24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

嘿嘿意外哦

木虫 (小有名气)

应助: 1 (幼儿园)
金币: 1974.2
散金: 15
红花: 2
帖子: 235
在线: 134.7小时
虫号: 2319379
注册: 2013-03-05
专业: 半导体材料

[交流] 审稿意见回复

小硕一枚！投了篇sci，两个审稿人非常负责，提了20条意见！谁能告诉我这个审稿意见怎么回复（问题都已解决），谁有曾经回复过审稿人的能否让我看看啊！感谢！！！！

发自小木虫Android客户端

回复此楼

» 收录本帖的淘帖专辑推荐

期刊论文

» 猜你喜欢

求Mg5Gd和Mg7Gd的PDF卡片已经有0人回复
求助二硫化钼 JCPDS card no: 01-073-1508 已经有0人回复
冶金与矿业论文润色/翻译怎么收费? 已经有186人回复
水性聚氨酯乳液含气泡求助已经有3人回复
求助TEM衍射斑点标定已经有3人回复
溶胶凝胶法制备玻璃包覆铜粉粒径问题已经有10人回复
结晶态硅酸钠中硅含量测定已经有2人回复
硅肥中硅含量测定已经有1人回复
溶胶凝胶制备玻璃粉工艺已经有0人回复
为橡胶、塑料以及高分子等材料提供免费实验（支持寄料打样）已经有0人回复

1楼 2016-06-12 10:51:41

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

专家经验: +14
应助: 14603 (教授)
贵宾: 11.659
金币: 345462
散金: 9262
红花: 1423
沙发: 2016
帖子: 127553
在线: 8880.4小时
虫号: 971012
注册: 2010-03-14
专业: 环境工程
管辖: 论文投稿

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包，谢谢回帖
嘿嘿意外哦: 金币+5, 十分感谢！给我回复意见有一个很好的指引 2016-06-12 12:06:24

Dear Editor and Reviewers,
Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers’ comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as flowing:
Responds to the reviewer’s comments:
Reviewer #1:
1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)
Response: ××××××
2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)
Response: ××××××
......
逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏
针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：
We are very sorry for our negligence of ……...
We are very sorry for our incorrect writing ……...
It is really true as Reviewer suggested that……
We have made correction according to the Reviewer’s comments.
We have re-written this part according to the Reviewer’s suggestion
As Reviewer suggested that……
Considering the Reviewer’s suggestion, we have ……
最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：
Special thanks to you for your good comments.
Reviewer #2:
同上述
Reviewer #3:
××××××
Other changes:
1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” were corrected as “…………”
2. Line 107, “……” was added
3. Line 129, “……” was deleted
××××××
We tried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in the manuscript. These changes will not influence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list the changes but marked in red in revised paper.
We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers’ warm work earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.
Once again, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions.

http://muchong.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=10272829