| 查看: 2332 | 回复: 6 | |||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | |||
[求助]
Microchimica Acta审稿意见的疑惑已有1人参与
|
|||
|
一个半月前在Microchimica Acta投了篇稿件，审稿意见是“Rejection”，但又说可以“Resubmit”， 现在很犹豫，既然拒稿了，怎么又让我可以重投？ 如果重投，希望大不大，会不会是白忙乎，毕竟还要补几个实验。 请教各位达人，下一步该怎么办？是投其他杂志呢还是修改后重投？ 谢谢！ 审稿意见开头如下： Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. One reviewer has recommended rejection. We are prepared, however, to consider a revised version of the manuscript as a new submission, if you can comply in detail with the substantial scientific and formal criticism outlined below. Note that MCA has a "single-revision-only" policy. If you resubmit this article to MCA, please provide a Rebuttal Letter in Word or PDF format where you indicate how you have complied with the criticisms. In this letter, please list the comments of the reviewer one by one, then give your replies (preferably in colored text), and then list any changes that have been made in the manuscript. The rebuttal letter to me may be structured like this: |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
环肽的合成
已经有4人回复
-
基金开始函评了吗？
已经有14人回复
-
研二光催化6月底四篇二区什么水平
已经有14人回复
-
两类问题算是白选了~
已经有12人回复
-
博士白读了
已经有47人回复
-
with editor 两个月了，什么原因？
已经有14人回复
-
博士论文被抄袭
已经有42人回复
-
25年博士申请
已经有11人回复
-
学硕专硕
已经有4人回复
-
考研，求职还是考编?
已经有24人回复
6楼2018-11-19 11:56:41
2楼2018-10-11 16:58:54
paperhunter
荣誉版主 (文学泰斗)
还没想好
-
专家经验: +14 - SEPI: 1
- 应助: 14603 (教授)
- 贵宾: 11.659
- 金币: 345469
- 散金: 9262
- 红花: 1416
- 沙发: 2016
- 帖子: 127549
- 在线: 8879.2小时
- 虫号: 971012
- 注册: 2010-03-14
- 专业: 环境工程
- 管辖: 论文投稿
3楼2018-10-11 21:26:48
4楼2018-10-12 16:30:15
