| 查看: 2248 | 回复: 0 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
英文会议投稿，provisionally accepted，什么意思，审稿人的意见感觉不到什么意思
|
|||
|
Medical Image Understanding and Analysis 2017 准备水的会议，现在返回了意见，看这两个审稿人意见有点不懂，1审稿人好像说没什么意义，是这意思吗？2审稿人也是没提什么具体东西。 Dear xxx, We are pleased to inform you that your paper xxxx has been accepted for the conference 'Medical Image Understanding and Analysis - MIUA 2017'. Please follow the link below to view the paper's detail page: Enclosed please find the reports. Final Report: ARGUMENTATION: On behalf of the MIUA 2017 Program Committee members, we are pleased to inform you that your paper (title above) has been provisionally accepted for publication in the conference proceedings, which will be published by Springer as a volume in the "Communications in Computer and Information Sciences" (CCIS) series. Congratulations! Please note that the final decision will be subject to: 1) Registration of the (co)author that will present the paper 2) An appropriate editing of the camera-ready version of the paper in accordance to the suggestions made by the Reviewers, which can be found at the bottom of this email or when logging into the OCS (https://ocs.springer.com/ocs/home/MIUA2017). You will be notified by email of your final presentation type (oral or poster) after the due date of the camera ready papers. This will depend on the score given during the review process, and the programme of the conference. Reports: --------------- ARGUMENTATION: It's difficult to read the paper because of the english and many mistakes, such as the use of wildly instead of widely. Although I'm not an expert in this subject, some parts of the paper are repeated, and I have the impression that the only contribution of this paper is the design of the pattern of the marker, as the process of detecting lines is trivial in this case. --------------- --------------- ARGUMENTATION: This paper present a system based on fiducial marker as a new tool to replace existing surgical tracking device by reducing the cost. I am providing few minor comments to improve the manuscript: 1. This idea looks original to me and the preliminary results look promising. However, I believe that more advance experiments are required to verify the accuracy of this system in real surgical conditions. The authors need to acknowledge this point in their conclusions. 2. Another process that could be used is the SLAM (Simultaneous localization and mapping) to avoid the use of targets. It would be good if the authors can consider this new approach for future applications 3. This manuscript is full of typos e.g. "thedistance", "system.Navigation" 4. System - "next chapter" should be "next section" --------------- |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
硕博巨婴，也许才刚刚开始
已经有65人回复
-
投稿被一个审稿人恶意评审了怎么样？
已经有7人回复
-
面青地会评时间
已经有5人回复
-
关于2023的收入
已经有34人回复
-
累并快乐着
已经有13人回复
-
每次骚扰女学生的都是院系领导，而不是普通教师，小编们要注意措辞正确
已经有9人回复
-
博后面上今天有bug可以看到是否资助？
已经有31人回复
-
关于博后基金的bug问题
已经有9人回复
-
上海交大招收材料化学方向科研助理/“申请考核”博士（请勿回复帖子或站内投条）
已经有4人回复
-
Nature 11日发文，中国著名学者们称造假迫不得已
已经有5人回复
5