| 查看: 2353 | 回复: 14 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
sybgyq木虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
ScienceDirect 出版社文章接受后是什么处理流程 已有2人参与
|
||
|
近日收到aerospace science and technology 文章接受的通知。系统里面显示accept. 但编辑的邮件主题是your submission 后面还有一个审稿人意见关于语言方面的。 我还需要修改嘛然后以邮件的方式回复他 因为系统里面没有递交这项。我该怎么处理 想请教一下。下面是编辑的邮件 这个期刊版面费多少。多久检索。我还需要做些什么。这个出版社第一次投 希望大神指点 I am pleased to inform you that your paper has been accepted for publication in Aerospace Science and Technology. Below are comments from the editor and reviewers. Thank you for submitting your work to Aerospace Science and Technology. When your paper is published on ScienceDirect, you want to make sure it gets the attention it deserves. To help you get your message across, Elsevier has developed a new, free service called AudioSlides: brief, webcast-style presentations that are shown (publicly available) next to your published article. This format gives you the opportunity to explain your research in your own words and attract interest. You will receive an invitation email to create an AudioSlides presentation shortly. For more information and examples, please visit https://www.elsevier.com/audioslides. Yours sincerely, Associate Editor Aerospace Science and Technology Comments from the editors and reviewers: Reviewer #1: New signal design is a very important issue, so the subject addressed in this article is interested. This paper introduced a modulation family, and gave many analysis and simulation results to show its better navigation performance. Of course, in my opinion, whether it is effective in actual application should be tested in more practical platform but not only the simulation. I think the author responded very seriously to all the comments. By means of that, the contributions were clearer. The language was improved significantly. In my opinion, it can be accepted. Reviewer #4: Despite the English revision, I still find that there are some mistakes with usage. Some examples I found are: 1) In the abstract, the sentence starting "Theoretical analysis..." should have an "and" between "accuracy" and "multipath" instead of a comma 2) The first sentence of the introduction is an awkward start to a paper 3) After equation (1), should be "takes values of" not "takes value" Overall, I find the paper a bit difficult to read due to the many acronyms used repeatedly. Reviewer #5: No comments on this version of the manuscript. 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
长年满屏的广告，版主太不责任了。基金也等的急
已经有3人回复
-
filecode
已经有12人回复
-
不应该看fileCode
已经有4人回复
-
应该是93bebmhtak前后十一个字符比较关键
已经有33人回复
-
FileCode能看出啥？
已经有19人回复
-
2019年青年基金涵评意见，大家看看几个A，几个B?
已经有5人回复
-
职称评审，求友友推荐见刊最快的期刊
已经有4人回复
-
奇怪，两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样
已经有10人回复
-
综述论文作为代表作会不会影响评审专家的印象分？
已经有13人回复
-
是这周出结果还是下周出结果？
已经有3人回复
sybgyq
木虫 (著名写手)
- 应助: 12 (小学生)
- 金币: 1839.9
- 散金: 6941
- 红花: 12
- 帖子: 2391
- 在线: 694.1小时
- 虫号: 2661254
- 注册: 2013-09-17
- 专业: 通信理论与系统
3楼2017-03-02 12:21:32
kmght
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
AP
- 应助: 615 (博士)
- 金币: 8609.7
- 散金: 1233
- 红花: 82
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 5973
- 在线: 854.9小时
- 虫号: 4245445
- 注册: 2015-11-25
- 专业: 生物海洋学与海洋生物资源
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
yanhualover: 金币+1, 谢谢交流 2017-03-02 12:26:33
sybgyq: 金币+20, ★★★★★最佳答案 2017-03-04 21:23:03
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
yanhualover: 金币+1, 谢谢交流 2017-03-02 12:26:33
sybgyq: 金币+20, ★★★★★最佳答案 2017-03-04 21:23:03
|
系统里没有提交选择的话可以直接把修改稿发到编辑邮箱 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
2楼2017-03-02 12:17:50
kmght
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
AP
- 应助: 615 (博士)
- 金币: 8609.7
- 散金: 1233
- 红花: 82
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 5973
- 在线: 854.9小时
- 虫号: 4245445
- 注册: 2015-11-25
- 专业: 生物海洋学与海洋生物资源
4楼2017-03-02 12:23:37
nono2009
超级版主 (文学泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
-
专家经验: +21105 - SEPI: 10
- 应助: 28684 (院士)
- 贵宾: 513.911
- 金币: 2555230
- 散金: 27828
- 红花: 2148
- 沙发: 66666
- 帖子: 1602255
- 在线: 65200.9小时
- 虫号: 827383
- 注册: 2009-08-13
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 工程热物理与能源利用
- 管辖: 科研家筹备委员会
5楼2017-03-02 13:19:32
