ͶArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics£¨IF=1.65£©£¬Ò»ÉóÓÃÁË2¸ö¶àÔ£¬½á¹ûÊÇСÐÞºó£¬Based on the advice received, the Editors have decided that your manuscript can be accepted for publication after you have carried out the corrections as suggested by the reviewer(s).
¶þÉóÓÃÁË1¸öÔ£¬With regret, I must inform you that, based on the advice received, the Editors have decided that your manuscript cannot be accepted for publication in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
ÆøËÀÁË¡£ÇëÎÊÓÐÓöµ½¹ýÕâÑùµÄÊÂÇéÂð£¿Ã»Óиø³öʲôºÏÊʵÄÀíÓÉ¡£Á½´ÎÉó¸åÈËÒâ¼û¶¼ÊǺܼòµ¥µÄ£¬ÇëÎʸÃÈçºÎ´¦Àí?
Ò»ÉóµÄÉó¸åÈËÒâ¼û£ºReviewer #1: Dear Author,
thank you for submitting the manuscript: `¡£¡£¡£¡£` to the journal `Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics`. It was very interesting. Unfortunately, there are a few aspects I need to comment:
- many shortcuts make the manuscript confusing
- what is the clinical consequence?
- the tables and figures are not in a good quality and they are confusing
- please don`t write the name of a medication (Gonal-F) in the paper!
Thank you very much for your paper, if you revise the paper and go over the mentioned points again the paper could be reviewed again.
¶þÉóµÄÉó¸åÈËÒâ¼û£ºthank you for resubmitting your revised manuscript.
After extensive reevaluation and discussion with experienced colleagues in the field we cannot recommend the manuscript for pubilcation as the very high standards of the journal are not met. |