24小时热门版块排行榜

返回列表

【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题，作者xieliji1981将赠送您 5 个金币

当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

xieliji1981

新虫 (初入文坛)

应助: 0 (幼儿园)
金币: 5
帖子: 1
在线: 1.2小时
虫号: 4401614
注册: 2016-02-14
专业: 兽医传染病学

[求助] 投稿7天就收到minor revision 的邮件，文章修改后还需要review吗？已有4人参与

想请问各位大虾，看看我的文章到底外审了没有啊，我都糊涂了，才投稿7天，应该没有外审得那么快的吧，但是收到的邮件又说reviewer,让我真的很混乱。是不是我的文章还要再经历外审呢？
1. 3月21号投稿；
2. 3月26日An Editor Has Been Assigned ；
3. 3月28日收到下面的邮件，并且在投稿系统里是minor revision状态，根本没有要修改专业的内容，只是要求修改文章的格式。3月29日修改后返回是With editor状态。


邮件：
Dear Dr xie,

A Reviewer has now commented on your paper.  You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript.  If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.

For your guidance, reviewer's comments are appended below.

If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.

Your revision is due by 28 April 2016.

Please make sure to submit your editable source files (i. e. Word, TeX).

To submit a revision, go to https://arvi.edmgr.com/ and log in as an Author.  You will see a menu item call Submission Needing Revision.  You will find your submission record there.

Yours sincerely

Michael J. Studdert, PhD, DVSc
Editor
Archives of Virology

COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR:

__
There is additional documentation related to this decision letter. To access the file(s), please click the link below. You may also login to the system and click the 'View Attachments' link in the Action column.
https://arvi.edmgr.com/l.asp?i=107202&l=RO26STM5

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Badly written manuscripts are usually rejected before going out for review. Nevertheless, I would like to receive your opinion. Please shortly comment on English language of the manuscript. English language is

Reviewer #1: good

Reviewer 1:
This study was conducted to identify avian reovirus (ARV) proteins that can activate the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent Akt pathway.Based on ARV protein amino acid sequence analysis several proteins were identified as putative proteins capable of mediating PI3K/Akt pathway activation.Several recombinant plasmids were constructed and transfected into Vero cells, and the expression levels of the corresponding genes were quantified using immunofluorescence and Western blot analysis.Phosphorylated Akt (P-Akt) levels in the transfected cells were measured by flow cytometry and Western blot analysis.The results indicated that the σA and σNS proteins can activate the PI3K/Akt pathway.

This appears to bei a thorough and well done study.

Some Editorial matters for attention are identified on a Word version of the manuscript.

回复此楼

» 猜你喜欢

博士读完未来一定会好吗已经有6人回复
小论文投稿已经有3人回复
Bioresource Technology期刊，第一次返修的时候被退回好几次了已经有9人回复
心脉受损已经有3人回复
到新单位后，换了新的研究方向，没有团队，持续积累2区以上论文，能申请到面上吗已经有8人回复
申请2026年博士已经有6人回复
请问哪里可以有青B申请的本子可以借鉴一下。已经有5人回复

» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:

流水记录找博后，下一站Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UCSD 已经有11人回复
写在2011年终，2012年初已经有38人回复

1楼2016-03-30 10:27:14

已阅回复此楼关注TA 给TA发消息送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

专家经验: +14
SEPI: 1
应助: 14603 (教授)
贵宾: 11.659
金币: 345462
散金: 9262
红花: 1423
沙发: 2016
帖子: 127553
在线: 8880.4小时
虫号: 971012
注册: 2010-03-14
专业: 环境工程
管辖: 论文投稿

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与，应助指数 +1

想请问各位大虾，看看我的文章到底外审了没有啊

楼主的文章应该是送审了，只不过碰到的审稿人很给力，而且审稿意见正面。

是不是我的文章还要再经历外审呢？

这个不好说，不知道楼主投的什么期刊？有些期刊只有一个审稿人，这种情况返稿后直接接收的可能性大；有些期刊是先送审一个审稿人，如果审稿意见正面再送审一个。