| ²é¿´: 480 | »Ø¸´: 3 | ||
¶ÌðÌðгæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[ÇóÖú]
ÎÒÏëÖªµÀÕâÉó¸åÈËÏë¸ÉÂï
|
Results: I suggest starting this section with a paragraph entitled "Choice of Materials" (before "Characterization" where the authors explain why they have decided to use these materials. Why are materials other than GC, cysteine, AuNP (such as ITO, thioglycolic acid as used in [41], CNT or graphene) not as good? The authors also should provide a better explanation of the function(s) of the components/materials. As it stands, the paper is often purely descriptive but does not give enough information (and an explanation) why this choice of materials has resulted in the best(?) solution. @Gamry-µç»¯Ñ§ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
µ÷¼ÁÐÅÏ¢
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
»ªÄÏÀí¹¤0703»¯Ñ§£¬×Ü·Ö336Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
·ÖÎö»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ203È˻ظ´
ºÓ±±Å©´óÉúÎïÓëҽҩרҵÕÐÊÕµ÷¼Á£¬Ãû¶î³ä×ã
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Æë³¹¤Òµ´óѧ ¹ú¼ÒÖØµãʵÑéÊÒ-ÐÂÄÜÔ´¡¢ï®Àë×Óµç³Ø¡¢²ÄÁÏ¡¢»¯Ñ§·½Ïò
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
һ־Ըǰ4λ´úÂë0703¾ù¿É±¨Ãû-ºÓ±±´óѧ·ÖÎö»¯Ñ§×¨ÒµÕÐÊÕµ÷¼Á¿¼Éú
ÒѾÓÐ57È˻ظ´
¡ï¡ï±¬¡ï¡ï0860ÉúÎïÓëÒ½Ò©µ÷¼Á¿¼Éú¿´¹ýÀ´£¬ºÓ±±´óѧ»¯Ñ§Óë²ÄÁÏ¿ÆÑ§Ñ§Ôº
ÒѾÓÐ85È˻ظ´
½ÜÇà/³¤½ÍŶÓÕÐÊÕµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÖÐÄÏÁÖÒµ¿Æ¼¼´óѧÂÞÓ·æ½ÌÊÚÍŶÓ2026ÄêÕÐÊÕ²ÄÁÏÀàµ÷¼ÁÑо¿Éú
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
µç×ӿƼ¼´óѧ²ÄÁÏѧԺÍõÁˆ½ÌÊÚÄâÕÐÊÕ¹¤³Ì²©Ê¿Ò»Ãû£¨»¯Ñ§¡¢²ÄÁÏ·½Ïò£©
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
ºþÄÏũҵ´óѧÄÜÔ´²ÄÁÏ´´ÐÂÍŶÓÕÐÊÕ2026»¯Ñ§×¨ÒµÑо¿Éú£¨Ñ§Ë¶£©µ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
» ±¾Ö÷ÌâÏà¹Ø¼ÛÖµÌùÍÆ¼ö£¬¶ÔÄúͬÑùÓаïÖú:
Èç¹ûÕâ²ÅÊÇÅóÓÑ ÄѵÀÎÒÒÔǰÄÇô´ýÅóÓÑÊÇ´íÎóµÄô
ÒѾÓÐ24È˻ظ´
ÎÒÒª±»¶ªÀòËÒ¶ÁË£¬ÂúÂúµÄ¸ºÄÜÁ¿
ÒѾÓÐ25È˻ظ´
Éó¸åÒâ¼û¿´²»¶®£¬ÇóÖú
ÒѾÓÐ4È˻ظ´
ÆÚ¿¯´Ó¸ßÍùµÍͶ²¢²»Ã÷ÖÇ
ÒѾÓÐ149È˻ظ´
ÕâÓ¦¸ÃËãÊÇÆæÓö°É¡ª¡ªÉó¸åÈ˱ä³ÉÁ˲¢ÁÐcorresponding author¡£¡£¡£
ÒѾÓÐ42È˻ظ´
ÔÓÖ¾Ó°ÏìÒò×ÓÓëÎҺθɣ¿ÎÄÕÂˮƽÆÀ¼ÛÁíÀà̽ÌÖ
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
ÎÄÕ½ÓÊÕ£¨IF£¾4£©£¬·ÖÏí¾Ñ顤¡¤¡¤¡¤
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
¶ÌðÌð
гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 613.5
- Ìû×Ó: 13
- ÔÚÏß: 9.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3435853
- ×¢²á: 2014-09-20
- ÐÔ±ð: MM
| ΪʲôÓÃÕâ²ÄÁÏÒÔ¼°²ÄÁϵÄÓÅÊÆÎÒIntroductionдµÃÃ÷Ã÷°×°×µÄ£¬È»ºó²ÄÁϵĺÃ×îÖÕÌåÏÖÔÚʵÑéÊý¾ÝÉϺͲÄÁϱíÕ÷ÉÏ£¬ÎÒ²»ÃèÊöÊý¾ÝÎÒÃèÊöʲô°¡¡£ËûÏëÈÃÎÒдÕâÒ»¶Î¸ÉÂï½âÊÍʲô @Gamry-µç»¯Ñ§ |
2Â¥2016-12-12 18:46:45
101¡ãC
½ð³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1424.1
- É¢½ð: 14
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 251
- ÔÚÏß: 49.6Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3481156
- ×¢²á: 2014-10-17
- ÐÔ±ð: GG
- רҵ: Ò±½ðÎïÀí»¯Ñ§ÓëÒ±½ðÔÀí
|
˵°×Á˾ÍÊÇÏëÈÃÄã½âÊÍÒ»µã»úÀíÉϵĶ«Î÷£¬»¹ÓоÍÊÇÄãµÄ²ÄÁÏÓÐʲôÓÅÊÆ ·¢×ÔСľ³æAndroid¿Í»§¶Ë |
3Â¥2016-12-12 23:22:01
Gamry-µç»¯Ñ§
½ð³æ (Ö°Òµ×÷¼Ò)
- ECEPI: 3
- Ó¦Öú: 651 (²©Ê¿)
- ½ð±Ò: 1210.1
- É¢½ð: 1293
- ºì»¨: 1275
- Ìû×Ó: 3702
- ÔÚÏß: 506.2Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 3437295
- ×¢²á: 2014-09-24
- רҵ: µç»¯Ñ§
4Â¥2016-12-14 09:18:01














where the authors explain why they have decided to use these materials. Why are materials other than GC, cysteine, AuNP (such as ITO, thioglycolic acid as used in [41], CNT or graphene) not as good? The authors also should provide a better explanation of the function(s) of the components/materials. As it stands, the paper is often purely descriptive but does not give enough information (and an explanation) why this choice of materials has resulted in the best(?) solution. @
»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥