| 查看: 2191 | 回复: 10 | ||
| 当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖，点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖 | ||
xiaohuiCUMT新虫 (小有名气)
|
[求助]
各位大神，第一次投SCI，这样的回复，希望大吗？希望能给点建议！谢谢！ 已有2人参与
|
|
|
Dear Mr. Sun: Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work; however, are encouraging you to resubmit the manuscript with extensive revisions. If you choose to revise your original research, you must make all the necessary modifications before resubmitting to Environmental Earth Sciences for further evaluation. Please revise your original manuscript using a word processing program and save it on your computer. Please provide a revised manuscript with all changes clearly marked (e.g. in red, but not in tracked version) so that the reviewer can easily assess your revised work. When submitting your revised manuscript, you will be able to respond to the reviewer's comments. To expedite the review of your revised manuscript, please be specific and direct. Once the revised manuscript is prepared, you can upload it and submit it through your Author Center and please delete the old versions of your files. Please make sure to submit your editable source files (i. e. Word, TeX). To facilitate timely publication, your revised paper should be uploaded swiftly. If it is not possible for you to submit your revised manuscript in a reasonable amount of time, we may have to consider your revised version as a new submission. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your manuscript. Best regards, Gunter Doerhoefer, Dr. Editor-in-Chief Environmental Earth Sciences ------------------------------------------ COMMENTS FOR THE AUTHOR: Reviewer #1: 1. Please provide measured data (P-wave velocities before and after heating, mass before and after heating) not just change rates. 2. Please explain for how many samples you actually show data. You describe measuring 76 samples but seem to show only data for 1 sample. 3. Please include error bars and error analysis, explain variations in data between different samples 4. Please include SEM images for highest temperatures (up to 900 deg C) or explain why these were not acquired. These would be most interesting for the reader since you claim they show the most change / damage 5. Language needs a significant improvement. I suggest specific changes in the attached Word document. Consult with a native English speaker if possible. It was often not clear to me what you were trying to say (e.g. engineering rock mass, crystal water, partial mineral water, dense holes, mickle, broken liner, partial particles). 6. Please be consistent with tenses 7. Please make Figure captions more descriptive - the reader should be able to understand the figure without reading the text 8. Please indicate when speculating - you often describe processes in the sample which can not be observed in experimental data as if they were facts and not just one possible interpretation. Please explain what interpretations are based on. 9. Your conclusion section lacks a clear interpretation of your experimental results. You have have acquired an impressive amount of experimental data - make sure to draw valid conclusions. Do not just describe observations; add indications; connect with your motivation in the introduction section. 10. Please explain the indications of your research for other sandstones or other rock types. Are these expected to behave similar, .e.g damage threshold temperature, exponential increase in damage with temperature or is this behavior specific for your samples? There is additional documentation related to this decision letter. To access the file(s), please click the link below. You may also login to the system and click the 'View Attachments' link in the Action column. ******** |
回复此楼» 猜你喜欢
一志愿西安交通大学材料工程专业 282分求调剂
已经有11人回复
-
269专硕求调剂
已经有3人回复
-
资源与环境 调剂申请(333分)
已经有3人回复
-
材料求调剂
已经有5人回复
-
354求调剂
已经有9人回复
-
化学工程321分求调剂
已经有22人回复
-
考研调剂
已经有3人回复
-
326求调剂
已经有8人回复
-
333求调剂
已经有7人回复
-
一志愿东华大学控制学硕320求调剂
已经有3人回复
» 本主题相关价值贴推荐，对您同样有帮助:
- 咨询期刊回复问题
已经有3人回复
- SCI审稿意见求助
已经有16人回复
- 第一次投EST格式问题，向大神请教
已经有1人回复
- 求大神指点！关于2015PES General Meeting会议审稿
已经有8人回复
- 第一次投European Journal of Operational Research，三天后收到编辑的邮件回复
已经有9人回复
- 求助Journal of Luminescence杂志投稿及技术检查
已经有4人回复
- 第一次投稿遇到了这样的情况求各位好心人指教
已经有52人回复
- SCI文章修改，都上传什么文件？求大神们帮忙。~~~~
已经有1人回复
- 求各位大神支招啊，小弟第一次投会议
已经有11人回复
- 求助：收到论文回复，不知道主编到底什么意思
已经有13人回复
- 求助！！！ 本人小白 好多问题不明白
已经有3人回复
- 这个投稿格式怎么弄？
已经有6人回复
直心流
新虫 (小有名气)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2709.3
- 散金: 10
- 帖子: 140
- 在线: 17.6小时
- 虫号: 3627369
- 注册: 2015-01-05
- 专业: 骨、关节、软组织运动损伤
4楼2016-02-12 22:24:21
hanpeii
木虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 41 (小学生)
- 金币: 2480.1
- 红花: 10
- 帖子: 503
- 在线: 102.6小时
- 虫号: 1363801
- 注册: 2011-08-09
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 无机材料化学
2楼2016-02-12 21:49:25
zhang_wen_yi
金虫 (正式写手)
- 应助: 0 (幼儿园)
- 金币: 2048.2
- 散金: 248
- 红花: 7
- 帖子: 619
- 在线: 416.2小时
- 虫号: 3657135
- 注册: 2015-01-21
- 专业: 内流流体力学
3楼2016-02-12 21:59:20
一分六
铁杆木虫 (职业作家)
- 应助: 38 (小学生)
- 金币: 10364.4
- 散金: 2398
- 红花: 50
- 沙发: 4
- 帖子: 4628
- 在线: 1517.5小时
- 虫号: 1988790
- 注册: 2012-09-10
- 性别: GG
- 专业: 催化化学
|
审稿人没有明显拒稿的意思，按照审稿人的意见改一下还是可以重投的。从意见可以看出来审稿人很负责，也很和善，认真修改如果不换审稿人的话，个人觉得问题不大 发自小木虫Android客户端 |
5楼2016-02-12 22:27:23
