24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2294  |  回复: 13
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者lovehyojoo将赠送您 83 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

lovehyojoo

银虫 (小有名气)

[求助] 第一次投sci,审稿意见意图求分析 已有4人参与

Reviewers' comments:

Editor:We manage to find just one expert available for reviewing the authors manuscript. In order to speed up the revision process, we decided to take a decision. The authors must follow all the comments of the reviewer and improve the overall quality of the manuscript
请问这句话的意思是不能反驳审稿人的意见吗?


Reviewer #1: The authors propose a new metaheuristic (called Car Tracking Optimization Algorithm) that finds inspiration from the behavior of other algorithms.
The subject addressed  is coherent with the aims of the journal but the way of presenting the work needs several improvements.  
It is in general very hard to follow the work. Therefore, I do not recommend the publication of the work in this form in a high level journal like SOFT COMPUTING.
这句话的意思是说我的文章整体结构有问题,需要改结构吗?

In the following, some major/minor comments are given to the authors.

Major comments:

Originality and significance:
The topic of the paper has to be better clarified in the introduction. In this form, it is very hard to follow the concepts, to understand the real contribution etc. Originality and significance have to be highlighted. For example, through a series of bullets, the contributions can be listed and described in the introduction.


Presentation:
1) the paper contains several grammatical errors and it is strongly suggested to proofreader it very carefully.

2)It seems to me that the proposed metaheuristic is very similar to the Ant Colony Optimization. Although the authors mention it, they should spend more time to better clarify the differences and the shared aspects.

3) It is not clear the setting of the input parameters.
这个意见我认为我的文章里已经讲清楚了输入参数的设置,但是审稿人说不清楚怎么办?

4) from the results shown in the tables, it is not highlighted the behavior, on average,  of each of the algorithms compared.
这句话的意思是说我的算法跟其他算法比较不是很突出吗?
For example, it seems to me that the proposed algorithm doesn't perform better than the others for what concerns the CPU time required. Is it right?


Some Minor comments:
Since the performance of these algorithms PRESENTS
Car Tracking optimization Algorithm (CTA)

Rephrase:
We can put an end to the law of these algorithms by studying these optimization algorithms

In these swarm intelligence optimization algorithms, particle swarm algorithm

For the basic parameters of all algorithms, including population size, the maximum number of function evaluations are same.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lovehyojoo

银虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
12楼: Originally posted by 温柔的忙哥 at 2017-05-16 11:01:07
按照这个审稿人的意见去改,我感觉工作量不小呢。但是也说明你的这个稿件存在很多问题。
根据我的审稿经验,个人建议如下:
1. 你的文章写作逻辑和重点不清楚,导致审稿人很难清晰的理解你的研究内容。  
    修 ...

希望虫友对我的回复能指出不足的地方,还有再次感谢虫友的指导
14楼2017-05-16 17:26:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 14 个回答

Chem. Albert

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
lovehyojoo(sesame_oil代发): 金币+10, 感谢交流 2017-05-13 06:25:36
1,属于套话,只有一个审稿意见,请按意见修改;
2,文章整体水平要提高;
3,In the following, some major/minor comments are given to the authors.
每一条都高修改,没有例外;

祝顺利!
2楼2017-05-12 15:55:43
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lovehyojoo

银虫 (小有名气)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by Chem. Albert at 2017-05-12 15:55:43
1,属于套话,只有一个审稿意见,请按意见修改;
2,文章整体水平要提高;
3,In the following, some major/minor comments are given to the authors.
每一条都高修改,没有例外;

祝顺利!

请问对于第三点意见和第四点你怎么看,第三点意见我认为文章已经把输入参数说明清楚了,但是审稿人却不认为这样,同时因为文章里的参数很多,审稿意见里的参数没有具体指是哪些参数没有讲清楚,还有第四点我不是很清楚这句话表达的是什么意思,说我的算法跟其他算法比较不是很突出吗?还望虫友帮我分析下
3楼2017-05-12 16:31:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Chem. Albert

至尊木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
lovehyojoo(sesame_oil代发): 金币+2, 感谢交流 2017-05-13 06:25:46
3, 输入参数的设置不详细,这个具体不了解你的这个方向;是设置的原因why、设置的过程How...没有阐明清晰?
4, 比较结果,看不出突出的优势;

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

4楼2017-05-12 18:43:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见