24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

sybgyq

木虫 (著名写手)

应助: 12 (小学生)
金币: 1838.3
散金: 6941
红花: 12
帖子: 2389
在线: 693.6小时
虫号: 2661254
注册: 2013-09-17
专业: 通信理论与系统

[求助] ScienceDirect 出版社文章接受后是什么处理流程已有2人参与

近日收到aerospace science and technology 文章接受的通知。系统里面显示accept. 但编辑的邮件主题是your submission 后面还有一个审稿人意见关于语言方面的。我还需要修改嘛然后以邮件的方式回复他因为系统里面没有递交这项。我该怎么处理想请教一下。下面是编辑的邮件这个期刊版面费多少。多久检索。我还需要做些什么。这个出版社第一次投希望大神指点
I am pleased to inform you that your paper has been accepted for publication in Aerospace Science and Technology.

Below are comments from the editor and reviewers.

Thank you for submitting your work to Aerospace Science and Technology.

When your paper is published on ScienceDirect, you want to make sure it gets the attention it deserves. To help you get your message across, Elsevier has developed a new, free service called AudioSlides: brief, webcast-style presentations that are shown (publicly available) next to your published article. This format gives you the opportunity to explain your research in your own words and attract interest. You will receive an invitation email to create an AudioSlides presentation shortly. For more information and examples, please visit https://www.elsevier.com/audioslides.

Yours sincerely,

Associate Editor
Aerospace Science and Technology

Comments from the editors and reviewers:

Reviewer #1: New signal design is a very important issue, so the subject addressed in this article is interested. This paper introduced a modulation family, and gave many analysis and simulation results to show its better navigation performance. Of course, in my opinion, whether it is effective in actual application should be tested in more practical platform but not only the simulation.

I think the author responded very seriously to all the comments. By means of that, the contributions were clearer. The language was improved significantly. In my opinion, it can be accepted.

Reviewer #4: Despite the English revision, I still find that there are some mistakes with usage. Some examples I found are:
1) In the abstract, the sentence starting "Theoretical analysis..." should have an "and" between "accuracy" and "multipath" instead of a comma
2) The first sentence of the introduction is an awkward start to a paper
3) After equation (1), should be "takes values of" not "takes value"

Overall, I find the paper a bit difficult to read due to the many acronyms used repeatedly.

Reviewer #5: No comments on this version of the manuscript.

发自小木虫IOS客户端

回复此楼