24小时热门版块排行榜    

CyRhmU.jpeg
查看: 2616  |  回复: 7
【有奖交流】积极回复本帖子,参与交流,就有机会分得作者 zeng1987 的 37 个金币
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

zwxiaowei

木虫 (正式写手)

[交流] Microbial Biotechnology近两个月审稿意见回来,请虫友帮分析分析...

编辑回信如下:
Thank you for submitting your manuscript...... to Microbial Biotechnology.
It has now been reviewed by experts in the field who consider the topic to be interesting, but expressed substantive criticisms of a number of aspects of the article that preclude acceptance of the present version. Their comments are provided at the bottom of this letter.
I must regrettably reject your paper.
They did, however, indicate that I may wish to consider a new submission, based on the present, but substantially improved, that adequately addresses all of their criticisms and concerns. Please note that in its current state, English lenguage throughout your manuscript does not meet the journal's required standard. I recommend that you have your paper professionally edited for English language.
If you do decide to submit a new version of this manuscript to Microbial Biotechnology, you must submit it to the Editor who handled the initial version. You should also be aware that it will be reviewed by the same reviewers (unless you provide convincing reasons why this should not be the case), and that a high proportion of new versions are ultimately rejected definitively in a second round of review.
You will be unable to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of your manuscript. Instead, revise your manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer. Once you have revised your manuscript, go to https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/microbio and log in to your Author Center. Click on "Manuscripts with Decisions," and then click on "Create a Resubmission" located next to the manuscript number. Then, follow the steps for resubmitting your manuscript.
The new version must be revised in such a way that it satisfactorily addresses all issues raised by the reviewers. Any rebuttal of a criticism must be convincingly justified. In your covering letter, provide the original manuscript ID and state point-by-point how you have dealt with the comments of the reviewers. You must also provide a copy of the original manuscript on which the changes you have made are clearly shown.

Sincerely,
Dr. Auxi Prieto
Editor-in-Chief, Microbial Biotechnology
auxi@cib.csic.es

投稿系统显示 Reject and Resubmit

请各位虫友帮看看重投希望大吗?本人第一次投稿Microbial Biotechnology期刊。十分感谢。
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

WolfYang

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
zwxiaowei: 金币+10, 谢谢。 2016-02-15 10:54:08
liouzhan654: 金币+1, 应助指数+1, 鼓励应助 2016-02-15 10:56:57
相当于大修。按照审稿人的意思逐条修改,不能修改的地方详细的说明理由。然后写个response to the reviewers' conments. 要针对审稿的每个comment 认真回答,不能马虎和简单得回答。还要注意审稿人关心的问题可能分散在comments 里,你要全部找出来,然后详细回答。有时,最后你的responses 要比论文还长,我见过有50多页,结果修回稿当天就接受了。好好改,希望在80%以上。

发自小木虫Android客户端
3楼2016-02-15 10:40:36
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 8 个回答

WolfYang

至尊木虫 (职业作家)

★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
liouzhan654: 金币+1, 鼓励交流 2016-02-15 10:57:09
补充一句,编辑给了机会修改,最后却没有中,80%甚至更高都是没有充分尊重审稿人的意见,所以在回复审稿人时,一定要他感觉你很认真和努力在修改。对于所有修改的地方,在给编辑和审稿人的回复中,最好都要指出来,为他们省事,实际上就等于给自己创造机会。

发自小木虫Android客户端
4楼2016-02-15 10:48:55
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

vincent_hpax

铁杆木虫 (职业作家)

★ ★ ★ ★
小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
zwxiaowei: 金币+3, 谢谢,版面费确实挺高的。有一个审稿人给了近30条的修改意见,可以看出该杂志审稿人相当负责。 2016-02-15 13:06:40
这个杂志版面费很高的 慎重!建议可以修改后改投其他期刊
博学 慎思 明辨 笃行
6楼2016-02-15 12:58:16
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

275373414

新虫 (初入文坛)


小木虫: 金币+0.5, 给个红包,谢谢回帖
跟你投的同一个期刊,刚刚收到编辑回复 也是一样的 一起加油~!!!ps:你有没有明白这句话是什么意思?是要上传修订模式的word版本 还是上传修改稿,把修改地方标识出来?“You will be unable to make your revisions on the originally submitted version of your manuscript. Instead, revise your manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer.”
7楼2016-03-06 20:42:39
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
普通表情 高级回复(可上传附件)
信息提示
请填处理意见