| 查看: 2396 | 回复: 13 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者lovehyojoo将赠送您 83 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
lovehyojoo银虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
第一次投sci,审稿意见意图求分析 已有4人参与
|
||
|
Reviewers' comments: Editor:We manage to find just one expert available for reviewing the authors manuscript. In order to speed up the revision process, we decided to take a decision. The authors must follow all the comments of the reviewer and improve the overall quality of the manuscript 请问这句话的意思是不能反驳审稿人的意见吗？ Reviewer #1: The authors propose a new metaheuristic (called Car Tracking Optimization Algorithm) that finds inspiration from the behavior of other algorithms. The subject addressed is coherent with the aims of the journal but the way of presenting the work needs several improvements. It is in general very hard to follow the work. Therefore, I do not recommend the publication of the work in this form in a high level journal like SOFT COMPUTING. 这句话的意思是说我的文章整体结构有问题，需要改结构吗？ In the following, some major/minor comments are given to the authors. Major comments: Originality and significance: The topic of the paper has to be better clarified in the introduction. In this form, it is very hard to follow the concepts, to understand the real contribution etc. Originality and significance have to be highlighted. For example, through a series of bullets, the contributions can be listed and described in the introduction. Presentation: 1) the paper contains several grammatical errors and it is strongly suggested to proofreader it very carefully. 2)It seems to me that the proposed metaheuristic is very similar to the Ant Colony Optimization. Although the authors mention it, they should spend more time to better clarify the differences and the shared aspects. 3) It is not clear the setting of the input parameters. 这个意见我认为我的文章里已经讲清楚了输入参数的设置，但是审稿人说不清楚怎么办？ 4) from the results shown in the tables, it is not highlighted the behavior, on average, of each of the algorithms compared. 这句话的意思是说我的算法跟其他算法比较不是很突出吗？ For example, it seems to me that the proposed algorithm doesn't perform better than the others for what concerns the CPU time required. Is it right? Some Minor comments: Since the performance of these algorithms PRESENTS Car Tracking optimization Algorithm (CTA) Rephrase: We can put an end to the law of these algorithms by studying these optimization algorithms In these swarm intelligence optimization algorithms, particle swarm algorithm For the basic parameters of all algorithms, including population size, the maximum number of function evaluations are same. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
总分293求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
生物技术与工程
已经有3人回复
-
299求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
材料学硕，求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
284求调剂
已经有14人回复
-
292求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
287求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
086003食品工程求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
295求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
考研化学308分求调剂
已经有11人回复
lovehyojoo
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1147.7
- 散金: 50
- 帖子: 102
- 在线: 72.3小时
- 虫号: 3495505
- 注册: 2014-10-24
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 人工智能与知识工程
送红花一朵 |
好的，谢谢你。我的论文主要是提出一种新的算法，并用该算法与现有的一些优秀算法比较，现有的算法的参数我都在文中指出了，而且有引用，但是我自己的算法里的一些参数的设置并没有说明为什么这么设置，审稿人是不是因为这个原因才指出参数设置不清楚，主要我的算法的参数的设置没有理论基础，是我选了不同的参数，测试比较后，才找到一个较好的参数，这种情况我该怎么处理比较好 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
7楼2017-05-13 06:12:46
Chem. Albert
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 365 (硕士)
- 金币: 10672.2
- 散金: 220
- 红花: 71
- 帖子: 1529
- 在线: 301.7小时
- 虫号: 3936158
- 注册: 2015-06-23
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 能源化工
2楼2017-05-12 15:55:43
lovehyojoo
银虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1147.7
- 散金: 50
- 帖子: 102
- 在线: 72.3小时
- 虫号: 3495505
- 注册: 2014-10-24
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 人工智能与知识工程
3楼2017-05-12 16:31:39
Chem. Albert
至尊木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 365 (硕士)
- 金币: 10672.2
- 散金: 220
- 红花: 71
- 帖子: 1529
- 在线: 301.7小时
- 虫号: 3936158
- 注册: 2015-06-23
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 能源化工
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★
lovehyojoo(sesame_oil代发): 金币+2, 感谢交流 2017-05-13 06:25:46
lovehyojoo(sesame_oil代发): 金币+2, 感谢交流 2017-05-13 06:25:46
|
3, 输入参数的设置不详细，这个具体不了解你的这个方向；是设置的原因why、设置的过程How...没有阐明清晰？ 4, 比较结果，看不出突出的优势； |
» 本帖已获得的红花（最新10朵）
4楼2017-05-12 18:43:01
5