| 查看: 4251 | 回复: 24 | |||
[交流]
拒稿,重投?
|
|||
|
大修后拒稿,一审,一正一负 系统上显示reject, ![]() ![]() ![]() 但是编辑信里这么写的: Dear Mr. XXX XXX, Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject it. For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below. You can improve the work based on the reviewers' reports and submit your improved work as a new submission. The comments made by the reviewers should be better taken of. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Yours sincerely, XXXXXXX Reviewer #3: The manuscript performs an experimental study on XXXXXXXXXXXX. The authors developed a XXXXXX model and tried to explain the oscillations showed in XXXXXXX. Besides those comments raised by other reviewers, I think, the authors need to clarify the major issues listed below: (1) The biggest problem for this work may be the organization of the paper. Clearly, there are both experimental results and theoretical analysis in the presents. That is, two approaches are used. But just when we look at the titles of the sections for the parts of results and discussion, it is difficult to tell the results from experiments or from the stratified model. The authors are encouraged to rework and reorganized the part of results and discussion to make it clear. (2) There is a feeling that the experimental measurements of the mean bed porosity lose some "connection" with the results predicted by the theoretical stratified model. This can be seen from the comparison of XX and XX. As clearly shown in XXX, the XXXXX fluctuates in a small amplitude when D/d>2.5. But in Fig. 7(a), the authors only provide the predicted smooth values of mean porosity (by the theoretical stratified model) in small range of XXXX, although one may find fluctuating results for other variables of XXX at XXXXX. What about the predicted XXXXXXXX (by the theoretical XXXXX model) at higher XXXXXXX? So I would suggest the authors perform a direct comparison of the measured and predicted XXXXXXXX, to demonstrate if the measurements and predictions could really fluctuate in a similar pace or a pattern showing a correlation. (3) It seems there are data repeatedly presenting for the parameter XXXXX in Fig. 7(b), 8(b) and 9, although they are shown in different range of D/d. (4) Two same symbols of 'D' in Table 2. Which one is for cylinder column diameter and which one for particle diameter? There may be some typos here. Based on the above comments, I can NOT recommend the acceptance of the present paper for publication in this journal. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 这样的意见算不算reject&resubmit?重投需要注意哪些问题呢? |
» 猜你喜欢
如果工作了想读博,可以边工作边读全日制嘛?
已经有6人回复
青B发送上会通知了吗
已经有9人回复
西安交大新媒学院副院长用撤稿论文结题
已经有6人回复
论文撤稿了
已经有8人回复
博士申请
已经有7人回复
化学专业申博
已经有4人回复
评审有感
已经有27人回复
河北省自然科学基金
已经有9人回复
某211大学教师把个人教师官方主页改成:我跑了我跑了我跑了!官宣跑路!
已经有5人回复
26/27申博自荐
已经有9人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
祝大家学业有成,工作顺利,生意兴隆
+1/945
西安电子科技大学保研挑战高速IP设计NVMe,RDMA及NVMe-oF
+1/289
新西兰奥克兰大学计算机CS招PhD及访问学者
+1/85
中科院深圳先进技术研究院集成电路先进封装博士后招聘
+1/83
南京农业大学工学院博士招生 1个名额
+1/74
真诚才是必杀技
+1/74
替投稿20天的论文祈福
+1/71
深圳大学物理与光电工程学院/深圳先进光源研究院招收2026级联合培养博士生
+1/13
英国UCL博士招生
+1/11
环氧彩砂自流平地坪施工及验收规范
+1/9
海南大学生物医学工程学院 (光学诊疗团队)诚邀优秀人才
+1/9
澳大利亚科廷大学(Curtin University)招收全奖博士生
+1/9
能源电催化领域博士后招聘(高薪40万+)
+1/8
郑州大学2026年材料科学与工程学术博士有名额,这几天报名!有意向联系!
+1/7
英国伯明翰大学工程学院招收国际全奖博士生(closing soon请尽快联系)
+1/5
海南大学博士研究生第二批招生 脑空间信息学团队(图像计算方向)
+1/5
中科院福建物构所(福州)国家杰青、青拔团队招特别研究助理(博士后)2-3名
+1/5
深圳理工大学核酸药物递送与干细胞工程课题组科研助理教授和博士后招聘启事
+1/3
首都医科大学药学院2026年申请考核制博士研究生招生/有机化学/药物化学 三年学制
+1/2
肿瘤免疫课题组招聘-科研助理(1年左右推为博士生)
+1/2
★ ★
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
郭梓歌(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-08-10 08:12:10
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
郭梓歌(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-08-10 08:12:10
|
按照reviewer的意见认真修改之后再投就可以了 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
6楼2017-08-09 21:12:45
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
|
大概意思就是论文写得有点乱,人家审稿人觉得调理不清晰吧?感觉审稿人没有否定你的模型和你的工作,你按他说的好好改改再重新投这个期刊呗? 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
24楼2018-10-09 00:15:13
2楼2017-08-09 21:07:49
5楼2017-08-09 21:11:14
7楼2017-08-09 21:14:10
8楼2017-08-09 21:15:38
9楼2017-08-09 21:17:01
12楼2017-08-09 21:20:03
16楼2017-08-09 21:25:50
20楼2017-08-09 22:59:04
21楼2017-08-09 23:06:07
22楼2017-08-09 23:06:23
25楼2018-12-05 15:11:43
简单回复
2017-08-09 21:09
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
看不尽的风景4楼
2017-08-09 21:09
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
南男10楼
2017-08-09 21:17
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
无痕但11楼
2017-08-09 21:19
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
j 发自小木虫Android客户端
nono200913楼
2017-08-09 21:21
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
wyq17614楼
2017-08-09 21:23
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
嗯 发自小木虫Android客户端
wangli520815楼
2017-08-09 21:24
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
yaoyao14517楼
2017-08-09 21:26
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
y 发自小木虫IOS客户端
sz_kebaoyuan18楼
2017-08-09 22:55
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
逝水无痕199019楼
2017-08-09 22:57
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
baggiotalent23楼
2017-08-10 12:57
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与













回复此楼