24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者lovehyojoo将赠送您 83 个金币

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lovehyojoo

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1147.7
散金: 50
帖子: 102
在线: 72.3小时
虫号: 3495505
注册: 2014-10-24
性别: GG
专业: 人工智能与知识工程

[求助] 第一次投sci,审稿意见意图求分析已有4人参与

Reviewers' comments:

Editor:We manage to find just one expert available for reviewing the authors manuscript. In order to speed up the revision process, we decided to take a decision. The authors must follow all the comments of the reviewer and improve the overall quality of the manuscript
请问这句话的意思是不能反驳审稿人的意见吗？

Reviewer #1: The authors propose a new metaheuristic (called Car Tracking Optimization Algorithm) that finds inspiration from the behavior of other algorithms.
The subject addressed is coherent with the aims of the journal but the way of presenting the work needs several improvements.
It is in general very hard to follow the work. Therefore, I do not recommend the publication of the work in this form in a high level journal like SOFT COMPUTING.
这句话的意思是说我的文章整体结构有问题，需要改结构吗？

In the following, some major/minor comments are given to the authors.

Major comments:

Originality and significance:
The topic of the paper has to be better clarified in the introduction. In this form, it is very hard to follow the concepts, to understand the real contribution etc. Originality and significance have to be highlighted. For example, through a series of bullets, the contributions can be listed and described in the introduction.

Presentation:
1) the paper contains several grammatical errors and it is strongly suggested to proofreader it very carefully.

2)It seems to me that the proposed metaheuristic is very similar to the Ant Colony Optimization. Although the authors mention it, they should spend more time to better clarify the differences and the shared aspects.

3) It is not clear the setting of the input parameters.
这个意见我认为我的文章里已经讲清楚了输入参数的设置，但是审稿人说不清楚怎么办？

4) from the results shown in the tables, it is not highlighted the behavior, on average, of each of the algorithms compared.
这句话的意思是说我的算法跟其他算法比较不是很突出吗？
For example, it seems to me that the proposed algorithm doesn't perform better than the others for what concerns the CPU time required. Is it right?

Some Minor comments:
Since the performance of these algorithms PRESENTS
Car Tracking optimization Algorithm (CTA)

Rephrase:
We can put an end to the law of these algorithms by studying these optimization algorithms

In these swarm intelligence optimization algorithms, particle swarm algorithm

For the basic parameters of all algorithms, including population size, the maximum number of function evaluations are same.

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

表哥与省会女结婚，父母去帮带孩子被省会女气回家生重病了已经有12人回复
依托企业入选了国家启明计划青年人才。有无高校可以引进的。已经有14人回复
江汉大学解明教授课题组招博士研究生/博士后已经有3人回复
AI 太可怕了，写基金时，提出想法，直接生成的文字比自己想得深远，还有科学性已经有11人回复
依托企业入选了国家启明计划青年人才。有无高校可以引进的。已经有11人回复

1楼 2017-05-12 12:56:41

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

lovehyojoo

银虫 (小有名气)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 1147.7
散金: 50
帖子: 102
在线: 72.3小时
虫号: 3495505
注册: 2014-10-24
性别: GG
专业: 人工智能与知识工程

引用回帖:

2楼: Originally posted by Chem. Albert at 2017-05-12 15:55:43
1，属于套话，只有一个审稿意见，请按意见修改；
2，文章整体水平要提高；
3，In the following, some major/minor comments are given to the authors.
每一条都高修改，没有例外；

祝顺利！

请问对于第三点意见和第四点你怎么看，第三点意见我认为文章已经把输入参数说明清楚了，但是审稿人却不认为这样，同时因为文章里的参数很多，审稿意见里的参数没有具体指是哪些参数没有讲清楚，还有第四点我不是很清楚这句话表达的是什么意思，说我的算法跟其他算法比较不是很突出吗？还望虫友帮我分析下