| 查看: 2392 | 回复: 14 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者SCANDOL将赠送您 2 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
第一次投稿Rock mechanics and rock engineering, 悲催的被据稿了, 已有2人参与
|
|||
|
第一次投稿Rock mechanics and rock engineering, 悲催的被据稿了,大家帮忙看看编辑的意见,如果改投technical note会有多大的机会? With regret, I must inform you that, based on the advice received, your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. The paper is in general well written and well presented. However, the two reviewers are of the opinion that it is too superficial scientifically and not sufficiently robust to be presented as a full paper. Basically re the original work, no repetition of tests to demonstrate repeatability. Conclusions are speculative and specific to the tests with no general application or interest. With the above in mind, I invite you to submit the test data (with added comments on limitations/repeatability etc.) as a technical note. Please see our guidelines on the web for this type of submission. |
» 猜你喜欢
自荐读博
已经有8人回复
投稿Elsevier的杂志(返修),总是在选择OA和subscription界面被踢皮球
已经有8人回复
自然科学基金委宣布启动申请书“瘦身提质”行动
已经有4人回复
求个博导看看
已经有18人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:
kmght
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
AP
- 应助: 615 (博士)
- 金币: 8609.7
- 散金: 1233
- 红花: 82
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 5973
- 在线: 854.9小时
- 虫号: 4245445
- 注册: 2015-11-25
- 专业: 生物海洋学与海洋生物资源
【答案】应助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
liouzhan654: 金币+2, 感谢交流 2017-01-13 10:09:16
SCANDOL: 金币+3, ★★★很有帮助 2017-01-13 11:38:32
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
liouzhan654: 金币+2, 感谢交流 2017-01-13 10:09:16
SCANDOL: 金币+3, ★★★很有帮助 2017-01-13 11:38:32
|
有希望,但是主编提到的分析深度,重复性等问题一定要改进 发自小木虫IOS客户端 |

3楼2017-01-12 23:58:54
2楼2017-01-12 23:22:04
4楼2017-01-13 11:50:59
kmght
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
AP
- 应助: 615 (博士)
- 金币: 8609.7
- 散金: 1233
- 红花: 82
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 5973
- 在线: 854.9小时
- 虫号: 4245445
- 注册: 2015-11-25
- 专业: 生物海洋学与海洋生物资源

5楼2017-01-13 12:53:28







回复此楼