| 查看: 3753 | 回复: 41 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
审稿意见回来，ASCE期刊，大家帮忙看看是否可申请重投机会，谢谢了
|
|||
|
投稿ASCE，审稿意见大致如下，最后编辑给了拒稿，求助是否可申请重投机会，谢谢啦 Reviewer #1: This manuscript describes research on****. I need to say that the manuscript is really hard to read. Thus, I had quite often a hard time to capture the meaning of many phrases. Just because of inappropriate language I cannot recommend the manuscript for publication. ***十多条意见，包括修改语句，解释现象和结论，并让加一些东西。 Reviewer #2: This manuscript presents a relatively new structural solution applicable to ****. A ** approach was assumed to investigate the ****. In general, the idea behind this work is sound and the paper provides a preliminary insight on a practically interesting problem. In some cases the submission lacks in terms of presented data/information and the exposition of the research is weakened by that. As such, the authors are encouraged to address the following points, which will hopefully increase the quality of the manuscript even further (not in the order of importance):***十多条意见，让引用几篇文献，解释数值模型和更正语句错误 Reviewer #3: The technical content of this paper may be great, but the grammar needs improvement. It is hard to understand and is very awkward. There are passages that I read several times and was unable to determine the meaning. I think it should be reviewed by an editor if the authors are not able to correct the grammar. 没有审稿意见 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
售SCI文章，我:8O5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有5人回复
-
售SCI-T0P文章，我:8O.5.5.1.O.54,科目齐全,可+急
已经有3人回复
-
为什么资助数各大高校都创新高，自己申请怎么就这么难
已经有15人回复
-
科研人应该花精力去思考如何解决问题，而不是去凝练问题
已经有14人回复
-
要骂人了，新模版改版就是要淡化问题凝练这种虚的东西，结果有个评委还在说凝练得不够
已经有17人回复
-
基金系统什么内容也没有
已经有10人回复
-
学科评审组评审是指会评吗？
已经有5人回复
-
面上合作单位盖章
已经有9人回复
-
面上函评意见出来了，像什么等级？
已经有17人回复
-
小白求助 投论文要求的highlights应该如何写
已经有4人回复
36楼2016-08-24 20:18:45
10楼2016-08-24 15:04:45
简单回复
2016-08-24 14:46
回复
qiang_1992(金币+1): 谢谢参与
G 发自小木虫Android客户端
v.cc6楼
2016-08-24 14:49
回复
qiang_1992(金币+1): 谢谢参与
2016-08-24 15:02
回复
qiang_1992(金币+1): 谢谢参与
祝福祝福祝福祝福祝福祝福祝福祝福祝福祝福祝福祝福祝福祝福祝福祝福祝福祝福
愤怒的老鸟12楼
2016-08-24 15:08
回复
30