24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 1837  |  回复: 10
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者jty_hust将赠送您 4 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

jty_hust

新虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 审稿意见返回 已有4人参与

审稿人,一个小修,一个说没有创新,给拒稿,编辑给大修,还有希望吗?

@Monash2011 发自小木虫Android客户端
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jty_hust

新虫 (著名写手)

over the same speed range the more pulses you take from the machine the higher the efficiency. This is a common sense conclusion and not worthy of publication. Clearly if you do not discharge the machine at all but let it coast from one speed to the other it will have zero efficiency as all the energy goes into losses. 2) The paper is written very poorly with too many spelling and grammatical errors, too numerous to point out. 3)Author uses coordinate systems in expressions without once explaining the placement of the coordinates relative to the machine. 4)There is no new material or information of value that can be gleaned from this paper. Additional Questions: 1. Subject matter appropriate to scope of TPS?: No 2. Sufficient new technical/physics advances (original work)?: No 3. Proper context with related work / adequate references? *: Yes 4. Appropriate quality of presentation? **: No 5. Suitable title?: Yes 6. Adequate abstract?: Yes 7. Should manuscript be shortened?: No 8. Clear figures with captions?: No 9. English satisfactory? ***: No Overall rating of paper: Reject

发自小木虫Android客户端
8楼2017-03-09 20:55:53
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 11 个回答

yanhualover

荣誉版主 (职业作家)

我是花木虫

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jty_hust(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-03-10 08:25:16
编辑的意见最重要。大修的话,好好修改,希望很大。
人生苦短,秉烛夜游
2楼2017-03-09 20:35:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jokage

新虫 (著名写手)

跟我一样的结果,我已经修回去了

发自小木虫Android客户端
3楼2017-03-09 20:38:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jty_hust

新虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by yanhualover at 2017-03-09 20:35:33
编辑的意见最重要。大修的话,好好修改,希望很大。

编辑让好好回复拒稿人的意见,这个是会议转期刊的专刊

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2017-03-09 20:39:05
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见