| 查看: 4110 | 回复: 24 | |||
[交流]
拒稿,重投?
|
|||
|
大修后拒稿,一审,一正一负 系统上显示reject, ![]() ![]() ![]() 但是编辑信里这么写的: Dear Mr. XXX XXX, Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. Therefore I must reject it. For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below. You can improve the work based on the reviewers' reports and submit your improved work as a new submission. The comments made by the reviewers should be better taken of. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. Yours sincerely, XXXXXXX Reviewer #3: The manuscript performs an experimental study on XXXXXXXXXXXX. The authors developed a XXXXXX model and tried to explain the oscillations showed in XXXXXXX. Besides those comments raised by other reviewers, I think, the authors need to clarify the major issues listed below: (1) The biggest problem for this work may be the organization of the paper. Clearly, there are both experimental results and theoretical analysis in the presents. That is, two approaches are used. But just when we look at the titles of the sections for the parts of results and discussion, it is difficult to tell the results from experiments or from the stratified model. The authors are encouraged to rework and reorganized the part of results and discussion to make it clear. (2) There is a feeling that the experimental measurements of the mean bed porosity lose some "connection" with the results predicted by the theoretical stratified model. This can be seen from the comparison of XX and XX. As clearly shown in XXX, the XXXXX fluctuates in a small amplitude when D/d>2.5. But in Fig. 7(a), the authors only provide the predicted smooth values of mean porosity (by the theoretical stratified model) in small range of XXXX, although one may find fluctuating results for other variables of XXX at XXXXX. What about the predicted XXXXXXXX (by the theoretical XXXXX model) at higher XXXXXXX? So I would suggest the authors perform a direct comparison of the measured and predicted XXXXXXXX, to demonstrate if the measurements and predictions could really fluctuate in a similar pace or a pattern showing a correlation. (3) It seems there are data repeatedly presenting for the parameter XXXXX in Fig. 7(b), 8(b) and 9, although they are shown in different range of D/d. (4) Two same symbols of 'D' in Table 2. Which one is for cylinder column diameter and which one for particle diameter? There may be some typos here. Based on the above comments, I can NOT recommend the acceptance of the present paper for publication in this journal. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 这样的意见算不算reject&resubmit?重投需要注意哪些问题呢? |
» 猜你喜欢
基金申报
已经有5人回复
基金委咋了?2026年的指南还没有出来?
已经有7人回复
国自然申请面上模板最新2026版出了吗?
已经有17人回复
纳米粒子粒径的测量
已经有8人回复
疑惑?
已经有5人回复
计算机、0854电子信息(085401-058412)调剂
已经有5人回复
Materials Today Chemistry审稿周期
已经有5人回复
溴的反应液脱色
已经有7人回复
推荐一本书
已经有12人回复
常年博士招收(双一流,工科)
已经有4人回复
» 抢金币啦!回帖就可以得到:
大龄博士征婚
+1/625
南京大学能源与资源学院-景旭东教授 (英国皇家工程院院士) 团队博士后招聘
+1/475
南京大学智能驱动与感知材料实验室诚招硕士/科研助理
+1/275
深圳大学水科学中心HydroS课题组招收化学/环境相关专业博士生1名(2026年入学)
+1/83
信息工程大学教授团队网络空间安全专业博士招生【2026年1月31日报名截止】
+1/83
供应EXAKT德国艾卡特3D打印材料分散用三辊研磨机80E PLUS
+1/80
26博士申请-药物化学方向
+1/78
上海交通大学任垭萌课题组招聘博士后
+1/72
211双一流北京工业大学招计算机、AI、自动控制、电子信息等方向博士生(长期有效)
+1/43
北京林业大学林学院——昆虫病毒/病毒组——博士招生
+1/26
上海科技大学物质科学与技术学院|王平鸾课题组联合招聘博士后
+1/25
英国布里斯托大学诚招博士生和联合培养生 (近期多个博士奖学金)
+1/12
电子科技大学「基础与前沿研究院」文明健老师课题组招收博士
+1/12
北京工业大学高靓教授课题组2026级博士研究生招生
+1/12
浙江大学赵俊杰课题组长期招聘博士后及科研相关岗位启事
+1/9
山东大学(青岛校区)招博士后(COF\MOF\催化\电池)
+1/7
[请教]审稿意见回复
+1/6
武汉双一流高校干细胞与肿瘤生物学团队招聘2026级申请考核制博士生
+1/5
生殖医学与子代健康全国重点实验室华鹏课题组招收博士后及研究生(长期有效)
+1/4
【博士后/科研助理招聘-北京理工大学-集成电路与电子学院-国家杰青团队】
+1/4
★ ★
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
郭梓歌(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-08-10 08:12:10
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
郭梓歌(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-08-10 08:12:10
|
按照reviewer的意见认真修改之后再投就可以了 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
6楼2017-08-09 21:12:45
★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
|
大概意思就是论文写得有点乱,人家审稿人觉得调理不清晰吧?感觉审稿人没有否定你的模型和你的工作,你按他说的好好改改再重新投这个期刊呗? 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
24楼2018-10-09 00:15:13
2楼2017-08-09 21:07:49
5楼2017-08-09 21:11:14
7楼2017-08-09 21:14:10
8楼2017-08-09 21:15:38
9楼2017-08-09 21:17:01
12楼2017-08-09 21:20:03
16楼2017-08-09 21:25:50
20楼2017-08-09 22:59:04
21楼2017-08-09 23:06:07
22楼2017-08-09 23:06:23
25楼2018-12-05 15:11:43
简单回复
2017-08-09 21:09
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
看不尽的风景4楼
2017-08-09 21:09
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
。 发自小木虫Android客户端
南男10楼
2017-08-09 21:17
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
无痕但11楼
2017-08-09 21:19
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
j 发自小木虫Android客户端
nono200913楼
2017-08-09 21:21
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫Android客户端
wyq17614楼
2017-08-09 21:23
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
嗯 发自小木虫Android客户端
wangli520815楼
2017-08-09 21:24
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
yaoyao14517楼
2017-08-09 21:26
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
y 发自小木虫IOS客户端
sz_kebaoyuan18楼
2017-08-09 22:55
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
逝水无痕199019楼
2017-08-09 22:57
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福 发自小木虫IOS客户端
baggiotalent23楼
2017-08-10 12:57
回复
郭梓歌(金币+1): 谢谢参与












回复此楼