| 查看: 964 | 回复: 5 | |||
| 【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子，参与交流，就有机会分得作者 caolei711 的 10 个金币 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
caolei711新虫 (正式写手)
|
[交流]
大神们帮参考一下，这个拒稿可以重投么
|
||
|
就这么多金币了，希望大家帮忙啊。 如题，两个月前投了，技术审查很顺利，很快就送审了。 今天返回来的审稿意见，编辑给的拒稿，但是没有说可以重投。以下是拒稿信和两个审稿人意见。 Dear XXX, I have now received comments from the reviewers of your submission which are sufficiently clear, that I must reject it. For your guidance, I append the reviewers\' comments below. I hope you find these comments valuable as you develop future work. You might also like to look at the "Writing a good paper" on our Guide for Authors, for further suggestions on writing a valuable paper. Reviewer #1: This paper considers the combination of XXX and XXX. However, there are still some problems and unclear points that need to be further improved and modified, please see the attachment. Reviewer #2: XXX is an urgent problem constraining production efficiency and product quality in theXXX. Up to now, there is not enough understanding about the causes and influencing factors . Many scholars have done a lot of work, but lack of experimental verification, especially in the large-scale XXX used in production. In this study, a new model was constructed that combined XXX, XXX, and XXX. However, this paper is not experimental validated which doesn\'t fit the requirement "Simulation with no experimental verification and/or which gives no new insight into the process". 第一个审稿人给了10个有关公式中物理量描述的问题。第二个审稿人没有审稿意见，就是说没有实验验证，但是文中有简单的验证，可能不够充分。 诸位大神帮忙参谋一下，我补充足够的实验验证之后，还能重投么？ |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
博士白读了
已经有36人回复
-
刚博士毕业，入职普通一本高校
已经有17人回复
-
0854－0855调剂
已经有8人回复
-
紧急求助，有谁用过三甲基硅醇钾TMSOK吗？
已经有8人回复
-
考研，求职还是考编?
已经有18人回复
-
博士申请
已经有12人回复
-
重庆大学计算机学院2024博士招生
已经有6人回复
-
前同事拿我以前未中的国自然标书申请今年的国自然，现在基金委发来调查函
已经有44人回复
-
山东大学化学与化工学院刘磊课题组博士研究生招生启事
已经有9人回复
-
博士论文被抄袭
已经有26人回复
caolei711
新虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 1 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 1436.4
- 散金: 210
- 红花: 5
- 帖子: 991
- 在线: 26小时
- 虫号: 3370209
- 注册: 2014-08-17
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 金属材料的制备科学与跨学
送红花一朵
5楼2020-03-24 07:44:26
1000