| ²é¿´: 777 | »Ø¸´: 4 | ||||
ºÙºÙÒâÍâŶľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
[½»Á÷]
Éó¸åÒâ¼û»Ø¸´
|
|
С˶һö£¡Í¶ÁËÆªsci£¬Á½¸öÉó¸åÈ˷dz£¸ºÔð£¬ÌáÁË20ÌõÒâ¼û£¡ËÄܸæËßÎÒÕâ¸öÉó¸åÒâ¼ûÔõô»Ø¸´£¨ÎÊÌâ¶¼Òѽâ¾ö£©£¬ËÓÐÔø¾»Ø¸´¹ýÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÄÜ·ñÈÃÎÒ¿´¿´°¡£¡¸Ðл£¡£¡£¡£¡ ·¢×ÔСľ³æAndroid¿Í»§¶Ë |
» ÊÕ¼±¾ÌûµÄÌÔÌûר¼ÍƼö
ÆÚ¿¯ÂÛÎÄ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
ÇóÖúÓÐʯÓÍ»¯¹¤Öм¶¹¤³ÌʦÂð
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
Ѱ»·¾³¹¤³ÌÖм¶Ò»Ãû£¬×ÉѯÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Óлú¸ß·Ö×Ó²ÄÁÏÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ272È˻ظ´
ÎÒÕÒÏÂʯÓÍ»¯¹¤Öм¶¹¤³Ìʦ×ÉѯÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ5È˻ظ´
ÕÒ¿ÉÒÔΨһµÄ»¯¹¤¹¤³Ì£¬×ÉѯÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ2È˻ظ´
Óл¯¹¤¹¤³ÌÖй¤Âð£¬×ÉѯÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÇóÖú£¬ÇëÎÊÓÐûÓл·¾³¡¢»·±£Öм¶¹¤³Ìʦѽ£¬×ÉѯÎÊÌâ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÓÐûÓÐ×ö·Çú¿óɽÏà¹Ø¹¤×÷£¬¿¼°²¹ÜÖ¤µÄѽ
ÒѾÓÐ1È˻ظ´
Óй¤³ÌʦÂð£¬ÕÒ»·¾³¹¤³Ìʦ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
paperhunter
ÈÙÓþ°æÖ÷ (ÎÄѧ̩¶·)
»¹Ã»ÏëºÃ
-

ר¼Ò¾Ñé: +14 - Ó¦Öú: 14603 (½ÌÊÚ)
- ¹ó±ö: 11.659
- ½ð±Ò: 345467
- É¢½ð: 9262
- ºì»¨: 1423
- ɳ·¢: 2016
- Ìû×Ó: 127554
- ÔÚÏß: 8880.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 971012
- ×¢²á: 2010-03-14
- רҵ: »·¾³¹¤³Ì
- ¹ÜϽ: ÂÛÎÄͶ¸å
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
ºÙºÙÒâÍâŶ: ½ð±Ò+5, Ê®·Ö¸Ðл£¡¸øÎһظ´Òâ¼ûÓÐÒ»¸öºÜºÃµÄÖ¸Òý 2016-06-12 12:06:24
Сľ³æ: ½ð±Ò+0.5, ¸ø¸öºì°ü£¬Ð»Ð»»ØÌû
ºÙºÙÒâÍâŶ: ½ð±Ò+5, Ê®·Ö¸Ðл£¡¸øÎһظ´Òâ¼ûÓÐÒ»¸öºÜºÃµÄÖ¸Òý 2016-06-12 12:06:24
|
Dear Editor and Reviewers, Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers¡¯ comments concerning our manuscript entitled ¡°Paper Title¡± (ID: ÎÄÕ¸åºÅ). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer¡¯s comments are as flowing: Responds to the reviewer¡¯s comments: Reviewer #1: 1. Response to comment: (¡¡¼òÒªÁгöÒâ¼û¡¡) Response: ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á 2. Response to comment: (¡¡¼òÒªÁгöÒâ¼û¡¡) Response: ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á ...... ÖðÌõÒâ¼û»Ø´ð£¬ÇмÉÒ»¶¨²»ÄÜÓÐÒÅ© Õë¶Ô²»Í¬µÄÎÊÌâÓÐÏÂÁм¸¸öÀñòÊõÓï¿ÉÊʵ±ÓÃÓ㺠We are very sorry for our negligence of ¡¡... We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ¡¡... It is really true as Reviewer suggested that¡¡ We have made correction according to the Reviewer¡¯s comments. We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer¡¯s suggestion As Reviewer suggested that¡¡ Considering the Reviewer¡¯s suggestion, we have ¡¡ ×îºóÌØÒâ¸ÐлһÏÂÕâ¸öÉó¸åÈ˵ÄÒâ¼û£º Special thanks to you for your good comments. Reviewer #2: ͬÉÏÊö Reviewer #3: ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á Other changes: 1. Line 60-61, the statements of ¡°¡¡¡± were corrected as ¡°¡¡¡¡¡± 2. Line 107, ¡°¡¡¡± was added 3. Line 129, ¡°¡¡¡± was deleted ¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á¡Á We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper. We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers¡¯ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval. Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions. http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=10272829 |

2Â¥2016-06-12 10:55:28
ºÙºÙÒâÍâŶ
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
|
¶¥Ò»Ï ·¢×ÔСľ³æAndroid¿Í»§¶Ë |
3Â¥2016-06-12 13:50:18
xyhzc12345
гæ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 6263.1
- É¢½ð: 490
- ºì»¨: 3
- Ìû×Ó: 2136
- ÔÚÏß: 114.4Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2609429
- ×¢²á: 2013-08-21
- רҵ: ½ºÌåÓë½çÃæ»¯Ñ§
4Â¥2016-06-20 03:51:06
ºÙºÙÒâÍâŶ
ľ³æ (СÓÐÃûÆø)
- Ó¦Öú: 1 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 1974.2
- É¢½ð: 15
- ºì»¨: 2
- Ìû×Ó: 235
- ÔÚÏß: 134.7Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 2319379
- ×¢²á: 2013-03-05
- רҵ: °ëµ¼Ìå²ÄÁÏ
5Â¥2016-06-20 07:58:05













»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥