| 查看: 359 | 回复: 1 | |||
| 【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者starared将赠送您 9 个金币 | |||
starared禁虫 (著名写手)
|
[求助]
请帮忙看一下审稿意见 已有1人参与
|
||
|
I have reviewed your manuscript and have some question I would like you to address before I consider sending it for external review. In your description of the experiment, you list a number of factors that were assessed: pH, removal time, temperature, and salinity. Presumably these were evaluated separately in relation to removal but this in unclear. For example, you present an ANOVA table (did you really run an ANOVA of this size?) but also ran a CCD which is designed, in part, to reduce the number of levels tested for multiple factors in a multi-factor ANOVA. This is confusing. The problem is confounded by the lack of information in the table/figure captions. In the ANOVA table (Table 3) I presume that terms like AB and AC are interaction terms and that the superscripted numbers refer to interactions between the same factor (the superscripted numbers might lead some readers to search for the corresponding note at the bottom of the table. I suggest changing this to "AxB" or "CxC" if this is the intent. Also, if the experiments were replicated, why are there no error bars associated with the bars in Figure 1? 特别是其中的 Presumably these were evaluated separately in relation to removal but this in unclear. For example, you present an ANOVA table (did you really run an ANOVA of this size?) but also ran a CCD which is designed, in part, to reduce the number of levels tested for multiple factors in a multi-factor ANOVA. This is confusing.The problem is confounded by the lack of information in the table/figure captions. 不太明白真实意图 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
265求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
085600材料与化工调剂
已经有20人回复
-
专硕 351 086100 也是考的材科基 本科也是材料
已经有6人回复
-
085600专硕材料与化工348分求调剂
已经有10人回复
-
085600 295分求调剂
已经有21人回复
-
285求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
一志愿安徽大学0817化学工程与技术，求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
一志愿0817化学工程与技术，求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
271分求调剂学校
已经有3人回复
-
生物学308分求调剂（一志愿华东师大）
已经有7人回复
2楼2016-06-03 09:28:23
