| ²é¿´: 573 | »Ø¸´: 1 | ||
wjy1980Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÖøÃûдÊÖ)
|
[ÇóÖú]
´ÅÐÔÇóÖú ÒÑÓÐ1È˲ÎÓë
|
|
Éó¸åÈ˸ø³öµÄÁ½¸öÒâ¼û£¬²»Ã÷°×ÊÇʲôÒâ˼£¬Çë¸ßÊÖÖ¸µãһϣ¬Ó¦¸ÃÈçºÎ»Ø´ð»ò½øÐÐÐÞÕý 1) The shapes of both the 1/X vs. T and XT vs. T plots (as shown by the plotted data) suggest that there may be a problem with either the background correction or the correction for the diamagnetic contributions of the constituent atoms, or both. This is a much more likely cause of the slight bowing of the data observed. 2) Errors are required on your fitted magnetic parameters. I will be very surprised if the fitted value of J for compound 1 is significant with respect to the normal experimental error in such experiments. |
» ²ÂÄãϲ»¶
¹ãÖÝ´óѧ´óÍåÇø»·¾³Ñо¿Ôº»·¾³´ó·Ö×Ó²ÄÁÏÑо¿ËùÍõƽɽ½ÌÊÚÍÅ¶Ó 2026ÄêÑо¿ÉúÕÐÉú¼òÕÂ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Ìì½òÀí¹¤´óѧ
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
ÎÞ»ú»¯Ñ§ÂÛÎÄÈóÉ«/·ÒëÔõôÊÕ·Ñ?
ÒѾÓÐ142È˻ظ´
̨ÖÝѧԺÓÐÐò¶à¿×²ÄÁÏÍŶÓ×îºó³å´Ì£¬Í¬Ñ§ÃDZð´í¹ýŶ£¬ÇëËÙÁªÏµ£¡
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
½Î÷¿Æ¼¼Ê¦·¶´óѧÎïÀí»¯Ñ§¿ÎÌâ×é½ÓÊÕµ÷¼ÁÉú£¬Ãû¶î»¹ÓУ¬ËÙÀ´
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Çó̼ËáÄÆºÍ̼ËáÇâÄÆµÄ¾§°û½á¹¹Í¼»ò¾§Ìå½á¹¹Í¼
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
Çó̼ËáÄÆºÍ̼ËáÇâÄÆµÄ¾§°û½á¹¹Í¼»ò¾§Ìå½á¹¹Í¼
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
½Î÷¿Æ¼¼Ê¦·¶´óѧÎïÀí»¯Ñ§¿ÎÌâ×é½ÓÊÕµ÷¼ÁÉú£¬12µã¿ªÆô£¬ËÙÀ´
ÒѾÓÐ0È˻ظ´
wenbin2012
Ìú¸Ëľ³æ (ÕýʽдÊÖ)
- Ó¦Öú: 65 (³õÖÐÉú)
- ½ð±Ò: 16933
- É¢½ð: 10
- ºì»¨: 17
- Ìû×Ó: 490
- ÔÚÏß: 1084Сʱ
- ³æºÅ: 1479575
- ×¢²á: 2011-11-06
- רҵ: Åäλ»¯Ñ§
2Â¥2016-02-21 18:55:26














»Ø¸´´ËÂ¥