24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 3030  |  回复: 7
【悬赏金币】回答本帖问题,作者xieliji1981将赠送您 5 个金币

xieliji1981

新虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 投稿7天就收到minor revision 的邮件,文章修改后还需要review吗?已有4人参与

想请问各位大虾,看看我的文章到底外审了没有啊,我都糊涂了,才投稿7天,应该没有外审得那么快的吧,但是收到的邮件又说reviewer,让我真的很混乱。是不是我的文章还要再经历外审呢?
1. 3月21号投稿;
2. 3月26日An Editor Has Been Assigned ;
3. 3月28日收到下面的邮件,并且在投稿系统里是minor revision状态,根本没有要修改专业的内容,只是要求修改文章的格式。3月29日修改后返回是With editor状态。
      
  
邮件:
Dear Dr xie,

A Reviewer has now commented on your paper.  You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript.  If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision.  

For your guidance, reviewer's comments are appended below.

If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript.

Your revision is due by 28 April 2016.

Please make sure to submit your editable source files (i. e. Word, TeX).

To submit a revision, go to https://arvi.edmgr.com/ and log in as an Author.  You will see a menu item call Submission Needing Revision.  You will find your submission record there.

Yours sincerely

Michael J. Studdert, PhD, DVSc
Editor
Archives of Virology


COMMENTS TO THE AUTHOR:


__
There is additional documentation related to this decision letter. To access the file(s), please click the link below. You may also login to the system and click the 'View Attachments' link in the Action column.
https://arvi.edmgr.com/l.asp?i=107202&l=RO26STM5

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Badly written manuscripts are usually rejected before going out for review. Nevertheless, I would like to receive your opinion. Please shortly comment on English language of the manuscript. English language is

Reviewer #1: good


Reviewer 1:
This study was conducted to identify avian reovirus (ARV) proteins that can activate the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)-dependent Akt pathway.Based on ARV protein amino acid sequence analysis several proteins were identified as putative proteins capable of mediating PI3K/Akt pathway activation.Several recombinant plasmids were constructed and transfected into Vero cells, and the expression levels of the corresponding genes were quantified using immunofluorescence and Western blot analysis.Phosphorylated Akt (P-Akt) levels in the transfected cells were measured by flow cytometry and Western blot analysis.The results indicated that the σA and σNS proteins can activate the PI3K/Akt pathway.


This appears to bei a thorough and well done study.

Some Editorial matters for attention are identified on a Word version of the manuscript.
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

那分不清

金虫 (正式写手)

这不是好消息吗?楼主应该高兴啊

发自小木虫Android客户端
等待是一种煎熬!
2楼2016-03-30 10:29:07
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ZBBcrazy

专家顾问 (知名作家)

【答案】应助回帖


感谢参与,应助指数 +1
liouzhan654: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2016-03-30 20:55:51
前面送审了,只能说审稿人这一控速步很给力,返回意见非常之快,而且给出了非常正面的结论。应该是小修后接收的,返回稿件后一般不会再送审了,编辑会直接决定accept的。祝贺楼主了!
临渊羡鱼不如退而结网!
3楼2016-03-30 10:43:23
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jiayoulongnv

新虫 (著名写手)

我想知道期刊名字,下次我也投个

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2016-03-30 10:50:28
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

paperhunter

荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)

还没想好

优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主优秀版主

【答案】应助回帖

感谢参与,应助指数 +1
想请问各位大虾,看看我的文章到底外审了没有啊

楼主的文章应该是送审了,只不过碰到的审稿人很给力,而且审稿意见正面。

是不是我的文章还要再经历外审呢?

这个不好说,不知道楼主投的什么期刊?有些期刊只有一个审稿人,这种情况返稿后直接接收的可能性大;有些期刊是先送审一个审稿人,如果审稿意见正面再送审一个。
咱也是有组织的人了...
5楼2016-03-30 11:07:25
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jiangxl

金虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

牛啊  主编直接审稿,应该是主编自己的方向吧。Archives of Virology还不错。这种情况很少见啊,呵呵
6楼2016-05-02 21:50:06
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

crazydr

新虫 (文坛精英)

神速,够快的,估计不需要外审了,即使外审也就是一两天的事啦,厉害,祝贺楼主

发自小木虫Android客户端
7楼2016-05-02 22:04:17
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

ggamis

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

【答案】应助回帖

可能是编辑自己审的。
8楼2016-05-03 10:56:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 xieliji1981 的主题更新
不应助 确定回帖应助 (注意:应助才可能被奖励,但不允许灌水,必须填写15个字符以上)
信息提示
请填处理意见