| 查看: 968 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 caolei711 的 10 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
caolei711新虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
大神们帮参考一下，这个拒稿可以重投么
|
||
|
就这么多金币了，希望大家帮忙啊。 如题，两个月前投了，技术审查很顺利，很快就送审了。 今天返回来的审稿意见，编辑给的拒稿，但是没有说可以重投。以下是拒稿信和两个审稿人意见。 Dear XXX, I have now received comments from the reviewers of your submission which are sufficiently clear, that I must reject it. For your guidance, I append the reviewers\' comments below. I hope you find these comments valuable as you develop future work. You might also like to look at the "Writing a good paper" on our Guide for Authors, for further suggestions on writing a valuable paper. Reviewer #1: This paper considers the combination of XXX and XXX. However, there are still some problems and unclear points that need to be further improved and modified, please see the attachment. Reviewer #2: XXX is an urgent problem constraining production efficiency and product quality in theXXX. Up to now, there is not enough understanding about the causes and influencing factors . Many scholars have done a lot of work, but lack of experimental verification, especially in the large-scale XXX used in production. In this study, a new model was constructed that combined XXX, XXX, and XXX. However, this paper is not experimental validated which doesn\'t fit the requirement "Simulation with no experimental verification and/or which gives no new insight into the process". 第一个审稿人给了10个有关公式中物理量描述的问题。第二个审稿人没有审稿意见，就是说没有实验验证，但是文中有简单的验证，可能不够充分。 诸位大神帮忙参谋一下，我补充足够的实验验证之后，还能重投么？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
基金开始函评了吗？
已经有16人回复
-
真的好想读博！
已经有20人回复
-
没学上
已经有12人回复
-
研二光催化6月底四篇二区什么水平
已经有15人回复
-
如何分离原料与产品
已经有12人回复
-
环肽的合成
已经有5人回复
-
学硕专硕
已经有5人回复
-
0854－0855调剂
已经有12人回复
-
with editor 两个月了，什么原因？
已经有15人回复
-
博士白读了
已经有48人回复
2楼2020-03-22 18:05:28
5
