| 查看: 4088 | 回复: 24 | |||
[交流]
拒稿，重投？
|
|||
|
大修后拒稿，一审，一正一负 系统上显示reject，  但是编辑信里这么写的： Dear Mr. XXX XXX, Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject it. For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below. You can improve the work based on the reviewers' reports and submit your improved work as a new submission. The comments made by the reviewers should be better taken of. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Yours sincerely, XXXXXXX Reviewer #3: The manuscript performs an experimental study on XXXXXXXXXXXX. The authors developed a XXXXXX model and tried to explain the oscillations showed in XXXXXXX. Besides those comments raised by other reviewers, I think, the authors need to clarify the major issues listed below: (1) The biggest problem for this work may be the organization of the paper. Clearly, there are both experimental results and theoretical analysis in the presents. That is, two approaches are used. But just when we look at the titles of the sections for the parts of results and discussion, it is difficult to tell the results from experiments or from the stratified model. The authors are encouraged to rework and reorganized the part of results and discussion to make it clear. (2) There is a feeling that the experimental measurements of the mean bed porosity lose some "connection" with the results predicted by the theoretical stratified model. This can be seen from the comparison of XX and XX. As clearly shown in XXX, the XXXXX fluctuates in a small amplitude when D/d>2.5. But in Fig. 7(a), the authors only provide the predicted smooth values of mean porosity (by the theoretical stratified model) in small range of XXXX, although one may find fluctuating results for other variables of XXX at XXXXX. What about the predicted XXXXXXXX (by the theoretical XXXXX model) at higher XXXXXXX? So I would suggest the authors perform a direct comparison of the measured and predicted XXXXXXXX, to demonstrate if the measurements and predictions could really fluctuate in a similar pace or a pattern showing a correlation. (3) It seems there are data repeatedly presenting for the parameter XXXXX in Fig. 7(b), 8(b) and 9, although they are shown in different range of D/d. (4) Two same symbols of 'D' in Table 2. Which one is for cylinder column diameter and which one for particle diameter？ There may be some typos here. Based on the above comments, I can NOT recommend the acceptance of the present paper for publication in this journal. 这样的意见算不算reject&resubmit？重投需要注意哪些问题呢？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
垃圾破二本职称评审标准
已经有19人回复
-
职称评审没过，求安慰
已经有53人回复
-
毕业后当辅导员了，天天各种学生超烦
已经有5人回复
-
26申博自荐
已经有3人回复
-
A期刊撤稿
已经有4人回复
» 抢金币啦！回帖就可以得到:
-
散金祈福
+1/612
-
双一流南京医科大学招计算机、AI、统计、生物信息等方向26年9月入学博士
+1/183
-
湖南师范大学蒋乐勇教授课题组招收2026届“申请-考核”制博士生
+1/175
-
《春节催婚季，90后男生在线“招募”战友，一起过个轻松年》
+1/155
-
Analytical Science Advances（Wiley出版社）长期征稿中...
+1/87
-
中科院深圳先进院成会明院士\唐永炳国家杰青团队招聘
+2/44
-
限广州，征女友
+2/34
-
南京-栖霞区-尧化门附件有房子出租吗？
+1/31
-
中国中化 下设二级全资公司 中国化工橡胶有限公司 2025-2026年度校招秋招补录开始啦~
+1/28
-
博士后招聘
+1/27
-
上海大学昝鹏教授、军事医学研究院伯晓晨研究员/倪铭副研究员 课题组招聘博士生
+2/16
-
肿瘤免疫课题组招聘 博后
+1/14
-
口腔健康的标准
+1/12
-
中国地质大学（武汉）戴志高课题组诚招2026级硕博研究生
+1/5
-
北京师范大学与企业联合招聘博士后、全职、兼职人员
+1/5
-
诚邀博士后合作研究人员
+1/4
-
实验室研究员
+1/4
-
河南师范大学植物生殖生物学科研团队博士招聘
+1/3
-
诚招“先进材料与柔性电子（柔性储能或柔性天线）”方向联培博士生
+1/2
-
中国科大电池方向任晓迪课题组招收2026级博士生-电解液/电池安全性/人工智能方向
+1/1
★ ★
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
郭梓歌(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-08-10 08:12:10
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
郭梓歌(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-08-10 08:12:10
|
按照reviewer的意见认真修改之后再投就可以了 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
6楼2017-08-09 21:12:45
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
|
大概意思就是论文写得有点乱，人家审稿人觉得调理不清晰吧？感觉审稿人没有否定你的模型和你的工作，你按他说的好好改改再重新投这个期刊呗？ 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
24楼2018-10-09 00:15:13
2楼2017-08-09 21:07:49
5楼2017-08-09 21:11:14
7楼2017-08-09 21:14:10
8楼2017-08-09 21:15:38
9楼2017-08-09 21:17:01
12楼2017-08-09 21:20:03
16楼2017-08-09 21:25:50
20楼2017-08-09 22:59:04
21楼2017-08-09 23:06:07
22楼2017-08-09 23:06:23
25楼2018-12-05 15:11:43
简单回复
2017-08-09 21:09
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
看不尽的风景4楼
2017-08-09 21:09
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
南男10楼
2017-08-09 21:17
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
无痕但11楼
2017-08-09 21:19
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
j 发自小木虫Android客户端
nono200913楼
2017-08-09 21:21
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
wyq17614楼
2017-08-09 21:23
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
嗯 发自小木虫Android客户端
wangli520815楼
2017-08-09 21:24
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
yaoyao14517楼
2017-08-09 21:26
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
y 发自小木虫IOS客户端
sz_kebaoyuan18楼
2017-08-09 22:55
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
逝水无痕199019楼
2017-08-09 22:57
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
baggiotalent23楼
2017-08-10 12:57
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
