24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2091  |  回复: 14

sybgyq

木虫 (著名写手)

[求助] ScienceDirect 出版社文章接受后是什么处理流程 已有2人参与

近日收到aerospace science and technology 文章接受的通知。系统里面显示accept. 但编辑的邮件主题是your submission 后面还有一个审稿人意见关于语言方面的。 我还需要修改嘛然后以邮件的方式回复他 因为系统里面没有递交这项。我该怎么处理 想请教一下。下面是编辑的邮件   这个期刊版面费多少。多久检索。我还需要做些什么。这个出版社第一次投 希望大神指点
I am pleased to inform you that your paper has been accepted for publication in Aerospace Science and Technology.

Below are comments from the editor and reviewers.

Thank you for submitting your work to Aerospace Science and Technology.

When your paper is published on ScienceDirect, you want to make sure it gets the attention it deserves. To help you get your message across, Elsevier has developed a new, free service called AudioSlides: brief, webcast-style presentations that are shown (publicly available) next to your published article. This format gives you the opportunity to explain your research in your own words and attract interest. You will receive an invitation email to create an AudioSlides presentation shortly. For more information and examples, please visit https://www.elsevier.com/audioslides.

Yours sincerely,


Associate Editor
Aerospace Science and Technology

Comments from the editors and reviewers:


Reviewer #1: New signal design is a very important issue, so the subject addressed in this article is interested. This paper introduced a modulation family, and gave many analysis and simulation results to show its better navigation performance. Of course, in my opinion, whether it is effective in actual application should be tested in more practical platform but not only the simulation.

I think the author responded very seriously to all the comments. By means of that, the contributions were clearer. The language was improved significantly. In my opinion, it can be accepted.



Reviewer #4: Despite the English revision, I still find that there are some mistakes with usage. Some examples I found are:
1) In the abstract, the sentence starting "Theoretical analysis..." should have an "and" between "accuracy" and "multipath" instead of a comma
2) The first sentence of the introduction is an awkward start to a paper
3) After equation (1), should be "takes values of" not "takes value"

Overall, I find the paper a bit difficult to read due to the many acronyms used repeatedly.



Reviewer #5: No comments on this version of the manuscript.

发自小木虫IOS客户端
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
回帖支持 ( 显示支持度最高的前 50 名 )

nono2009

超级版主 (文学泰斗)

No gains, no pains.

优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀区长优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
不需要再修改了。后面就是进入出版流程了,等待后续的邮件通知
5楼2017-03-02 13:19:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

wuweinan55

铁虫 (初入文坛)

请问楼主这个期刊二审大概多长时间
9楼2018-04-11 14:58:14
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sybgyq

木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
9楼: Originally posted by wuweinan55 at 2018-04-11 14:58:14
请问楼主这个期刊二审大概多长时间

我的估计1年左右吧

发自小木虫IOS客户端
10楼2018-04-11 18:18:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通回帖

kmght

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

AP

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
yanhualover: 金币+1, 谢谢交流 2017-03-02 12:26:33
sybgyq: 金币+20, ★★★★★最佳答案 2017-03-04 21:23:03
系统里没有提交选择的话可以直接把修改稿发到编辑邮箱

发自小木虫IOS客户端
Practice-makes-perfect
2楼2017-03-02 12:17:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

sybgyq

木虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by kmght at 2017-03-02 12:17:50
系统里没有提交选择的话可以直接把修改稿发到编辑邮箱

可是他的邮箱感觉是系统邮箱啊。我试试吧。谢谢你的帮助

发自小木虫IOS客户端
3楼2017-03-02 12:21:32
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kmght

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

AP

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by sybgyq at 2017-03-02 12:21:32
可是他的邮箱感觉是系统邮箱啊。我试试吧。谢谢你的帮助
...

不然proof时候也可以改吧?

发自小木虫IOS客户端
Practice-makes-perfect
4楼2017-03-02 12:23:37
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

vincent_hpax

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

博学 慎思 明辨 笃行
6楼2017-03-02 15:45:02
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

Tiredness

新虫 (初入文坛)


7楼2017-03-02 15:52:27
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
8楼2017-03-02 16:03:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 sybgyq 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见