小木虫IOS客户端
sz_kebaoyuan18楼
2017-08-09 22:55
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
逝水无痕199019楼
2017-08-09 22:57
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
baggiotalent23楼
2017-08-10 12:57
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与











回复此楼