24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 8314  |  回复: 26
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者jiangxl将赠送您 17 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

jiangxl

金虫 (著名写手)

[求助] 郁闷,一审后接受发表,二审居然拒稿,请问该如何处理?已有10人参与

投Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics(IF=1.65),一审用了2个多月,结果是小修后,Based on the advice received, the Editors have decided that your manuscript can be accepted for publication after you have carried out the corrections as suggested by the reviewer(s).
二审用了1个月,With regret, I must inform you that, based on the advice received, the Editors have decided that your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
气死了。请问有遇到过这样的事情吗?没有给出什么合适的理由。两次审稿人意见都是很简单的,请问该如何处理?

一审的审稿人意见:Reviewer #1: Dear Author,
thank you for submitting the manuscript: `。。。。` to the journal `Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics`. It was very interesting. Unfortunately, there are a few aspects I need to comment:
- many shortcuts make the manuscript confusing
- what is the clinical consequence?
- the tables and figures are not in a good quality and they are confusing
- please don`t write the name of a medication (Gonal-F) in the paper!
Thank you very much for your paper, if you revise the paper and go over the  mentioned points again the paper could be reviewed again.


二审的审稿人意见:thank you for resubmitting your revised manuscript.
After extensive reevaluation and discussion with experienced colleagues in the field we cannot recommend the manuscript for pubilcation as the very high standards of the journal are not met.
回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lqmchina

新虫 (初入文坛)

11楼2016-08-29 01:58:50
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 27 个回答

lianwei666

新虫 (正式写手)

二审意见很明显拒稿,有可能你没有按一审意见修改

发自小木虫Android客户端
有梦想就有奇迹
2楼2016-08-28 21:11:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

lianwei666

新虫 (正式写手)


jiangxl(liouzhan654代发): 金币+1, 感谢交流 2016-08-28 22:48:02
也就是你的修改没有达到审稿人要求,至于编辑的回复,有可能是官方回复,他觉得一审问题不大,审稿人也没有拒稿,个人意见,仅供参考,按意见可以好好再修改

发自小木虫Android客户端
有梦想就有奇迹
3楼2016-08-28 21:13:13
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jiangxl

金虫 (著名写手)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by lianwei666 at 2016-08-28 21:11:06
二审意见很明显拒稿,有可能你没有按一审意见修改

一审意见没有提出很多问题,很认真的修改了,都是些小问题的。如下
- many shortcuts make the manuscript confusing
- what is the clinical consequence?
- the tables and figures are not in a good quality and they are confusing
- please don`t write the name of a medication (Gonal-F) in the paper!
4楼2016-08-28 21:14:24
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见