24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

嘿嘿意外哦

木虫 (小有名气)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 1534.2
散金: 15
红花: 2
帖子: 235
在线: 136.1小时
虫号: 2319379
注册: 2013-03-05
专业: 半导体材料

[交流] 审稿意见回复

小硕一枚！投了篇sci，两个审稿人非常负责，提了20条意见！谁能告诉我这个审稿意见怎么回复（问题都已解决），谁有曾经回复过审稿人的能否让我看看啊！感谢！！！！

发自小木虫Android客户端

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

期刊论文

» 猜你喜欢

广东医科大学2026年招聘简章已经有2人回复
招调剂研究生已经有0人回复
冶金与矿业论文润色/翻译怎么收费? 已经有219人回复
调剂招生已经有0人回复
浙江农林大学082900林业工程学科招收调剂学术型硕士已经有0人回复
济南大学-先进建筑材料教育部工程研究中心-大牛团队-26届博士生申请已经有23人回复
北方民族大学材料科学与工程学院第二次调剂剩下最后三小时了已经有0人回复
211高校哈工程-2026申请考核制-材料或化工方向博士补招-临时空余 1 名额已经有0人回复
博士入学自荐，26博士已经有7人回复
求水泥工艺学(第3版) 作者:林宗寿出版社:武汉理工大学出版社出版时间:2023年03月已经有0人回复

1楼 2016-06-12 10:51:41

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

专家经验: +14
应助: 14603 (教授)
贵宾: 11.659
金币: 345467
散金: 9262
红花: 1423
沙发: 2016
帖子: 127554
在线: 8880.4小时
虫号: 971012
注册: 2010-03-14
专业: 环境工程
管辖: 论文投稿

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
嘿嘿意外哦: 金币+5, 十分感谢！给我回复意见有一个很好的指引 2016-06-12 12:06:24

Dear Editor and Reviewers,
Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:
Responds to the reviewer’s comments:
Reviewer #1:
1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)
Response: ××××××
2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)
Response: ××××××
......
逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏
针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：
We are very sorry for our negligence of ……...
We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...
It is really true as Reviewer suggested that……
We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments.
We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestion
As Reviewer suggested that……
Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……
最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：
Special thanks to you for your good comments.
Reviewer #2:
同上述
Reviewer #3:
××××××
Other changes:
1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………”
2. Line 107, “……” was added
3. Line 129, “……” was deleted
××××××
We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.
We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.
Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=10272829