24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2244  |  回复: 7

yangyan_kid

新虫 (初入文坛)

[交流] 都没送审被编辑拒了(journal of service research),从拒信里能看出点啥门道么?已有3人参与

拒信如下,感觉特别对不起教授。。。连审稿人那边都没推到,哎~越看越难受。。。
感觉好像是因为contributions不强被拒的,教授当时做实验设计的时候就提出过,但还是放手让我做了。

Dear XXX:
Thank you for submitting your manuscript, "xxxxxxxx” to the Journal of Service Research.
I have read your paper with respect to its potential suitability for JSR.
Unfortunately, after considering the manuscript, I have concluded that the paper is
not positioned well for JSR’s focus nor does it rise to JSR’s current standards for
academic contribution to service research.

The JSR is a scholarly journal that publishes the highest level of research relating
to service. To be published in JSR, a manuscript must significantly advance
theory, provide managerially-meaningful and generalizable empirical research, or
provide new models or methods that can be used to improve service.
Unfortunately, your paper does not match this profile.

The paper is very interesting, the research is well-designed, and the analyses
appear to be carefully done and sophisticated. The paper is also very well written.
While these are clear strengths of the research, the focus on XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, is not a good fit with
JSR. The paper is purely focused on e-retailing and product issues and,
unfortunately, the potential contributions to service theory and practice are not
apparent. Research published in JSR must be anchored in academic service
research and directly applicable to service theory and practice. Based on its focus
and the vast majority of the references included in the paper, it seems the paper is
a much better fit for a pure marketing, retailing or consumer behavior journal.
Thus, despite its strengths, I am sorry that I must reject your paper.

Thank you for thinking of JSR for your research and I hope you will consider the
journal again when you have research that is a bit more general and tied directly to
service.

Best wishes for success with your research program
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

qtech_he

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
都是套话,就说你的论文主题与期刊主题不符,请另投他刊。

发自小木虫IOS客户端
2楼2016-02-16 06:20:19
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yangyan_kid

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by qtech_he at 2016-02-16 06:20:19
都是套话,就说你的论文主题与期刊主题不符,请另投他刊。

第一次收到类似拒信,所以不太懂。所以没有实质上对文章的评价什么的?单单是题材问题?
3楼2016-02-16 06:25:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yangyan_kid

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by qtech_he at 2016-02-16 06:20:19
都是套话,就说你的论文主题与期刊主题不符,请另投他刊。

所以不涉及到对文章质量的评价?还是怎么的?我现在不确定文章只是题材问题还是质量问题,第一次遇到这种编辑拒的,不太清楚
4楼2016-02-16 06:26:47
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

qtech_he

金虫 (正式写手)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
跟文章质量没关系,找一个题材相像的期刊投。过了编辑就可以,进行内容评估了

发自小木虫IOS客户端
5楼2016-02-16 06:27:54
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

dorischow

新虫 (小有名气)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
因为跟JSR主题不是很符合,因此,他们并未深入你文章具体研究内容来评价。倒可以再研究下是否有主题更合适的期刊,这样reviewer也容易找到。另外,他提出你参考文献很多,保罗了很多领域,很难归为具体某个主题的期刊。这一点可能你下次再投时也要考虑一下。

发自小木虫IOS客户端
6楼2016-02-16 06:52:49
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

yangyan_kid

新虫 (初入文坛)

引用回帖:
6楼: Originally posted by dorischow at 2016-02-16 06:52:49
因为跟JSR主题不是很符合,因此,他们并未深入你文章具体研究内容来评价。倒可以再研究下是否有主题更合适的期刊,这样reviewer也容易找到。另外,他提出你参考文献很多,保罗了很多领域,很难归为具体某个主题的期 ...

嗯,有道理,我这文章确实有点难归类有点交叉型。教授回邮件说确实文章和service不太相关,被拒也正常,好在非常快,可以改投别的
7楼2016-02-16 15:19:51
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
8楼2016-02-16 16:11:31
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
相关版块跳转 我要订阅楼主 yangyan_kid 的主题更新
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见