| 查看: 924 | 回复: 3 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者慕童小丸子将赠送您 100 个金币 | ||
[求助]
润色 已有1人参与
|
||
|
Because, for the hydrogenation of light fraction oil, 3～8 nm of aperture was profitable, while for heavy oil hydrogenation, 7～13 nm was the best pore diameter range. The aperture of catalyst which was too small might hinder the diffusion of reactants and products, and that too large was not good for the dispersion of active phases. 哪位前辈能帮我润色一下这段话，想投稿，但老师说这句话太口语化。谢谢 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
材料专业344求调剂
已经有19人回复
-
085404 298分求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
296求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
初试261
已经有6人回复
-
284求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
材料085601调剂
已经有25人回复
-
272分材料子求调剂
已经有23人回复
-
22408调剂求助
已经有7人回复
-
调剂
已经有17人回复
-
材料类284调剂
已经有43人回复
2楼2017-02-09 20:01:13
dingq0703371
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 6779.6
- 散金: 732
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 675
- 在线: 172小时
- 虫号: 905845
- 注册: 2009-11-18
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电机与电器
3楼2017-02-09 22:38:46
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
| Noted that too small aperture of catalyst might hinder the diffusion of reactants/products and (that) too large leveled the difficulty of well dispersion of active phases, 3～8 nm of aperture was appropriate for hydrogenation of light fraction oil, while 7～13 nm favored heavy oil. |
4楼2017-02-10 09:53:09
10