24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2035  |  回复: 6

小丑鱼爱读书

新虫 (正式写手)

[求助] 两个审稿人,一个同意发表,一个拒稿,有没有必要argue一下呢? 已有4人参与

这是具体审稿意见,感觉都没提出什么具体问题,第二位审稿人主要就是质疑创新性,大家给看看有没有必要argue呢?如果有必要该怎么写呢?第一次遇到这种情况,希望有经验的可以多多指导!谢谢!
In view of the criticisms of the reviewer(s) found at the bottom of this letter, your manuscript has been denied publication in the *****.

Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author:

Reviewer: 1

Comments to the Author

In this paper, the authors gave some experimental proofs and explained the reasons on the compatibilizing agent A has better interfacial adhesion properties than B between PP and MOSw. The authors investigated the effects of compatibilizing agent on the interfacial adhesion properties of the PP/MOSw composites by SEM, TGA, ATR-FTIR and rheological tests in detailed. Besides these techniques, DSC results maybe provide some useful information on this topic. The paper is well-written and can be accepted for publication in ****.

Reviewer: 2

Comments to the Author
The authors studied effects of A and B on interfacial adhesion properties of the PP/MOSw composites. Although the manuscript does not contain significant technical flaws, it lacks the sense of innovation in terms of material preparation, characterization, and discussion. The topic dealing with interfacial interaction of PP composites has been substantially investigated, and the conclusions are known to the community. Mechanism analysis is routine and does not add to existing understanding of similar systems. In this context, the manuscript is more suitable for journals focusing on polymer engineering.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐,对您同样有帮助:

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

hongyanyao

银虫 (初入文坛)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
liouzhan654: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-01-02 18:23:47
小丑鱼爱读书: 金币+1, 有帮助 2017-01-03 11:22:32
改投别的杂志更好一些 argue也不一定有用 也许还浪费时间

[ 发自手机版 https://muchong.com/3g ]
2楼2017-01-02 12:58:44
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

kmght

铁杆木虫 (知名作家)

AP

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
有拒稿意见的没必要argue,成功率极低

发自小木虫IOS客户端
Practice-makes-perfect
3楼2017-01-02 13:17:04
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

darvincy

木虫 (正式写手)


liouzhan654: 金币+1, 感谢交流 2017-01-02 18:24:06
建议argue一下,还是有希望的,北航那篇nature也是argue争取才发表的,可能也就耽误一到两周而已

发自小木虫Android客户端
哈哈
4楼2017-01-02 13:28:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

2011myfamily

金虫 (正式写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2017-01-02 23:39:55
小丑鱼爱读书: 金币+1, 有帮助 2017-01-03 11:22:48
我觉得再解释不如按照审稿意见修改一点找个别的期刊投!已经没希望了,别浪费时间!
I love my family!
5楼2017-01-02 21:11:48
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

harryhg

金虫 (小有名气)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
paperhunter: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2017-01-02 23:40:01
小丑鱼爱读书: 金币+1, 有帮助 2017-01-03 11:22:55
小丑鱼爱读书: 金币+2, 有帮助 2017-01-03 11:23:21
argue的话你的point是什么呢?创新性这东西有时候仁者见仁,没法定量衡量。除非你有什么有力的证据说明你的创新性
6楼2017-01-02 21:30:33
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

meranl

铁虫 (正式写手)

改投吧,审稿人2也说了,建议换个更合适的期刊

发自小木虫IOS客户端
加油努力好毕业的好骚年!
7楼2017-01-03 00:23:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 小丑鱼爱读书 的主题更新
信息提示
请填处理意见