| 查看: 926 | 回复: 3 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者慕童小丸子将赠送您 100 个金币 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
[求助]
润色 已有1人参与
|
||
|
Because, for the hydrogenation of light fraction oil, 3～8 nm of aperture was profitable, while for heavy oil hydrogenation, 7～13 nm was the best pore diameter range. The aperture of catalyst which was too small might hinder the diffusion of reactants and products, and that too large was not good for the dispersion of active phases. 哪位前辈能帮我润色一下这段话，想投稿，但老师说这句话太口语化。谢谢 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
一志愿西北工业大学289 085602
已经有27人回复
-
281求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
284求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
0858求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
287求调剂
已经有21人回复
-
求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
人工智能320调剂08工类还有机会吗
已经有8人回复
-
290求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
272分材料子求调剂
已经有25人回复
-
332求调剂
已经有12人回复
dingq0703371
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 6779.6
- 散金: 732
- 红花: 2
- 帖子: 675
- 在线: 172小时
- 虫号: 905845
- 注册: 2009-11-18
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 电机与电器
3楼2017-02-09 22:38:46
2楼2017-02-09 20:01:13
【答案】应助回帖
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
| Noted that too small aperture of catalyst might hinder the diffusion of reactants/products and (that) too large leveled the difficulty of well dispersion of active phases, 3～8 nm of aperture was appropriate for hydrogenation of light fraction oil, while 7～13 nm favored heavy oil. |
4楼2017-02-10 09:53:09
