24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2101  |  回复: 15
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者迷茫的科研人将赠送您 20 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

迷茫的科研人

银虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 帮我看看下面审稿人的意见咋样,有希望吗? 已有2人参与

如题,本人两个月前投了一个四区的SCI文章,今天收到审稿意见了,貌似是要大修,具体意见如下:  (请大神帮忙解读一下,问我这个要具体怎么修改哦,最终被录用的机会大不大)
Comments
From references made in the paper introduction I see that the authors do not know the state-of-the-art in the field: Almost references used (e.g., [1-7]) have been criticized in recent reviews [A1, A2]. The main point of this criticism is that the approaches that researches [1-15] have used are not consistent with the empirical nucleation nature of traffic breakdown at road bottlenecks. It seems that the authors do not know the empirical nucleation nature of traffic breakdown at road bottlenecks at all. Therefore, the results of this paper are not scientifically sound: It is not shown that the authors’ approach is consistent with the empirical nucleation nature of traffic breakdown at road bottlenecks.

Thus I recommend rejecting this version of the paper.

Nevertheless, I recommend to give the authors a possibility to show whether their approach is consistent with the empirical nucleation nature of traffic breakdown at road bottlenecks.
To reach this goal, I recommend the authors read the reviews [A1, A2], the books [A3, A4] and the article [5] in which the empirical nucleation nature of traffic breakdown at road bottlenecks has been explained in details and has been used for speed limit control. The authors should refer to [A1-A5] in the revised paper that should be reviewed once more.
The authors should try to show whether their approach is consistent with the empirical nucleation nature of traffic breakdown at road bottlenecks.


Additional literature:
[A1] B.S. Kerner, Physica A {\bf 392} 5261--5282 (2013)
[A2] B.S. Kerner, Physica A {\bf 450} 700--747 (2016)
[A3] B.S. Kerner, {\it The Physics of Traffic}, (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 2004)
[A4] B.S. Kerner, {\it Introduction to Modern Traffic Flow Theory and Control}, (Springer, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York 2009)
[A5] B.S. Kerner. “Study of freeway speed limit control based on three-phase traffic theory”. Transportation Research Record, 1999, 30-39 (2007).

帮我看看下面审稿人的意见咋样,有希望吗?
意见.png
回复此楼
行百里者鲜
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangdyhit

捐助贵宾 (小有名气)


感觉他对你写的不太认可 有时候表述需要比较专业恰当 可以提供帮助

发自小木虫IOS客户端
3楼2016-12-19 21:56:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 16 个回答

風VS雲

木虫 (著名写手)

心静自然明
2楼2016-12-19 21:38:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
不懂楼主的专业,貌似审稿人认为楼主对研究领域的最新进展缺乏了解,引用的文献存在理论缺陷,导致论文的科学性存在疑问,要求楼主引用五篇文献(有可能是审稿人本人的)进行解释和讨论。
咱也是有组织的人了...
4楼2016-12-19 23:17:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

zhangysbad

铁虫 (著名写手)

基本没戏,应该非常了解你的领域!改投吧!

发自小木虫Android客户端
5楼2016-12-19 23:24:08
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见