| ²é¿´: 474 | »Ø¸´: 1 | ||
| ±¾Ìû²úÉú 1 ¸ö ·ÒëEPI £¬µã»÷ÕâÀï½øÐв鿴 | ||
haojue1016гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
|
[ÇóÖú]
Çë°ïÖú·Ò뼸¾ä»°¡£Ð»Ð»
|
|
|
1. ΪʲôҪ½«A»¹Ô³ÉB?A±ÈBµÄÓÅÊÆÔÚÄÄÀA½øÈëÍ¿²ãºóÒ²»áÐγÉB. 2. Fig.3 ÖмýÍ·ÎÄÖÐ˵ÊÇָʾAµÄ´æÔÚ£¬ÕâÖÖ˵·¨ÒÀ¾ÝÔÚÄÄÀÕýÈ·Âð£¿ÎÒÎÞ·¨È·ÈϼýÍ·µÄº¬Òå¡£Áí£¬SEMͼƬµÄ±¶ÊýΪʲôûÓбê³ö£¿ 3. Õâ¸ö½ØÃæºÜ²»Çå³þ£¬ËµÃ÷²»ÁËÎÊÌ⣬ºÜÓбØÒªÖØÐÂ×ö¡£ 4. Fig.8 ºá×ø±êÓÐÎÊÌâ¡£ 5. ƽ¾ùĦ²ÁϵÊýÊÇÈçºÎµÃ³öµÄ£¿Çë˵Ã÷¾ßÌå·½·¨¡£ 6. ÎÄÖÐȱÉÙÖÆ±¸µÄAºÍCµÄXRD±íÕ÷¡£ 7. ¹¤ÒÕ²ÎÊýÖÐÓ¦º¬Óз´Ó¦Ê±¼ä¡£ |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
22408 µ÷¼Á²ÄÁÏ
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
285Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ12È˻ظ´
Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
085600²ÄÁÏÓ뻯¹¤301·ÖÇóµ÷¼ÁԺУ
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
277¹¤¿ÆÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ11È˻ظ´
277Çóµ÷¼Á ÊýÒ»104·Ö
ÒѾÓÐ13È˻ظ´
304Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ10È˻ظ´
336Çóµ÷¼Á£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸Öпƴó
ÒѾÓÐ6È˻ظ´
071000ÉúÎïѧ£¬Ò»Ö¾Ô¸ÉîÛÚ´óѧ296·Ö£¬Çóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ3È˻ظ´
Ò»Ö¾Ô¸±±¾©»¯¹¤085600 310·ÖÇóµ÷¼Á
ÒѾÓÐ19È˻ظ´
jamesmnbvcxz
гæ (³õÈëÎÄ̳)
- ·ÒëEPI: 4
- Ó¦Öú: 0 (Ó×¶ùÔ°)
- ½ð±Ò: 227.9
- Ìû×Ó: 13
- ÔÚÏß: 24.1Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 4540823
- ×¢²á: 2016-03-25
- רҵ: Íâ¹úÓïÑÔ
¡¾´ð°¸¡¿Ó¦Öú»ØÌû
¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï ¡ï
haojue1016: ½ð±Ò+15, ·ÒëEPI+1, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸, ·Ç³£¸Ðл 2016-04-26 18:48:58
haojue1016: ½ð±Ò+15, ·ÒëEPI+1, ¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï¡ï×î¼Ñ´ð°¸, ·Ç³£¸Ðл 2016-04-26 18:48:58
|
1. why should make a deoxidation from A to B? what is the advantage of A comparing with B? after A enters into the coating, it also forms B. 2. In this paper, the arrow in Fig.3 indicates the existence of A. so what is the foundation about this statement? Is it right? I am not sure the implication of the array. Furthermore, why the magnification of SEM figure has not been marked? 3. It is not clear about this section, which cannot account for any problem. So it is necessary to do it again. 4. There has a problem about abscissa in Fig.8. 5. How to figure out the average friction coefficient? Please illustrate the specific methods. 6. It lacked XRD characterizations for preparations of A and C in the paper. 7. Technological parameter should include reaction time. ½ö¹©²Î¿¼ |
2Â¥2016-04-25 17:15:40














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥