I have now received comments from the reviewers of your submission which are sufficiently clear, that I must reject it.
For your guidance, I append the reviewers\' comments below.
I hope you find these comments valuable as you develop future work. You might also like to look at the "Writing a good paper" on our Guide for Authors, for further suggestions on writing a valuable paper.
Reviewer #1: This paper considers the combination of XXX and XXX. However, there are still some problems and unclear points that need to be further improved and modified, please see the attachment.
Reviewer #2: XXX is an urgent problem constraining production efficiency and product quality in theXXX. Up to now, there is not enough understanding about the causes and influencing factors . Many scholars have done a lot of work, but lack of experimental verification, especially in the large-scale XXX used in production.
In this study, a new model was constructed that combined XXX, XXX, and XXX. However, this paper is not experimental validated which doesn\'t fit the requirement "Simulation with no experimental verification and/or which gives no new insight into the process".