24小时热门版块排行榜    

查看: 2778  |  回复: 13
当前只显示满足指定条件的回帖,点击这里查看本话题的所有回帖

jing_123456

铜虫 (初入文坛)

[求助] 一审Major revision,请问该怎么改? 已有1人参与

本人投稿一篇SCI,今天收到一审邮件,让我大修,有两个审稿人。一个审稿人给了7条意见,

Major:
1. But in Fig.3, Fig.4 and Fig.7, the 。。。 The 。。。。are no longer under unloading conditions, so the data provided are not relevant to the topic of this paper.
2.It is subjected to the diameter of a small hole in the suction valve and other parameters such as rotation speed. But in Fig.3, Fig.4 and Fig.7, there are no any indications about the specific value of the suction pressure.
3.Almost all the conclusions of this paper can be found in a textbook. The important issues with unloading conditions are not addressed such as 。。。。。, etc.

Minor:
1.In Table 2, the clearance at the outlet end should be 0.03mm, and at the inlet end should be 0.4mm.
2.In Fig.2, the flow meter 6 between oil separator 8 and compressor 3 can measure the two phase flow of oil and air?
3.In Fig.1, the air in the separator 3 is vented to atmosphere through valve7? How about the oil in the air?
4.In Highlights, "The shaft power is more at higher rotation speed and lower discharge pressure" should be at higher discharge pressure.
另一个没有给出具体意见
The paper repeated the model what has already been published, for example in 。。。。  and other papers of the same authors. Even modelling of the ******* was presented. The paper may be published after complete rewriting in which the authors will explain what is new in their paper and add more material to justify the paper publication.
    请问我该如何回复第二位审稿人的意见,还有改完之后论文有没有可能被录,
    请各位同学提供宝贵意见,谢谢!
回复此楼
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

嗜血之翼

铜虫 (小有名气)

希望蛮大的,那个审稿人说你创新性不够但应该觉得文章写得不错,所以叫你说明创新性
Under Pressure - Queen&David Bowie
14楼2016-03-17 19:45:11
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
查看全部 14 个回答

rao0726

铁杆木虫 (著名写手)

【答案】应助回帖

★ ★ ★ ★ ★
感谢参与,应助指数 +1
jing_123456: 金币+1, ★★★很有帮助 2016-02-02 15:16:11
jing_123456: 金币+4, ★★★很有帮助 2016-02-02 19:11:54
好好修改,一条一条回答,希望很大

发自小木虫IOS客户端

» 本帖已获得的红花(最新10朵)

2楼2016-02-02 14:55:46
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
3楼2016-02-02 15:01:01
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖

jing_123456

铜虫 (初入文坛)

送红花一朵
引用回帖:
2楼: Originally posted by rao0726 at 2016-02-02 14:55:46
好好修改,一条一条回答,希望很大

谢谢,我想请问下第二个审稿人的意见该怎么回答啊?
4楼2016-02-02 15:02:52
已阅   回复此楼   关注TA 给TA发消息 送TA红花 TA的回帖
最具人气热帖推荐 [查看全部] 作者 回/看 最后发表
[基金申请] 欢迎发来filecode的Mz6后的代码验证其规律 +10 医学老男孩 2026-08-13 27/1350 2026-08-13 21:43 by chemsynth
[基金申请] 咱们一起用铁证分析2026国家社科基金中标与否 +3 启萌科技 2026-08-12 10/500 2026-08-13 20:42 by hmhminy
[文学芳草园] 阿姨 +4 汪汪锅 2026-08-09 4/200 2026-08-13 19:43 by arzu_hma
[基金申请] 静等基金结果 +8 gjjjzhong 2026-08-10 21/1050 2026-08-13 17:56 by 且听虎啸
[基金申请] filecode +14 documentary 2026-08-10 16/800 2026-08-13 16:39 by 润生71
[基金申请] 重要来源:本周末出结果 +10 瞬息宇宙 2026-08-12 10/500 2026-08-13 15:46 by likettle
[基金申请] 分享一下我之前已中青C的计划书的filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-11 5/250 2026-08-13 12:56 by cratir
[基金申请] 关于Filecode分析方法 +9 majunge000 2026-08-10 11/550 2026-08-13 10:40 by ZH远山
[基金申请] 2019年青年基金涵评意见,大家看看几个A,几个B? +11 Tide man 2026-08-11 11/550 2026-08-13 07:35 by 撸猫猫
[基金申请] 好奇怪的filecode +5 布布和一二 2026-08-08 6/300 2026-08-12 16:11 by 云上清扬
[基金申请] 奇怪,两个人的filecode固定段从头到尾一模一样 +7 布布和一二 2026-08-10 10/500 2026-08-12 09:12 by 布布和一二
[基金申请] 是这周出结果还是下周出结果? +3 yuleib84 2026-08-11 3/150 2026-08-11 21:53 by jnhyjjm
[基金申请] 关于代码变化问题,想知道的进来 +17 且听虎啸 2026-08-07 24/1200 2026-08-10 18:35 by zhangduo2008
[基金申请] 2026国自然放榜时间 +9 布布和一二 2026-08-08 9/450 2026-08-10 11:22 by xxxx2020
[基金申请] 面上项目filecode邪修 +5 西山十月 2026-08-09 7/350 2026-08-10 07:32 by 仁砚薪传
[基金申请] filecode与中标关系的预测 +5 布布和一二 2026-08-07 5/250 2026-08-09 16:15 by 袁向阳007
[基金申请] fileCode有新解读? +10 Tide man 2026-08-08 18/900 2026-08-09 12:55 by 仁砚薪传
[基金申请] 国基金的申报应该改成非等额制,评价高的钱多评价低的钱少,但是增加资助率 +7 a089 2026-08-07 7/350 2026-08-08 18:05 by gltch
[基金申请] 关于filecode +4 布布和一二 2026-08-07 7/350 2026-08-07 22:55 by zhanghaozhu
[基金申请] filecode变化情况 +6 布布和一二 2026-08-07 22/1100 2026-08-07 14:45 by 且听虎啸
信息提示
请填处理意见