| 查看: 2206 | 回复: 6 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
小丑鱼爱读书新虫 (正式写手)
|
[求助]
两个审稿人，一个同意发表，一个拒稿，有没有必要argue一下呢？ 已有4人参与
|
|
|
这是具体审稿意见，感觉都没提出什么具体问题，第二位审稿人主要就是质疑创新性，大家给看看有没有必要argue呢？如果有必要该怎么写呢？第一次遇到这种情况，希望有经验的可以多多指导！谢谢！ In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has been denied publication in the *****. Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author In this paper, the authors gave some experimental proofs and explained the reasons on the compatibilizing agent A has better interfacial adhesion properties than B between PP and MOSw. The authors investigated the effects of compatibilizing agent on the interfacial adhesion properties of the PP/MOSw composites by SEM, TGA, ATR-FTIR and rheological tests in detailed. Besides these techniques, DSC results maybe provide some useful information on this topic. The paper is well-written and can be accepted for publication in ****. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author The authors studied effects of A and B on interfacial adhesion properties of the PP/MOSw composites. Although the manuscript does not contain significant technical flaws, it lacks the sense of innovation in terms of material preparation, characterization, and discussion. The topic dealing with interfacial interaction of PP composites has been substantially investigated, and the conclusions are known to the community. Mechanism analysis is routine and does not add to existing understanding of similar systems. In this context, the manuscript is more suitable for journals focusing on polymer engineering. |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI一区文章，我:8O5.5.1.O5.4,科目全,可伽急
已经有4人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有4人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O55.1.O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有7人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有19人回复
-
售SCI一区T0P文章，我:8.O.55.1.O.5.4,科目全,可+急
已经有8人回复
-
售一区SCI文章T0P，我:8O.551.O54,科目全,可十急
已经有8人回复
-
售SCI文章，我:8O.5.5.1O.54,科目全,可十急
已经有7人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有8人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- SCI投稿过程总结、投稿状态解析、拒稿后对策及接受后期相关问答
已经有142人回复
- SCI投稿过程总结
已经有124人回复
2011myfamily
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 98 (初中生)
- 金币: 902.8
- 散金: 335
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 447
- 在线: 81.2小时
- 虫号: 4777735
- 注册: 2016-06-16
- 性别: MM
- 专业: 金属基复合材料
5楼2017-01-02 21:11:48
hongyanyao
银虫 (初入文坛)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 800.6
- 红花: 1
- 帖子: 43
- 在线: 93.5小时
- 虫号: 637238
- 注册: 2008-10-26
- 专业: 应用高分子化学与物理
2楼2017-01-02 12:58:44
kmght
铁杆木虫 (知名作家)
AP
- 应助: 615 (博士)
- 金币: 8609.7
- 散金: 1233
- 红花: 82
- 沙发: 1
- 帖子: 5973
- 在线: 854.9小时
- 虫号: 4245445
- 注册: 2015-11-25
- 专业: 生物海洋学与海洋生物资源
3楼2017-01-02 13:17:04
★
liouzhan654: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-01-02 18:24:06
liouzhan654: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-01-02 18:24:06
|
建议argue一下，还是有希望的，北航那篇nature也是argue争取才发表的，可能也就耽误一到两周而已 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
4楼2017-01-02 13:28:55
