| 查看: 360 | 回复: 1 | ||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者starared将赠送您 9 个金币 | ||
starared禁虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
请帮忙看一下审稿意见 已有1人参与
|
|
|
I have reviewed your manuscript and have some question I would like you to address before I consider sending it for external review. In your description of the experiment, you list a number of factors that were assessed: pH, removal time, temperature, and salinity. Presumably these were evaluated separately in relation to removal but this in unclear. For example, you present an ANOVA table (did you really run an ANOVA of this size?) but also ran a CCD which is designed, in part, to reduce the number of levels tested for multiple factors in a multi-factor ANOVA. This is confusing. The problem is confounded by the lack of information in the table/figure captions. In the ANOVA table (Table 3) I presume that terms like AB and AC are interaction terms and that the superscripted numbers refer to interactions between the same factor (the superscripted numbers might lead some readers to search for the corresponding note at the bottom of the table. I suggest changing this to "AxB" or "CxC" if this is the intent. Also, if the experiments were replicated, why are there no error bars associated with the bars in Figure 1? 特别是其中的 Presumably these were evaluated separately in relation to removal but this in unclear. For example, you present an ANOVA table (did you really run an ANOVA of this size?) but also ran a CCD which is designed, in part, to reduce the number of levels tested for multiple factors in a multi-factor ANOVA. This is confusing.The problem is confounded by the lack of information in the table/figure captions. 不太明白真实意图 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
求老师收留
已经有4人回复
-
一志愿郑州大学材料与化工085600，求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
专硕085601求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
重庆大学材料与化工085600，初试370+，求求调剂建议
已经有7人回复
-
286求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
260求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
326求调剂
已经有4人回复
-
调剂
已经有4人回复
-
285求调剂
已经有6人回复
-
材料与化工306分找调剂
已经有3人回复
2楼2016-06-03 09:28:23
