| 查看: 2463 | 回复: 14 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者SCANDOL将赠送您 2 个金币 | ||
[求助]
第一次投稿Rock mechanics and rock engineering, 悲催的被据稿了， 已有2人参与
|
||
|
第一次投稿Rock mechanics and rock engineering, 悲催的被据稿了，大家帮忙看看编辑的意见，如果改投technical note会有多大的机会？ With regret, I must inform you that, based on the advice received, your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. The paper is in general well written and well presented. However, the two reviewers are of the opinion that it is too superficial scientifically and not sufficiently robust to be presented as a full paper. Basically re the original work, no repetition of tests to demonstrate repeatability. Conclusions are speculative and specific to the tests with no general application or interest. With the above in mind, I invite you to submit the test data (with added comments on limitations/repeatability etc.) as a technical note. Please see our guidelines on the web for this type of submission. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
为什么中国大学工科教授们水了那么多所谓的顶会顶刊，但还是做不出宇树机器人？
已经有9人回复
-
版面费该交吗
已经有9人回复
-
体制内长辈说体制内绝大部分一辈子在底层，如同你们一样大部分普通教师忙且收入低
已经有13人回复
-
面上可以超过30页吧？
已经有4人回复
-
“人文社科而论，许多学术研究还没有达到民国时期的水平”
已经有5人回复
-
什么是人一生最重要的？
已经有4人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
2楼2017-01-12 23:22:04
kmght
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
AP
- 应助: 615 (博士)
- 金币: 8609.7
- 散金: 1233
- 红花: 82
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 5973
- 在线: 854.9小时
- 虫号: 4245445
- 注册: 2015-11-25
- 专业: 生物海洋学与海洋生物资源
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
liouzhan654: 金币+2, 感谢交流 2017-01-13 10:09:16
SCANDOL: 金币+3, ★★★很有帮助 2017-01-13 11:38:32
感谢参与，应助指数 +1
liouzhan654: 金币+2, 感谢交流 2017-01-13 10:09:16
SCANDOL: 金币+3, ★★★很有帮助 2017-01-13 11:38:32
|
有希望，但是主编提到的分析深度，重复性等问题一定要改进 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |
3楼2017-01-12 23:58:54
4楼2017-01-13 11:50:59
kmght
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
AP
- 应助: 615 (博士)
- 金币: 8609.7
- 散金: 1233
- 红花: 82
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 5973
- 在线: 854.9小时
- 虫号: 4245445
- 注册: 2015-11-25
- 专业: 生物海洋学与海洋生物资源
5楼2017-01-13 12:53:28
6楼2017-01-13 12:55:39
7楼2017-01-13 12:58:08
8楼2017-01-13 12:59:21
9楼2017-01-13 13:01:47
10楼2017-01-13 13:01:56