| 查看: 511 | 回复: 2 | |||
[求助]
如何回复审稿人 已有1人参与
|
| Authors should highlight what are the most original parts of the work in light of the previously published, an justify the need to employ materials and methodologies already used before. 大体意思是我的文章中的大部分材料在我们课题组以前的文章中展示过了，还列了几篇课题组以前的工作。在线等 |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
0703调剂
已经有4人回复
-
1
已经有21人回复
-
物理化学论文润色/翻译怎么收费?
已经有191人回复
-
0703 调剂
已经有6人回复
-
招收
已经有0人回复
-
西南某211招27届博士
已经有32人回复
-
大连工业杰青/长江团队-生物质材料-储能电池方向招收2026级博士生
已经有0人回复
-
求调剂一志愿海大，0703化学学硕304分，有大创项目，四级已过
已经有10人回复
-
070300 求调剂
已经有1人回复
-
深圳大学高等研究院赵伟课题组招收化学调剂生
已经有2人回复
» 本主题相关商家推荐: (我也要在这里推广)
|
1.审稿人 的意见 Authors give an weak explanation to the publication of a new article very similar to those previously published. However, at least, they give a reference of their prior paper. Furthermore, the paragraph: "Compared with our previous work [26], the proposed immunosensor fabricated with less material and simple process, which can reduce the interference ..." must be rewritten. 让重新写的一句话Compared with our previous work [26], the proposed immunosensor fabricated with less material and simple process, which can reduce the interference factors during the experiment process and improve the stability and accuracy of the immunosensor. 不太清楚审稿人是说语法错误还是要改这一段话的意思 |
2楼2016-06-01 09:10:16
olea
专家顾问 (著名写手)
-
专家经验: +513 - 应助: 369 (硕士)
- 贵宾: 0.371
- 金币: 17697.7
- 红花: 89
- 帖子: 2364
- 在线: 1890.1小时
- 虫号: 210547
- 注册: 2006-03-07
- 专业: 电化学
- 管辖: 电化学
。3楼2016-06-01 09:26:42
