| 查看: 927 | 回复: 3 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者慕童小丸子将赠送您 100 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
润色 已有1人参与
|
|||
|
Because, for the hydrogenation of light fraction oil, 3～8 nm of aperture was profitable, while for heavy oil hydrogenation, 7～13 nm was the best pore diameter range. The aperture of catalyst which was too small might hinder the diffusion of reactants and products, and that too large was not good for the dispersion of active phases. 哪位前辈能帮我润色一下这段话，想投稿，但老师说这句话太口语化。谢谢 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
调剂求收留
已经有6人回复
-
272分材料子求调剂
已经有36人回复
-
275求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
一志愿211，化学学硕，310分，本科重点双非，求调剂
已经有20人回复
-
070300化学学硕311分求调剂
已经有19人回复
-
材料与化工调剂
已经有13人回复
-
材料与化工调剂
已经有33人回复
-
复试调剂
已经有7人回复
-
一志愿哈工大 085600 277 12材科基求调剂
已经有17人回复
-
还有化工二轮调剂的学校吗
已经有47人回复
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
| Noted that too small aperture of catalyst might hinder the diffusion of reactants/products and (that) too large leveled the difficulty of well dispersion of active phases, 3～8 nm of aperture was appropriate for hydrogenation of light fraction oil, while 7～13 nm favored heavy oil. |
4楼2017-02-10 09:53:09
2楼2017-02-09 20:01:13
dingq0703371
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 6779.6
- 散金: 732
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 675
- 在线: 172小时
- 虫号: 905845
- 注册: 2009-11-18
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电机与电器
3楼2017-02-09 22:38:46
