24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2366  |  回复: 14
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者SCANDOL将赠送您 2 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

SCANDOL

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 第一次投稿Rock mechanics and rock engineering, 悲催的被据稿了, 已有2人参与

第一次投稿Rock mechanics and rock engineering, 悲催的被据稿了,大家帮忙看看编辑的意见,如果改投technical note会有多大的机会?
With regret, I must inform you that, based on the advice received, your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.
The paper is in general well written and well presented. However, the two reviewers are of the opinion that it is too superficial scientifically and not sufficiently robust to be presented as a full paper.
Basically re the original work, no repetition of tests to demonstrate repeatability. Conclusions are speculative and specific to the tests with no general application or interest.
With the above in mind, I invite you to submit the test data (with added comments on limitations/repeatability etc.) as a technical note. Please see our guidelines on the web for this type of submission.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

聆紫

新虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
8楼: Originally posted by SCANDOL at 2017-01-13 12:59:21
是可行的

祝顺利

发自小木虫Android客户端
10楼2017-01-13 13:01:56
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 15 个回答
2楼2017-01-12 23:22:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kmght

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

AP

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
liouzhan654: 金币+2, 感谢交流 2017-01-13 10:09:16
SCANDOL: 金币+3, ★★★很有帮助 2017-01-13 11:38:32
有希望,但是主编提到的分析深度,重复性等问题一定要改进

发自小木虫IOS客户端
Practice-makes-perfect
3楼2017-01-12 23:58:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

SCANDOL

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
3楼: Originally posted by kmght at 2017-01-12 23:58:54
有希望,但是主编提到的分析深度,重复性等问题一定要改进

这两个问题确实存在。请问您投过RMRE么?我再他们主页上找不到具体的technical note 的要求。
4楼2017-01-13 11:50:59
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见